Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162013000200004 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/5987 |
Resumo: | Gibberellin inhibitor growth regulators are used for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) canopy manipulation to avoid excess growth and yield losses. However, under temperatures below or over the optimum for cotton production the effect of mepiquat chloride (MC) has not always been significant. In this experiment, cotton plants were grown in growth chambers to study the response to MC as affected by temperature and to determine if an increase in dose could overcome the temperature effects. Mepiquat chloride was applied at rates of 0, 15 and 30 g ai ha-1 at the pinhead square stage. Plants were then grown under three temperature regimes: 25/15 °C, 32/22 °C, and 39/29 °C (day/night temperatures) for 51 days. Higher temperatures increased plant height, reproductive branches, fruit number, fruit abscission, and photosynthesis per unit area, but decreased leaf area and chlorophyll. The largest effect of MC on plant height was observed when the daily temperature was 32 °C, with nights of 22 °C, which was also best for plant growth. High temperatures not only decreased the effectiveness of MC on plant height control, but also caused lower dry matter and fruit number per plant. Low temperatures (25/15 ºC) decreased cotton growth and fruit retention, but a higher concentration of MC was required per unit of growth reduction as compared with 32/22 ºC. At high temperatures, the rate of MC to be applied must be disproportionately increased, because either plant growth is impaired by high temperature lessening the effect of MC, or degradation of MC within the plant is too rapid. |
id |
UNSP_5d38d72428c71786110bbeb28de03298 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/5987 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperatureplant growth regulatorcotton growthphotosynthesisGibberellin inhibitor growth regulators are used for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) canopy manipulation to avoid excess growth and yield losses. However, under temperatures below or over the optimum for cotton production the effect of mepiquat chloride (MC) has not always been significant. In this experiment, cotton plants were grown in growth chambers to study the response to MC as affected by temperature and to determine if an increase in dose could overcome the temperature effects. Mepiquat chloride was applied at rates of 0, 15 and 30 g ai ha-1 at the pinhead square stage. Plants were then grown under three temperature regimes: 25/15 °C, 32/22 °C, and 39/29 °C (day/night temperatures) for 51 days. Higher temperatures increased plant height, reproductive branches, fruit number, fruit abscission, and photosynthesis per unit area, but decreased leaf area and chlorophyll. The largest effect of MC on plant height was observed when the daily temperature was 32 °C, with nights of 22 °C, which was also best for plant growth. High temperatures not only decreased the effectiveness of MC on plant height control, but also caused lower dry matter and fruit number per plant. Low temperatures (25/15 ºC) decreased cotton growth and fruit retention, but a higher concentration of MC was required per unit of growth reduction as compared with 32/22 ºC. At high temperatures, the rate of MC to be applied must be disproportionately increased, because either plant growth is impaired by high temperature lessening the effect of MC, or degradation of MC within the plant is too rapid.UNESP FCA Depto. de Produção VegetalUniversity of Arkansas Crop, Soil, and Environmental SciencesIAPARUNESP FCA Depto. de Produção VegetalUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALQ)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)University of Arkansas Crop, Soil, and Environmental SciencesIAPARRosolem, Ciro Antonio [UNESP]Oosterhuis, Derrick M.Souza, Fabio S. de2014-05-20T13:21:02Z2014-05-20T13:21:02Z2013-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article82-87application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162013000200004Scientia Agricola. São Paulo - Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, v. 70, n. 2, p. 82-87, 2013.0103-9016http://hdl.handle.net/11449/598710.1590/S0103-90162013000200004S0103-90162013000200004WOS:000316764500004S0103-90162013000200004.pdf57207758732595280000-0003-2001-0874SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengScientia Agricola0,578info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T15:56:16Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/5987Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:03:48.703904Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature |
title |
Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature |
spellingShingle |
Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature Rosolem, Ciro Antonio [UNESP] plant growth regulator cotton growth photosynthesis |
title_short |
Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature |
title_full |
Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature |
title_fullStr |
Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature |
title_sort |
Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature |
author |
Rosolem, Ciro Antonio [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Rosolem, Ciro Antonio [UNESP] Oosterhuis, Derrick M. Souza, Fabio S. de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oosterhuis, Derrick M. Souza, Fabio S. de |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) University of Arkansas Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences IAPAR |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rosolem, Ciro Antonio [UNESP] Oosterhuis, Derrick M. Souza, Fabio S. de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
plant growth regulator cotton growth photosynthesis |
topic |
plant growth regulator cotton growth photosynthesis |
description |
Gibberellin inhibitor growth regulators are used for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) canopy manipulation to avoid excess growth and yield losses. However, under temperatures below or over the optimum for cotton production the effect of mepiquat chloride (MC) has not always been significant. In this experiment, cotton plants were grown in growth chambers to study the response to MC as affected by temperature and to determine if an increase in dose could overcome the temperature effects. Mepiquat chloride was applied at rates of 0, 15 and 30 g ai ha-1 at the pinhead square stage. Plants were then grown under three temperature regimes: 25/15 °C, 32/22 °C, and 39/29 °C (day/night temperatures) for 51 days. Higher temperatures increased plant height, reproductive branches, fruit number, fruit abscission, and photosynthesis per unit area, but decreased leaf area and chlorophyll. The largest effect of MC on plant height was observed when the daily temperature was 32 °C, with nights of 22 °C, which was also best for plant growth. High temperatures not only decreased the effectiveness of MC on plant height control, but also caused lower dry matter and fruit number per plant. Low temperatures (25/15 ºC) decreased cotton growth and fruit retention, but a higher concentration of MC was required per unit of growth reduction as compared with 32/22 ºC. At high temperatures, the rate of MC to be applied must be disproportionately increased, because either plant growth is impaired by high temperature lessening the effect of MC, or degradation of MC within the plant is too rapid. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-04-01 2014-05-20T13:21:02Z 2014-05-20T13:21:02Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162013000200004 Scientia Agricola. São Paulo - Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, v. 70, n. 2, p. 82-87, 2013. 0103-9016 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/5987 10.1590/S0103-90162013000200004 S0103-90162013000200004 WOS:000316764500004 S0103-90162013000200004.pdf 5720775873259528 0000-0003-2001-0874 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162013000200004 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/5987 |
identifier_str_mv |
Scientia Agricola. São Paulo - Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, v. 70, n. 2, p. 82-87, 2013. 0103-9016 10.1590/S0103-90162013000200004 S0103-90162013000200004 WOS:000316764500004 S0103-90162013000200004.pdf 5720775873259528 0000-0003-2001-0874 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agricola 0,578 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
82-87 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALQ) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALQ) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128748809093120 |