Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rebelo, Lucas R. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Luna, Irene C., Messana, Juliana D. [UNESP], Araujo, Rafael C., Simioni, Tiago A. [UNESP], Granja-Salcedo, Yury T. [UNESP], Vito, Elias S. [UNESP], Lee, Chanhee, Teixeira, Izabelle A.M.A. [UNESP], Rooke, John A., Berchielli, Telma T. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114293
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201193
Resumo: The objective of this study was to investigate the replacement of a true protein source (soybean meal, SBM) with non-protein nitrogen (NPN) sources (urea, U; or encapsulated nitrate (NO3 −), EN) and corn with or without the addition of elemental sulfur (S0) to the NPN diets on digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, microbial protein synthesis (MPS) efficiency, and methane (CH4) emissions in growing beef cattle. Ten ruminally-cannulated steers were used in a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design (five pure-bred Nellore and five cross-bred Angus × Nellore) with 5 periods of 21 d each (14 d for diet adaptation and 7 d for sample collection). The total mixed ration contained chopped Tifton 85 hay as a forage source in a 50:50 (wt/wt) concentrate to forage ratio (DM basis). The treatments were: SBM as control; U; U plus S0 (US); EN; and EN plus S0 (ENS). Inclusion level of EN was 20 g/kg DM (equivalent to 14.3 g NO3 −/kg DM). Urea inclusion (8 g/kg DM) was calculated to supply the same amount of NPN as the EN diets. Elemental sulfur was included at 2.4 g/kg DM. Animals fed NPN diets (U or EN) had lower (P ≤ 0.01) DMI, OMI, and aNDFI compared to animals fed SBM. Animals fed EN consumed less (P = 0.006) N than animals fed U-containing diets. Nitrogen excreted in feces and urine was lower (P ≤ 0.05) for animals fed NPN diets compared to SBM, but N digestibility did not differ (P = 0.30) between diets. Rumen pH was greater (P < 0.001) for EN compared to U diets. Animals fed NPN diets had lower (P = 0.03) daily CH4 emissions compared to SBM (76.5 vs. 95 g CH4/d, respectively). Addition of S0 to NPN-containing diets did not alter (P ≥ 0.06) any parameter evaluated. Encapsulated nitrate and corn with or without the addition of elemental sulfur partially replacing SBM or as an alternative source of NPN to urea in beef cattle diets did not decrease CH4 emissions or adversely affect microbial protein synthesis.
id UNSP_5da1615674fc8c5f66af5af2419484fa
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201193
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattleBeef cattleEncapsulated nitrateMethaneMicrobial protein synthesisNon-protein nitrogenThe objective of this study was to investigate the replacement of a true protein source (soybean meal, SBM) with non-protein nitrogen (NPN) sources (urea, U; or encapsulated nitrate (NO3 −), EN) and corn with or without the addition of elemental sulfur (S0) to the NPN diets on digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, microbial protein synthesis (MPS) efficiency, and methane (CH4) emissions in growing beef cattle. Ten ruminally-cannulated steers were used in a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design (five pure-bred Nellore and five cross-bred Angus × Nellore) with 5 periods of 21 d each (14 d for diet adaptation and 7 d for sample collection). The total mixed ration contained chopped Tifton 85 hay as a forage source in a 50:50 (wt/wt) concentrate to forage ratio (DM basis). The treatments were: SBM as control; U; U plus S0 (US); EN; and EN plus S0 (ENS). Inclusion level of EN was 20 g/kg DM (equivalent to 14.3 g NO3 −/kg DM). Urea inclusion (8 g/kg DM) was calculated to supply the same amount of NPN as the EN diets. Elemental sulfur was included at 2.4 g/kg DM. Animals fed NPN diets (U or EN) had lower (P ≤ 0.01) DMI, OMI, and aNDFI compared to animals fed SBM. Animals fed EN consumed less (P = 0.006) N than animals fed U-containing diets. Nitrogen excreted in feces and urine was lower (P ≤ 0.05) for animals fed NPN diets compared to SBM, but N digestibility did not differ (P = 0.30) between diets. Rumen pH was greater (P < 0.001) for EN compared to U diets. Animals fed NPN diets had lower (P = 0.03) daily CH4 emissions compared to SBM (76.5 vs. 95 g CH4/d, respectively). Addition of S0 to NPN-containing diets did not alter (P ≥ 0.06) any parameter evaluated. Encapsulated nitrate and corn with or without the addition of elemental sulfur partially replacing SBM or as an alternative source of NPN to urea in beef cattle diets did not decrease CH4 emissions or adversely affect microbial protein synthesis.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Department of Animal Sciences School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), West Mains RoadGRASP Ind. & Com. LTDADepartment of Animal Sciences Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center The Ohio State University (OSU)Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia/Ciência AnimalConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoDepartment of Animal Sciences School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)FAPESP: 01562-0/2016Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Scotland's Rural College (SRUC)GRASP Ind. & Com. LTDAThe Ohio State University (OSU)Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia/Ciência AnimalConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoRebelo, Lucas R. [UNESP]Luna, Irene C.Messana, Juliana D. [UNESP]Araujo, Rafael C.Simioni, Tiago A. [UNESP]Granja-Salcedo, Yury T. [UNESP]Vito, Elias S. [UNESP]Lee, ChanheeTeixeira, Izabelle A.M.A. [UNESP]Rooke, John A.Berchielli, Telma T. [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:26:24Z2020-12-12T02:26:24Z2019-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114293Animal Feed Science and Technology, v. 257.0377-8401http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20119310.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.1142932-s2.0-85072595374Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAnimal Feed Science and Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T18:43:47Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201193Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:01:00.164811Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle
title Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle
spellingShingle Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle
Rebelo, Lucas R. [UNESP]
Beef cattle
Encapsulated nitrate
Methane
Microbial protein synthesis
Non-protein nitrogen
title_short Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle
title_full Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle
title_fullStr Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle
title_full_unstemmed Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle
title_sort Effect of replacing soybean meal with urea or encapsulated nitrate with or without elemental sulfur on nitrogen digestion and methane emissions in feedlot cattle
author Rebelo, Lucas R. [UNESP]
author_facet Rebelo, Lucas R. [UNESP]
Luna, Irene C.
Messana, Juliana D. [UNESP]
Araujo, Rafael C.
Simioni, Tiago A. [UNESP]
Granja-Salcedo, Yury T. [UNESP]
Vito, Elias S. [UNESP]
Lee, Chanhee
Teixeira, Izabelle A.M.A. [UNESP]
Rooke, John A.
Berchielli, Telma T. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Luna, Irene C.
Messana, Juliana D. [UNESP]
Araujo, Rafael C.
Simioni, Tiago A. [UNESP]
Granja-Salcedo, Yury T. [UNESP]
Vito, Elias S. [UNESP]
Lee, Chanhee
Teixeira, Izabelle A.M.A. [UNESP]
Rooke, John A.
Berchielli, Telma T. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Scotland's Rural College (SRUC)
GRASP Ind. & Com. LTDA
The Ohio State University (OSU)
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia/Ciência Animal
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rebelo, Lucas R. [UNESP]
Luna, Irene C.
Messana, Juliana D. [UNESP]
Araujo, Rafael C.
Simioni, Tiago A. [UNESP]
Granja-Salcedo, Yury T. [UNESP]
Vito, Elias S. [UNESP]
Lee, Chanhee
Teixeira, Izabelle A.M.A. [UNESP]
Rooke, John A.
Berchielli, Telma T. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Beef cattle
Encapsulated nitrate
Methane
Microbial protein synthesis
Non-protein nitrogen
topic Beef cattle
Encapsulated nitrate
Methane
Microbial protein synthesis
Non-protein nitrogen
description The objective of this study was to investigate the replacement of a true protein source (soybean meal, SBM) with non-protein nitrogen (NPN) sources (urea, U; or encapsulated nitrate (NO3 −), EN) and corn with or without the addition of elemental sulfur (S0) to the NPN diets on digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, microbial protein synthesis (MPS) efficiency, and methane (CH4) emissions in growing beef cattle. Ten ruminally-cannulated steers were used in a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design (five pure-bred Nellore and five cross-bred Angus × Nellore) with 5 periods of 21 d each (14 d for diet adaptation and 7 d for sample collection). The total mixed ration contained chopped Tifton 85 hay as a forage source in a 50:50 (wt/wt) concentrate to forage ratio (DM basis). The treatments were: SBM as control; U; U plus S0 (US); EN; and EN plus S0 (ENS). Inclusion level of EN was 20 g/kg DM (equivalent to 14.3 g NO3 −/kg DM). Urea inclusion (8 g/kg DM) was calculated to supply the same amount of NPN as the EN diets. Elemental sulfur was included at 2.4 g/kg DM. Animals fed NPN diets (U or EN) had lower (P ≤ 0.01) DMI, OMI, and aNDFI compared to animals fed SBM. Animals fed EN consumed less (P = 0.006) N than animals fed U-containing diets. Nitrogen excreted in feces and urine was lower (P ≤ 0.05) for animals fed NPN diets compared to SBM, but N digestibility did not differ (P = 0.30) between diets. Rumen pH was greater (P < 0.001) for EN compared to U diets. Animals fed NPN diets had lower (P = 0.03) daily CH4 emissions compared to SBM (76.5 vs. 95 g CH4/d, respectively). Addition of S0 to NPN-containing diets did not alter (P ≥ 0.06) any parameter evaluated. Encapsulated nitrate and corn with or without the addition of elemental sulfur partially replacing SBM or as an alternative source of NPN to urea in beef cattle diets did not decrease CH4 emissions or adversely affect microbial protein synthesis.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-01
2020-12-12T02:26:24Z
2020-12-12T02:26:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114293
Animal Feed Science and Technology, v. 257.
0377-8401
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201193
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114293
2-s2.0-85072595374
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114293
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201193
identifier_str_mv Animal Feed Science and Technology, v. 257.
0377-8401
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114293
2-s2.0-85072595374
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Animal Feed Science and Technology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129274355384320