Color stability of conventional and bulk fill composite resins
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
DOI: | 10.1590/1981-863720180001000023125 |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-863720180001000023125 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157961 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACTObjective: This study compared the color stability of different dental composite resins after prolonged exposure to a coffee solution.Methods: Sixty-four cylindrical discs (10 mm diameter x 2 mm thickness) were prepared using 8 different dental composite resins (n=8, per group). The specimens were first immersed in artificial saliva for 24 h followed by immersion in a coffee solution for 14 days. The assessment of chromatic variation (ΔE) was performed with the aid of a Vita Easyshade Advanced spectrophotometer (VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Sackingen, Germany). The color of each specimen was calculated based on the L*, a* and b* coordinates of the CIELab system.Results: Grandio SO had the lowest average chromatic variation (ΔE=7.77) after immersion in coffee solution. Durafill VS, Grandio and Z350 XT (ΔE=8.58; ΔE=9.52; ΔE=10.39, respectively) showed similar chromatic variation, with no statistical difference in relation to Grandio SO. However, the other dental composite resins evaluated showed statistically higher values of ΔE compared to Grandio SO, and Enamel HRi (ΔE=20.56) demonstrated the highest chromatic variation.Conclusion: The Bulk Fill and hybrid composite resins from the same manufacturer (Micerium, Avegno, Italy) showed greater chromatic variation than the other composite resins tested. Grandio SO (Voco, Cuxaven, Germany) had the lowest ΔE variation. |
id |
UNSP_5a841c09e5043da81ce272b58696fd9d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/157961 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Color stability of conventional and bulk fill composite resinsEstabilidade cromática de resinas convencionais e resinas bulk fillBiomimeticColorComposite resins.BiomiméticaCorResinas compostas.ABSTRACTObjective: This study compared the color stability of different dental composite resins after prolonged exposure to a coffee solution.Methods: Sixty-four cylindrical discs (10 mm diameter x 2 mm thickness) were prepared using 8 different dental composite resins (n=8, per group). The specimens were first immersed in artificial saliva for 24 h followed by immersion in a coffee solution for 14 days. The assessment of chromatic variation (ΔE) was performed with the aid of a Vita Easyshade Advanced spectrophotometer (VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Sackingen, Germany). The color of each specimen was calculated based on the L*, a* and b* coordinates of the CIELab system.Results: Grandio SO had the lowest average chromatic variation (ΔE=7.77) after immersion in coffee solution. Durafill VS, Grandio and Z350 XT (ΔE=8.58; ΔE=9.52; ΔE=10.39, respectively) showed similar chromatic variation, with no statistical difference in relation to Grandio SO. However, the other dental composite resins evaluated showed statistically higher values of ΔE compared to Grandio SO, and Enamel HRi (ΔE=20.56) demonstrated the highest chromatic variation.Conclusion: The Bulk Fill and hybrid composite resins from the same manufacturer (Micerium, Avegno, Italy) showed greater chromatic variation than the other composite resins tested. Grandio SO (Voco, Cuxaven, Germany) had the lowest ΔE variation.RESUMOObjetivo: Comparar diferentes resinas compostas em relação á estabilidade de cor após exposição prolongada em solução de café.Métodos: Sessenta e quatro discos cilíndricos (10mm x 2mm) foram confeccionados a partir de 8 diferentes marcas comerciais de compósitos (n= 8 por grupo); os espécimes foram imersos em saliva artificial, e posteriormente em café, sendo por conseguinte feita a avaliação da variação cromática (ΔE), utilizando espectrofotômetro Vita Easyshade Advanced (VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Sackingen, Germany). O padrão de cada espécime foi medido examinando as coordenadas L*, a* e b* do sistema CIELab.Resultados: A resina composta Grandio SO apresentou a menor média de variação cromática (ΔE= 7,77) após a imersão em solução de café. Semelhantemente, a variação cromática das resinas compostas Durafill VS, Grandio e Z350 XT (ΔE=8,58; ΔE=9,52; ΔE=10.39) que não apresentaram diferença estatística. Todavia, as demais resinas compostas avaliadas apresentaram valores estatisticamente maiores de ΔE em relação a resina Grandio SO, sendo que a resina Enamel HRi (ΔE= 20,56) apresentou a maior variação cromática registrada.Conclusão: As resinas da categoria bulk fill e as resinas híbridas produzidas pelo mesmo fabricante (Micerium, Avegno, Itália) tiveram alterações cromáticas superiores às demais resinas testadas sendo que a resina GrandioSO (Voco, Cuxaven, Alemanha) foi a que apresentou menor alteração de ∆E.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências OdontológicasUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho Faculdade de OdontologiaUniversidade Federal de Alfenas Faculdade de OdontologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências OdontológicasUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho Faculdade de OdontologiaFaculdade São Leopoldo MandicUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de Alfenas Faculdade de OdontologiaTrevisan, Tamara CarolinaGusson JÚnior, MarceloBortolatto, Janaína FreitasPigossi, SuzaneOliveira JÚnior, Osmir Batista DeRicci, Weber Adad2018-11-12T17:27:44Z2018-11-12T17:27:44Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article15-20application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-863720180001000023125RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia. Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, v. 66, n. 1, p. 15-20, 2018.1981-8637http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15796110.1590/1981-863720180001000023125S1981-86372018000100015S1981-86372018000100015.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-21T06:23:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/157961Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:35:28.153528Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Color stability of conventional and bulk fill composite resins Estabilidade cromática de resinas convencionais e resinas bulk fill |
title |
Color stability of conventional and bulk fill composite resins |
spellingShingle |
Color stability of conventional and bulk fill composite resins Color stability of conventional and bulk fill composite resins Trevisan, Tamara Carolina Biomimetic Color Composite resins. Biomimética Cor Resinas compostas. Trevisan, Tamara Carolina Biomimetic Color Composite resins. Biomimética Cor Resinas compostas. |
title_short |
Color stability of conventional and bulk fill composite resins |
title_full |
Color stability of conventional and bulk fill composite resins |
title_fullStr |
Color stability of conventional and bulk fill composite resins Color stability of conventional and bulk fill composite resins |
title_full_unstemmed |
Color stability of conventional and bulk fill composite resins Color stability of conventional and bulk fill composite resins |
title_sort |
Color stability of conventional and bulk fill composite resins |
author |
Trevisan, Tamara Carolina |
author_facet |
Trevisan, Tamara Carolina Trevisan, Tamara Carolina Gusson JÚnior, Marcelo Bortolatto, Janaína Freitas Pigossi, Suzane Oliveira JÚnior, Osmir Batista De Ricci, Weber Adad Gusson JÚnior, Marcelo Bortolatto, Janaína Freitas Pigossi, Suzane Oliveira JÚnior, Osmir Batista De Ricci, Weber Adad |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gusson JÚnior, Marcelo Bortolatto, Janaína Freitas Pigossi, Suzane Oliveira JÚnior, Osmir Batista De Ricci, Weber Adad |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade Federal de Alfenas Faculdade de Odontologia |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Trevisan, Tamara Carolina Gusson JÚnior, Marcelo Bortolatto, Janaína Freitas Pigossi, Suzane Oliveira JÚnior, Osmir Batista De Ricci, Weber Adad |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biomimetic Color Composite resins. Biomimética Cor Resinas compostas. |
topic |
Biomimetic Color Composite resins. Biomimética Cor Resinas compostas. |
description |
ABSTRACTObjective: This study compared the color stability of different dental composite resins after prolonged exposure to a coffee solution.Methods: Sixty-four cylindrical discs (10 mm diameter x 2 mm thickness) were prepared using 8 different dental composite resins (n=8, per group). The specimens were first immersed in artificial saliva for 24 h followed by immersion in a coffee solution for 14 days. The assessment of chromatic variation (ΔE) was performed with the aid of a Vita Easyshade Advanced spectrophotometer (VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Sackingen, Germany). The color of each specimen was calculated based on the L*, a* and b* coordinates of the CIELab system.Results: Grandio SO had the lowest average chromatic variation (ΔE=7.77) after immersion in coffee solution. Durafill VS, Grandio and Z350 XT (ΔE=8.58; ΔE=9.52; ΔE=10.39, respectively) showed similar chromatic variation, with no statistical difference in relation to Grandio SO. However, the other dental composite resins evaluated showed statistically higher values of ΔE compared to Grandio SO, and Enamel HRi (ΔE=20.56) demonstrated the highest chromatic variation.Conclusion: The Bulk Fill and hybrid composite resins from the same manufacturer (Micerium, Avegno, Italy) showed greater chromatic variation than the other composite resins tested. Grandio SO (Voco, Cuxaven, Germany) had the lowest ΔE variation. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-12T17:27:44Z 2018-11-12T17:27:44Z 2018-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-863720180001000023125 RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia. Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, v. 66, n. 1, p. 15-20, 2018. 1981-8637 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157961 10.1590/1981-863720180001000023125 S1981-86372018000100015 S1981-86372018000100015.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-863720180001000023125 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157961 |
identifier_str_mv |
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia. Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, v. 66, n. 1, p. 15-20, 2018. 1981-8637 10.1590/1981-863720180001000023125 S1981-86372018000100015 S1981-86372018000100015.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
15-20 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822182537431089152 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1981-863720180001000023125 |