Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Camilo, Claudia C.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Silveira, Celey A. E., Faeda, Rafael S. [UNESP], Almeida Rollo, Joao M. D. de, Purquerio, Benedito de Moraes, Fortulan, Carlos Alberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000347
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163089
Resumo: Background: Implants or implantable devices should integrate into the host tissue faster than fibrous capsule formation, in which the design of the interface is one of the biggest challenges. Generally, bioactive materials are not viable for load-bearing applications, so inert biomaterials are proposed. However, the surface must be modified through techniques such as coating with bioactive materials, roughness and sized pores. The aim of this research was to validate an approach for the evaluation of the tissue growth on implants of porous alumina coated with bioactive materials. Methods: Porous alumina implants were coated with 45S5 Bioglass (R) (BG) and hydroxyapatite (HA) and implanted in rat tibiae for a period of 28 days. Ex vivo resections were performed to analyze osseointegration, along with histological analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) line scanning, radiography and biomechanical testing. Results: Given that the process of implant integration needs with the bone tissue to be accelerated, it was then seen that BG acted to start the rapid integration, and HA acted to sustaining the process. Conclusions: Inert materials coated with bioglass and HA present a potential for application as bone substitutes, preferably with pores of diameters between 100 mu m and 400 mu m and, restrict for smaller than 100 mu m, because it prevents pores without organized tissue formation or vacant. Designed as functional gradient material, stand out for applications in bone tissue under load, where, being the porous surface responsible for the osseointegration and the inner material to bear and to transmit the loads.
id UNSP_58a6be439d59102a6bf6de957aee422d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/163089
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniquesBioactive glassCoated surfaceHydroxyapatiteOsseointegrationPorous alumina implantsBackground: Implants or implantable devices should integrate into the host tissue faster than fibrous capsule formation, in which the design of the interface is one of the biggest challenges. Generally, bioactive materials are not viable for load-bearing applications, so inert biomaterials are proposed. However, the surface must be modified through techniques such as coating with bioactive materials, roughness and sized pores. The aim of this research was to validate an approach for the evaluation of the tissue growth on implants of porous alumina coated with bioactive materials. Methods: Porous alumina implants were coated with 45S5 Bioglass (R) (BG) and hydroxyapatite (HA) and implanted in rat tibiae for a period of 28 days. Ex vivo resections were performed to analyze osseointegration, along with histological analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) line scanning, radiography and biomechanical testing. Results: Given that the process of implant integration needs with the bone tissue to be accelerated, it was then seen that BG acted to start the rapid integration, and HA acted to sustaining the process. Conclusions: Inert materials coated with bioglass and HA present a potential for application as bone substitutes, preferably with pores of diameters between 100 mu m and 400 mu m and, restrict for smaller than 100 mu m, because it prevents pores without organized tissue formation or vacant. Designed as functional gradient material, stand out for applications in bone tissue under load, where, being the porous surface responsible for the osseointegration and the inner material to bear and to transmit the loads.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Mech Engn, 400 Trabalhador Saocarlense, BR-13560970 Sao Carlos, SP, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, FMU, Rheumatol Div, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Dent Araraquara, Dept Diag & Surg, Araraquara, SP, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Interunits Postgrad Program Bioengn, Sao Carlos, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Dent Araraquara, Dept Diag & Surg, Araraquara, SP, BrazilCAPES: PE 0652008 481500/2007-3FAPESP: 2010/51698-0Wichtig PublishingUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Camilo, Claudia C.Silveira, Celey A. E.Faeda, Rafael S. [UNESP]Almeida Rollo, Joao M. D. dePurquerio, Benedito de MoraesFortulan, Carlos Alberto2018-11-26T17:40:02Z2018-11-26T17:40:02Z2017-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleE223-E235application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000347Journal Of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials. Milan: Wichtig Publishing, v. 15, n. 3, p. E223-E235, 2017.2280-8000http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16308910.5301/jabfm.5000347WOS:000406737800005WOS000406737800005.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials0,372info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-11T06:16:06Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/163089Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-11T06:16:06Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques
title Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques
spellingShingle Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques
Camilo, Claudia C.
Bioactive glass
Coated surface
Hydroxyapatite
Osseointegration
Porous alumina implants
title_short Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques
title_full Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques
title_fullStr Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques
title_full_unstemmed Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques
title_sort Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques
author Camilo, Claudia C.
author_facet Camilo, Claudia C.
Silveira, Celey A. E.
Faeda, Rafael S. [UNESP]
Almeida Rollo, Joao M. D. de
Purquerio, Benedito de Moraes
Fortulan, Carlos Alberto
author_role author
author2 Silveira, Celey A. E.
Faeda, Rafael S. [UNESP]
Almeida Rollo, Joao M. D. de
Purquerio, Benedito de Moraes
Fortulan, Carlos Alberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Camilo, Claudia C.
Silveira, Celey A. E.
Faeda, Rafael S. [UNESP]
Almeida Rollo, Joao M. D. de
Purquerio, Benedito de Moraes
Fortulan, Carlos Alberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bioactive glass
Coated surface
Hydroxyapatite
Osseointegration
Porous alumina implants
topic Bioactive glass
Coated surface
Hydroxyapatite
Osseointegration
Porous alumina implants
description Background: Implants or implantable devices should integrate into the host tissue faster than fibrous capsule formation, in which the design of the interface is one of the biggest challenges. Generally, bioactive materials are not viable for load-bearing applications, so inert biomaterials are proposed. However, the surface must be modified through techniques such as coating with bioactive materials, roughness and sized pores. The aim of this research was to validate an approach for the evaluation of the tissue growth on implants of porous alumina coated with bioactive materials. Methods: Porous alumina implants were coated with 45S5 Bioglass (R) (BG) and hydroxyapatite (HA) and implanted in rat tibiae for a period of 28 days. Ex vivo resections were performed to analyze osseointegration, along with histological analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) line scanning, radiography and biomechanical testing. Results: Given that the process of implant integration needs with the bone tissue to be accelerated, it was then seen that BG acted to start the rapid integration, and HA acted to sustaining the process. Conclusions: Inert materials coated with bioglass and HA present a potential for application as bone substitutes, preferably with pores of diameters between 100 mu m and 400 mu m and, restrict for smaller than 100 mu m, because it prevents pores without organized tissue formation or vacant. Designed as functional gradient material, stand out for applications in bone tissue under load, where, being the porous surface responsible for the osseointegration and the inner material to bear and to transmit the loads.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-01
2018-11-26T17:40:02Z
2018-11-26T17:40:02Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000347
Journal Of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials. Milan: Wichtig Publishing, v. 15, n. 3, p. E223-E235, 2017.
2280-8000
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163089
10.5301/jabfm.5000347
WOS:000406737800005
WOS000406737800005.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000347
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163089
identifier_str_mv Journal Of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials. Milan: Wichtig Publishing, v. 15, n. 3, p. E223-E235, 2017.
2280-8000
10.5301/jabfm.5000347
WOS:000406737800005
WOS000406737800005.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal Of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials
0,372
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv E223-E235
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wichtig Publishing
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wichtig Publishing
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965248678002688