Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosolem, Ciro A.
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Oosterhuis, Derrick M., Souza, Fabio S. de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/52987
Resumo: Gibberellin inhibitor growth regulators are used for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) canopy manipulation to avoid excess growth and yield losses. However, under temperatures below or over the optimum for cotton production the effect of mepiquat chloride (MC) has not always been significant. In this experiment, cotton plants were grown in growth chambers to study the response to MC as affected by temperature and to determine if an increase in dose could overcome the temperature effects. Mepiquat chloride was applied at rates of 0, 15 and 30 g ai ha-1 at the pinhead square stage. Plants were then grown under three temperature regimes: 25/15 °C, 32/22 °C, and 39/29 °C (day/night temperatures) for 51 days. Higher temperatures increased plant height, reproductive branches, fruit number, fruit abscission, and photosynthesis per unit area, but decreased leaf area and chlorophyll. The largest effect of MC on plant height was observed when the daily temperature was 32 °C, with nights of 22 °C, which was also best for plant growth. High temperatures not only decreased the effectiveness of MC on plant height control, but also caused lower dry matter and fruit number per plant. Low temperatures (25/15 ºC) decreased cotton growth and fruit retention, but a higher concentration of MC was required per unit of growth reduction as compared with 32/22 ºC. At high temperatures, the rate of MC to be applied must be disproportionately increased, because either plant growth is impaired by high temperature lessening the effect of MC, or degradation of MC within the plant is too rapid.
id USP-18_062df259ade257f5c248bf6532434931
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/52987
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature plant growth regulatorcotton growthphotosynthesis Gibberellin inhibitor growth regulators are used for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) canopy manipulation to avoid excess growth and yield losses. However, under temperatures below or over the optimum for cotton production the effect of mepiquat chloride (MC) has not always been significant. In this experiment, cotton plants were grown in growth chambers to study the response to MC as affected by temperature and to determine if an increase in dose could overcome the temperature effects. Mepiquat chloride was applied at rates of 0, 15 and 30 g ai ha-1 at the pinhead square stage. Plants were then grown under three temperature regimes: 25/15 °C, 32/22 °C, and 39/29 °C (day/night temperatures) for 51 days. Higher temperatures increased plant height, reproductive branches, fruit number, fruit abscission, and photosynthesis per unit area, but decreased leaf area and chlorophyll. The largest effect of MC on plant height was observed when the daily temperature was 32 °C, with nights of 22 °C, which was also best for plant growth. High temperatures not only decreased the effectiveness of MC on plant height control, but also caused lower dry matter and fruit number per plant. Low temperatures (25/15 ºC) decreased cotton growth and fruit retention, but a higher concentration of MC was required per unit of growth reduction as compared with 32/22 ºC. At high temperatures, the rate of MC to be applied must be disproportionately increased, because either plant growth is impaired by high temperature lessening the effect of MC, or degradation of MC within the plant is too rapid. Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2013-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/5298710.1590/S0103-90162013000200004Scientia Agricola; v. 70 n. 2 (2013); 82-87Scientia Agricola; Vol. 70 Núm. 2 (2013); 82-87Scientia Agricola; Vol. 70 No. 2 (2013); 82-871678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/52987/57043Copyright (c) 2015 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRosolem, Ciro A.Oosterhuis, Derrick M.Souza, Fabio S. de2015-07-07T19:19:11Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/52987Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2015-07-07T19:19:11Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature
title Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature
spellingShingle Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature
Rosolem, Ciro A.
plant growth regulator
cotton growth
photosynthesis
title_short Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature
title_full Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature
title_fullStr Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature
title_full_unstemmed Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature
title_sort Cotton response to mepiquat chloride and temperature
author Rosolem, Ciro A.
author_facet Rosolem, Ciro A.
Oosterhuis, Derrick M.
Souza, Fabio S. de
author_role author
author2 Oosterhuis, Derrick M.
Souza, Fabio S. de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosolem, Ciro A.
Oosterhuis, Derrick M.
Souza, Fabio S. de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv plant growth regulator
cotton growth
photosynthesis
topic plant growth regulator
cotton growth
photosynthesis
description Gibberellin inhibitor growth regulators are used for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) canopy manipulation to avoid excess growth and yield losses. However, under temperatures below or over the optimum for cotton production the effect of mepiquat chloride (MC) has not always been significant. In this experiment, cotton plants were grown in growth chambers to study the response to MC as affected by temperature and to determine if an increase in dose could overcome the temperature effects. Mepiquat chloride was applied at rates of 0, 15 and 30 g ai ha-1 at the pinhead square stage. Plants were then grown under three temperature regimes: 25/15 °C, 32/22 °C, and 39/29 °C (day/night temperatures) for 51 days. Higher temperatures increased plant height, reproductive branches, fruit number, fruit abscission, and photosynthesis per unit area, but decreased leaf area and chlorophyll. The largest effect of MC on plant height was observed when the daily temperature was 32 °C, with nights of 22 °C, which was also best for plant growth. High temperatures not only decreased the effectiveness of MC on plant height control, but also caused lower dry matter and fruit number per plant. Low temperatures (25/15 ºC) decreased cotton growth and fruit retention, but a higher concentration of MC was required per unit of growth reduction as compared with 32/22 ºC. At high temperatures, the rate of MC to be applied must be disproportionately increased, because either plant growth is impaired by high temperature lessening the effect of MC, or degradation of MC within the plant is too rapid.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/52987
10.1590/S0103-90162013000200004
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/52987
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-90162013000200004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/52987/57043
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Scientia Agricola
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Scientia Agricola
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 70 n. 2 (2013); 82-87
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 70 Núm. 2 (2013); 82-87
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 70 No. 2 (2013); 82-87
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1800222791934410752