Chitosan combined with technical cashew nut shell liquid improves in vitro ruminal parameters and gas production kinetics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Queiroz Vieira, Elis Regina
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: e Buschinelli, Rafael Henrique de Tonissi, Diaz, Tatiana Garcia, Osmari, Milene Puntel, de Oliveira Seno, Leonardo, Ítavo, Luís Carlos Vinhas, Gandra, Jefferson Rodrigues, Anschau, Douglas Gabriel, de Oliveira, Raquel Tenório, da Silva, Nayara Gonçalves, Jacaúna, Amanna Gonzaga [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.37496/RBZ5120200186
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246339
Resumo: The objective was to evaluate the inclusion of chitosan (CHI) and technical cashew nut shell liquid (CNSLt) as natural feed additives in cattle diets on nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and in vitro gas production kinetics. We conducted a completely randomized design with 5×4 factorial arrangement, with 20, 35, 50, 65, and 100% Tifton 85 hay and four additives, monensin (200 mg/kg DM), CNSLt (500 mg/kg DM), CHI (500 mg/kg DM), and CNSLt+CHI (500 mg/kg DM/each). Dry matter (DM) and organic matter (OM) digestibility showed a linear reduction according to forage levels. The highest DM digestibility was observed with CHI on cattle diets. Inclusion of CHI increased DM digestibility. The highest in vitro organic matter and crude protein (CP) digestibilities were observed for CNSLt+CHI. The in vitro dry matter digestibility increased linearly with concentrate in the diet. There was interaction of forage:concentrate ratio and the additives for neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber and hemicellulose digestibility. Chitosan, CNSLt, and CNSLt+CHI promoted the lowest acetate:propionate ratio compared with monensin. Total gas production showed interaction of the forage:concentrate ratio and additives. Lag time was lowest with CNSLt+CHI. Chitosan and CNSLt can be considered alternative fermentation modulators to ionophores by improving nutrient digestibility and increasing ruminal propionate concentrations.
id UNSP_5db289571d6d1f375a31c7b59bc26c11
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/246339
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Chitosan combined with technical cashew nut shell liquid improves in vitro ruminal parameters and gas production kineticsGas productionNatural feed additivesRumen fermentationShort-chain fatty acidsThe objective was to evaluate the inclusion of chitosan (CHI) and technical cashew nut shell liquid (CNSLt) as natural feed additives in cattle diets on nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and in vitro gas production kinetics. We conducted a completely randomized design with 5×4 factorial arrangement, with 20, 35, 50, 65, and 100% Tifton 85 hay and four additives, monensin (200 mg/kg DM), CNSLt (500 mg/kg DM), CHI (500 mg/kg DM), and CNSLt+CHI (500 mg/kg DM/each). Dry matter (DM) and organic matter (OM) digestibility showed a linear reduction according to forage levels. The highest DM digestibility was observed with CHI on cattle diets. Inclusion of CHI increased DM digestibility. The highest in vitro organic matter and crude protein (CP) digestibilities were observed for CNSLt+CHI. The in vitro dry matter digestibility increased linearly with concentrate in the diet. There was interaction of forage:concentrate ratio and the additives for neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber and hemicellulose digestibility. Chitosan, CNSLt, and CNSLt+CHI promoted the lowest acetate:propionate ratio compared with monensin. Total gas production showed interaction of the forage:concentrate ratio and additives. Lag time was lowest with CNSLt+CHI. Chitosan and CNSLt can be considered alternative fermentation modulators to ionophores by improving nutrient digestibility and increasing ruminal propionate concentrations.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Universidade Federal do Tocantins Escola de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, TOUniversidade Federal da Grande Dourados Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias, MSUniversidade Estadual de Maringá Departamento de Zootecnia, PRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina Departamento de Zootecnia e Desenvolvimento Rural, SCUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, MSUniversidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará Instituto de Estudos em Desenvolvimento Agrário e Regional, PAUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, SPEscola de Medicina Veterinária e ZootecniaFaculdade de Ciências AgráriasUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)Instituto de Estudos em Desenvolvimento Agrário e RegionalUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)de Queiroz Vieira, Elis Reginae Buschinelli, Rafael Henrique de TonissiDiaz, Tatiana GarciaOsmari, Milene Puntelde Oliveira Seno, LeonardoÍtavo, Luís Carlos VinhasGandra, Jefferson RodriguesAnschau, Douglas Gabrielde Oliveira, Raquel Tenórioda Silva, Nayara GonçalvesJacaúna, Amanna Gonzaga [UNESP]2023-07-29T12:38:19Z2023-07-29T12:38:19Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.37496/RBZ5120200186Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 51.1806-92901516-3598http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24633910.37496/RBZ51202001862-s2.0-85142224189Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira de Zootecniainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-29T12:38:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/246339Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-07-29T12:38:19Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Chitosan combined with technical cashew nut shell liquid improves in vitro ruminal parameters and gas production kinetics
title Chitosan combined with technical cashew nut shell liquid improves in vitro ruminal parameters and gas production kinetics
spellingShingle Chitosan combined with technical cashew nut shell liquid improves in vitro ruminal parameters and gas production kinetics
de Queiroz Vieira, Elis Regina
Gas production
Natural feed additives
Rumen fermentation
Short-chain fatty acids
title_short Chitosan combined with technical cashew nut shell liquid improves in vitro ruminal parameters and gas production kinetics
title_full Chitosan combined with technical cashew nut shell liquid improves in vitro ruminal parameters and gas production kinetics
title_fullStr Chitosan combined with technical cashew nut shell liquid improves in vitro ruminal parameters and gas production kinetics
title_full_unstemmed Chitosan combined with technical cashew nut shell liquid improves in vitro ruminal parameters and gas production kinetics
title_sort Chitosan combined with technical cashew nut shell liquid improves in vitro ruminal parameters and gas production kinetics
author de Queiroz Vieira, Elis Regina
author_facet de Queiroz Vieira, Elis Regina
e Buschinelli, Rafael Henrique de Tonissi
Diaz, Tatiana Garcia
Osmari, Milene Puntel
de Oliveira Seno, Leonardo
Ítavo, Luís Carlos Vinhas
Gandra, Jefferson Rodrigues
Anschau, Douglas Gabriel
de Oliveira, Raquel Tenório
da Silva, Nayara Gonçalves
Jacaúna, Amanna Gonzaga [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 e Buschinelli, Rafael Henrique de Tonissi
Diaz, Tatiana Garcia
Osmari, Milene Puntel
de Oliveira Seno, Leonardo
Ítavo, Luís Carlos Vinhas
Gandra, Jefferson Rodrigues
Anschau, Douglas Gabriel
de Oliveira, Raquel Tenório
da Silva, Nayara Gonçalves
Jacaúna, Amanna Gonzaga [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
Instituto de Estudos em Desenvolvimento Agrário e Regional
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Queiroz Vieira, Elis Regina
e Buschinelli, Rafael Henrique de Tonissi
Diaz, Tatiana Garcia
Osmari, Milene Puntel
de Oliveira Seno, Leonardo
Ítavo, Luís Carlos Vinhas
Gandra, Jefferson Rodrigues
Anschau, Douglas Gabriel
de Oliveira, Raquel Tenório
da Silva, Nayara Gonçalves
Jacaúna, Amanna Gonzaga [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gas production
Natural feed additives
Rumen fermentation
Short-chain fatty acids
topic Gas production
Natural feed additives
Rumen fermentation
Short-chain fatty acids
description The objective was to evaluate the inclusion of chitosan (CHI) and technical cashew nut shell liquid (CNSLt) as natural feed additives in cattle diets on nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and in vitro gas production kinetics. We conducted a completely randomized design with 5×4 factorial arrangement, with 20, 35, 50, 65, and 100% Tifton 85 hay and four additives, monensin (200 mg/kg DM), CNSLt (500 mg/kg DM), CHI (500 mg/kg DM), and CNSLt+CHI (500 mg/kg DM/each). Dry matter (DM) and organic matter (OM) digestibility showed a linear reduction according to forage levels. The highest DM digestibility was observed with CHI on cattle diets. Inclusion of CHI increased DM digestibility. The highest in vitro organic matter and crude protein (CP) digestibilities were observed for CNSLt+CHI. The in vitro dry matter digestibility increased linearly with concentrate in the diet. There was interaction of forage:concentrate ratio and the additives for neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber and hemicellulose digestibility. Chitosan, CNSLt, and CNSLt+CHI promoted the lowest acetate:propionate ratio compared with monensin. Total gas production showed interaction of the forage:concentrate ratio and additives. Lag time was lowest with CNSLt+CHI. Chitosan and CNSLt can be considered alternative fermentation modulators to ionophores by improving nutrient digestibility and increasing ruminal propionate concentrations.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
2023-07-29T12:38:19Z
2023-07-29T12:38:19Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.37496/RBZ5120200186
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 51.
1806-9290
1516-3598
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246339
10.37496/RBZ5120200186
2-s2.0-85142224189
url http://dx.doi.org/10.37496/RBZ5120200186
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246339
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 51.
1806-9290
1516-3598
10.37496/RBZ5120200186
2-s2.0-85142224189
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803047090787450880