Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114293 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201193 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to investigate the replacement of a true protein source (soybean meal, SBM) with non-protein nitrogen (NPN) sources (urea, U; or encapsulated nitrate (NO3 −), EN) and corn with or without the addition of elemental sulfur (S0) to the NPN diets on digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, microbial protein synthesis (MPS) efficiency, and methane (CH4) emissions in growing beef cattle. Ten ruminally-cannulated steers were used in a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design (five pure-bred Nellore and five cross-bred Angus × Nellore) with 5 periods of 21 d each (14 d for diet adaptation and 7 d for sample collection). The total mixed ration contained chopped Tifton 85 hay as a forage source in a 50:50 (wt/wt) concentrate to forage ratio (DM basis). The treatments were: SBM as control; U; U plus S0 (US); EN; and EN plus S0 (ENS). Inclusion level of EN was 20 g/kg DM (equivalent to 14.3 g NO3 −/kg DM). Urea inclusion (8 g/kg DM) was calculated to supply the same amount of NPN as the EN diets. Elemental sulfur was included at 2.4 g/kg DM. Animals fed NPN diets (U or EN) had lower (P ≤ 0.01) DMI, OMI, and aNDFI compared to animals fed SBM. Animals fed EN consumed less (P = 0.006) N than animals fed U-containing diets. Nitrogen excreted in feces and urine was lower (P ≤ 0.05) for animals fed NPN diets compared to SBM, but N digestibility did not differ (P = 0.30) between diets. Rumen pH was greater (P < 0.001) for EN compared to U diets. Animals fed NPN diets had lower (P = 0.03) daily CH4 emissions compared to SBM (76.5 vs. 95 g CH4/d, respectively). Addition of S0 to NPN-containing diets did not alter (P ≥ 0.06) any parameter evaluated. Encapsulated nitrate and corn with or without the addition of elemental sulfur partially replacing SBM or as an alternative source of NPN to urea in beef cattle diets did not decrease CH4 emissions or adversely affect microbial protein synthesis. |
id |
UNSP_5da1615674fc8c5f66af5af2419484fa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201193 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattleBeef cattleEncapsulated nitrateMethaneMicrobial protein synthesisNon-protein nitrogenThe objective of this study was to investigate the replacement of a true protein source (soybean meal, SBM) with non-protein nitrogen (NPN) sources (urea, U; or encapsulated nitrate (NO3 −), EN) and corn with or without the addition of elemental sulfur (S0) to the NPN diets on digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, microbial protein synthesis (MPS) efficiency, and methane (CH4) emissions in growing beef cattle. Ten ruminally-cannulated steers were used in a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design (five pure-bred Nellore and five cross-bred Angus × Nellore) with 5 periods of 21 d each (14 d for diet adaptation and 7 d for sample collection). The total mixed ration contained chopped Tifton 85 hay as a forage source in a 50:50 (wt/wt) concentrate to forage ratio (DM basis). The treatments were: SBM as control; U; U plus S0 (US); EN; and EN plus S0 (ENS). Inclusion level of EN was 20 g/kg DM (equivalent to 14.3 g NO3 −/kg DM). Urea inclusion (8 g/kg DM) was calculated to supply the same amount of NPN as the EN diets. Elemental sulfur was included at 2.4 g/kg DM. Animals fed NPN diets (U or EN) had lower (P ≤ 0.01) DMI, OMI, and aNDFI compared to animals fed SBM. Animals fed EN consumed less (P = 0.006) N than animals fed U-containing diets. Nitrogen excreted in feces and urine was lower (P ≤ 0.05) for animals fed NPN diets compared to SBM, but N digestibility did not differ (P = 0.30) between diets. Rumen pH was greater (P < 0.001) for EN compared to U diets. Animals fed NPN diets had lower (P = 0.03) daily CH4 emissions compared to SBM (76.5 vs. 95 g CH4/d, respectively). Addition of S0 to NPN-containing diets did not alter (P ≥ 0.06) any parameter evaluated. Encapsulated nitrate and corn with or without the addition of elemental sulfur partially replacing SBM or as an alternative source of NPN to urea in beef cattle diets did not decrease CH4 emissions or adversely affect microbial protein synthesis.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Department of Animal Sciences School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), West Mains RoadGRASP Ind. & Com. LTDADepartment of Animal Sciences Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center The Ohio State University (OSU)Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia/Ciência AnimalConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoDepartment of Animal Sciences School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)FAPESP: 01562-0/2016Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Scotland's Rural College (SRUC)GRASP Ind. & Com. LTDAThe Ohio State University (OSU)Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia/Ciência AnimalConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoRebelo, Lucas R. [UNESP]Luna, Irene C.Messana, Juliana D. [UNESP]Araujo, Rafael C.Simioni, Tiago A. [UNESP]Granja-Salcedo, Yury T. [UNESP]Vito, Elias S. [UNESP]Lee, ChanheeTeixeira, Izabelle A.M.A. [UNESP]Rooke, John A.Berchielli, Telma T. [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:26:24Z2020-12-12T02:26:24Z2019-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114293Animal Feed Science and Technology, v. 257.0377-8401http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20119310.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.1142932-s2.0-85072595374Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAnimal Feed Science and Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T18:43:47Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201193Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:01:00.164811Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle |
title |
Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle |
spellingShingle |
Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle Rebelo, Lucas R. [UNESP] Beef cattle Encapsulated nitrate Methane Microbial protein synthesis Non-protein nitrogen |
title_short |
Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle |
title_full |
Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle |
title_fullStr |
Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle |
title_sort |
Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle |
author |
Rebelo, Lucas R. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Rebelo, Lucas R. [UNESP] Luna, Irene C. Messana, Juliana D. [UNESP] Araujo, Rafael C. Simioni, Tiago A. [UNESP] Granja-Salcedo, Yury T. [UNESP] Vito, Elias S. [UNESP] Lee, Chanhee Teixeira, Izabelle A.M.A. [UNESP] Rooke, John A. Berchielli, Telma T. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Luna, Irene C. Messana, Juliana D. [UNESP] Araujo, Rafael C. Simioni, Tiago A. [UNESP] Granja-Salcedo, Yury T. [UNESP] Vito, Elias S. [UNESP] Lee, Chanhee Teixeira, Izabelle A.M.A. [UNESP] Rooke, John A. Berchielli, Telma T. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Scotland's Rural College (SRUC) GRASP Ind. & Com. LTDA The Ohio State University (OSU) Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia/Ciência Animal Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rebelo, Lucas R. [UNESP] Luna, Irene C. Messana, Juliana D. [UNESP] Araujo, Rafael C. Simioni, Tiago A. [UNESP] Granja-Salcedo, Yury T. [UNESP] Vito, Elias S. [UNESP] Lee, Chanhee Teixeira, Izabelle A.M.A. [UNESP] Rooke, John A. Berchielli, Telma T. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Beef cattle Encapsulated nitrate Methane Microbial protein synthesis Non-protein nitrogen |
topic |
Beef cattle Encapsulated nitrate Methane Microbial protein synthesis Non-protein nitrogen |
description |
The objective of this study was to investigate the replacement of a true protein source (soybean meal, SBM) with non-protein nitrogen (NPN) sources (urea, U; or encapsulated nitrate (NO3 −), EN) and corn with or without the addition of elemental sulfur (S0) to the NPN diets on digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, microbial protein synthesis (MPS) efficiency, and methane (CH4) emissions in growing beef cattle. Ten ruminally-cannulated steers were used in a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design (five pure-bred Nellore and five cross-bred Angus × Nellore) with 5 periods of 21 d each (14 d for diet adaptation and 7 d for sample collection). The total mixed ration contained chopped Tifton 85 hay as a forage source in a 50:50 (wt/wt) concentrate to forage ratio (DM basis). The treatments were: SBM as control; U; U plus S0 (US); EN; and EN plus S0 (ENS). Inclusion level of EN was 20 g/kg DM (equivalent to 14.3 g NO3 −/kg DM). Urea inclusion (8 g/kg DM) was calculated to supply the same amount of NPN as the EN diets. Elemental sulfur was included at 2.4 g/kg DM. Animals fed NPN diets (U or EN) had lower (P ≤ 0.01) DMI, OMI, and aNDFI compared to animals fed SBM. Animals fed EN consumed less (P = 0.006) N than animals fed U-containing diets. Nitrogen excreted in feces and urine was lower (P ≤ 0.05) for animals fed NPN diets compared to SBM, but N digestibility did not differ (P = 0.30) between diets. Rumen pH was greater (P < 0.001) for EN compared to U diets. Animals fed NPN diets had lower (P = 0.03) daily CH4 emissions compared to SBM (76.5 vs. 95 g CH4/d, respectively). Addition of S0 to NPN-containing diets did not alter (P ≥ 0.06) any parameter evaluated. Encapsulated nitrate and corn with or without the addition of elemental sulfur partially replacing SBM or as an alternative source of NPN to urea in beef cattle diets did not decrease CH4 emissions or adversely affect microbial protein synthesis. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-01 2020-12-12T02:26:24Z 2020-12-12T02:26:24Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114293 Animal Feed Science and Technology, v. 257. 0377-8401 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201193 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114293 2-s2.0-85072595374 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114293 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201193 |
identifier_str_mv |
Animal Feed Science and Technology, v. 257. 0377-8401 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114293 2-s2.0-85072595374 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Animal Feed Science and Technology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129274355384320 |