Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000347 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163089 |
Resumo: | Background: Implants or implantable devices should integrate into the host tissue faster than fibrous capsule formation, in which the design of the interface is one of the biggest challenges. Generally, bioactive materials are not viable for load-bearing applications, so inert biomaterials are proposed. However, the surface must be modified through techniques such as coating with bioactive materials, roughness and sized pores. The aim of this research was to validate an approach for the evaluation of the tissue growth on implants of porous alumina coated with bioactive materials. Methods: Porous alumina implants were coated with 45S5 Bioglass (R) (BG) and hydroxyapatite (HA) and implanted in rat tibiae for a period of 28 days. Ex vivo resections were performed to analyze osseointegration, along with histological analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) line scanning, radiography and biomechanical testing. Results: Given that the process of implant integration needs with the bone tissue to be accelerated, it was then seen that BG acted to start the rapid integration, and HA acted to sustaining the process. Conclusions: Inert materials coated with bioglass and HA present a potential for application as bone substitutes, preferably with pores of diameters between 100 mu m and 400 mu m and, restrict for smaller than 100 mu m, because it prevents pores without organized tissue formation or vacant. Designed as functional gradient material, stand out for applications in bone tissue under load, where, being the porous surface responsible for the osseointegration and the inner material to bear and to transmit the loads. |
id |
UNSP_58a6be439d59102a6bf6de957aee422d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/163089 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniquesBioactive glassCoated surfaceHydroxyapatiteOsseointegrationPorous alumina implantsBackground: Implants or implantable devices should integrate into the host tissue faster than fibrous capsule formation, in which the design of the interface is one of the biggest challenges. Generally, bioactive materials are not viable for load-bearing applications, so inert biomaterials are proposed. However, the surface must be modified through techniques such as coating with bioactive materials, roughness and sized pores. The aim of this research was to validate an approach for the evaluation of the tissue growth on implants of porous alumina coated with bioactive materials. Methods: Porous alumina implants were coated with 45S5 Bioglass (R) (BG) and hydroxyapatite (HA) and implanted in rat tibiae for a period of 28 days. Ex vivo resections were performed to analyze osseointegration, along with histological analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) line scanning, radiography and biomechanical testing. Results: Given that the process of implant integration needs with the bone tissue to be accelerated, it was then seen that BG acted to start the rapid integration, and HA acted to sustaining the process. Conclusions: Inert materials coated with bioglass and HA present a potential for application as bone substitutes, preferably with pores of diameters between 100 mu m and 400 mu m and, restrict for smaller than 100 mu m, because it prevents pores without organized tissue formation or vacant. Designed as functional gradient material, stand out for applications in bone tissue under load, where, being the porous surface responsible for the osseointegration and the inner material to bear and to transmit the loads.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Mech Engn, 400 Trabalhador Saocarlense, BR-13560970 Sao Carlos, SP, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, FMU, Rheumatol Div, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Dent Araraquara, Dept Diag & Surg, Araraquara, SP, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Interunits Postgrad Program Bioengn, Sao Carlos, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Dent Araraquara, Dept Diag & Surg, Araraquara, SP, BrazilCAPES: PE 0652008 481500/2007-3FAPESP: 2010/51698-0Wichtig PublishingUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Camilo, Claudia C.Silveira, Celey A. E.Faeda, Rafael S. [UNESP]Almeida Rollo, Joao M. D. dePurquerio, Benedito de MoraesFortulan, Carlos Alberto2018-11-26T17:40:02Z2018-11-26T17:40:02Z2017-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleE223-E235application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000347Journal Of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials. Milan: Wichtig Publishing, v. 15, n. 3, p. E223-E235, 2017.2280-8000http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16308910.5301/jabfm.5000347WOS:000406737800005WOS000406737800005.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials0,372info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-26T15:21:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/163089Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-26T15:21:55Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques |
title |
Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques |
spellingShingle |
Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques Camilo, Claudia C. Bioactive glass Coated surface Hydroxyapatite Osseointegration Porous alumina implants |
title_short |
Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques |
title_full |
Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques |
title_fullStr |
Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques |
title_sort |
Bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques |
author |
Camilo, Claudia C. |
author_facet |
Camilo, Claudia C. Silveira, Celey A. E. Faeda, Rafael S. [UNESP] Almeida Rollo, Joao M. D. de Purquerio, Benedito de Moraes Fortulan, Carlos Alberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silveira, Celey A. E. Faeda, Rafael S. [UNESP] Almeida Rollo, Joao M. D. de Purquerio, Benedito de Moraes Fortulan, Carlos Alberto |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Camilo, Claudia C. Silveira, Celey A. E. Faeda, Rafael S. [UNESP] Almeida Rollo, Joao M. D. de Purquerio, Benedito de Moraes Fortulan, Carlos Alberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bioactive glass Coated surface Hydroxyapatite Osseointegration Porous alumina implants |
topic |
Bioactive glass Coated surface Hydroxyapatite Osseointegration Porous alumina implants |
description |
Background: Implants or implantable devices should integrate into the host tissue faster than fibrous capsule formation, in which the design of the interface is one of the biggest challenges. Generally, bioactive materials are not viable for load-bearing applications, so inert biomaterials are proposed. However, the surface must be modified through techniques such as coating with bioactive materials, roughness and sized pores. The aim of this research was to validate an approach for the evaluation of the tissue growth on implants of porous alumina coated with bioactive materials. Methods: Porous alumina implants were coated with 45S5 Bioglass (R) (BG) and hydroxyapatite (HA) and implanted in rat tibiae for a period of 28 days. Ex vivo resections were performed to analyze osseointegration, along with histological analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) line scanning, radiography and biomechanical testing. Results: Given that the process of implant integration needs with the bone tissue to be accelerated, it was then seen that BG acted to start the rapid integration, and HA acted to sustaining the process. Conclusions: Inert materials coated with bioglass and HA present a potential for application as bone substitutes, preferably with pores of diameters between 100 mu m and 400 mu m and, restrict for smaller than 100 mu m, because it prevents pores without organized tissue formation or vacant. Designed as functional gradient material, stand out for applications in bone tissue under load, where, being the porous surface responsible for the osseointegration and the inner material to bear and to transmit the loads. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-01 2018-11-26T17:40:02Z 2018-11-26T17:40:02Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000347 Journal Of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials. Milan: Wichtig Publishing, v. 15, n. 3, p. E223-E235, 2017. 2280-8000 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163089 10.5301/jabfm.5000347 WOS:000406737800005 WOS000406737800005.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000347 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163089 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal Of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials. Milan: Wichtig Publishing, v. 15, n. 3, p. E223-E235, 2017. 2280-8000 10.5301/jabfm.5000347 WOS:000406737800005 WOS000406737800005.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal Of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials 0,372 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
E223-E235 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wichtig Publishing |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wichtig Publishing |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546470506233856 |