Performance of three transducer mounting methods in impedance-based structural health monitoring applications

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Silveira, Ricardo Zanni Mendes [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Campeiro, Leandro Melo [UNESP], Baptista, Fabricio Guimarães [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1045389X17689942
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170145
Resumo: Piezoelectric transducers are widely used in many nondestructive methods for damage detection in structural health monitoring applications. Among the various methods for detecting damage, the electromechanical impedance technique is known for using thin and small piezoelectric ceramics operating simultaneously as actuators and sensors. The basic method of installing these piezoelectric ceramics in the host structure is using a high-stiffness adhesive such as epoxy or cyanoacrylate glue. However, some studies have proposed alternative methods of transducer mounting, therein aiming to reuse the transducer or allowing for the monitoring of structures under adverse conditions under which the direct installation of the sensor would not be possible. Thus, the objective of this study is to analyze and compare the performance of three main mounting methods for metal structures for applications based on the electromechanical impedance technique: magnetic mounting, metal-wire-based mounting, and conventional mounting using adhesives. Tests were conducted on aluminum beams, and the performances of the three transducer mounting methods were compared using basic damage indices and the pencil-lead-break test. The experimental results indicate that the mounting method has a significant effect on the frequency response and sensitivity for damage detection.
id UNSP_61260eca01a141c15152f5d87e73b1ad
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170145
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Performance of three transducer mounting methods in impedance-based structural health monitoring applicationsdamageelectromechanical impedancemountingpiezoelectric transducerstructural health monitoringPiezoelectric transducers are widely used in many nondestructive methods for damage detection in structural health monitoring applications. Among the various methods for detecting damage, the electromechanical impedance technique is known for using thin and small piezoelectric ceramics operating simultaneously as actuators and sensors. The basic method of installing these piezoelectric ceramics in the host structure is using a high-stiffness adhesive such as epoxy or cyanoacrylate glue. However, some studies have proposed alternative methods of transducer mounting, therein aiming to reuse the transducer or allowing for the monitoring of structures under adverse conditions under which the direct installation of the sensor would not be possible. Thus, the objective of this study is to analyze and compare the performance of three main mounting methods for metal structures for applications based on the electromechanical impedance technique: magnetic mounting, metal-wire-based mounting, and conventional mounting using adhesives. Tests were conducted on aluminum beams, and the performances of the three transducer mounting methods were compared using basic damage indices and the pencil-lead-break test. The experimental results indicate that the mounting method has a significant effect on the frequency response and sensitivity for damage detection.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de EngenhariaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de EngenhariaFAPESP: 2015/02500-6Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)da Silveira, Ricardo Zanni Mendes [UNESP]Campeiro, Leandro Melo [UNESP]Baptista, Fabricio Guimarães [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:49:28Z2018-12-11T16:49:28Z2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2349-2362application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1045389X17689942Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, v. 28, n. 17, p. 2349-2362, 2017.1530-81381045-389Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/17014510.1177/1045389X176899422-s2.0-850296322662-s2.0-85029632266.pdf24263302049198140000-0002-1200-4354Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structuresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-03T06:12:52Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170145Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-03T06:12:52Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Performance of three transducer mounting methods in impedance-based structural health monitoring applications
title Performance of three transducer mounting methods in impedance-based structural health monitoring applications
spellingShingle Performance of three transducer mounting methods in impedance-based structural health monitoring applications
da Silveira, Ricardo Zanni Mendes [UNESP]
damage
electromechanical impedance
mounting
piezoelectric transducer
structural health monitoring
title_short Performance of three transducer mounting methods in impedance-based structural health monitoring applications
title_full Performance of three transducer mounting methods in impedance-based structural health monitoring applications
title_fullStr Performance of three transducer mounting methods in impedance-based structural health monitoring applications
title_full_unstemmed Performance of three transducer mounting methods in impedance-based structural health monitoring applications
title_sort Performance of three transducer mounting methods in impedance-based structural health monitoring applications
author da Silveira, Ricardo Zanni Mendes [UNESP]
author_facet da Silveira, Ricardo Zanni Mendes [UNESP]
Campeiro, Leandro Melo [UNESP]
Baptista, Fabricio Guimarães [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Campeiro, Leandro Melo [UNESP]
Baptista, Fabricio Guimarães [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Silveira, Ricardo Zanni Mendes [UNESP]
Campeiro, Leandro Melo [UNESP]
Baptista, Fabricio Guimarães [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv damage
electromechanical impedance
mounting
piezoelectric transducer
structural health monitoring
topic damage
electromechanical impedance
mounting
piezoelectric transducer
structural health monitoring
description Piezoelectric transducers are widely used in many nondestructive methods for damage detection in structural health monitoring applications. Among the various methods for detecting damage, the electromechanical impedance technique is known for using thin and small piezoelectric ceramics operating simultaneously as actuators and sensors. The basic method of installing these piezoelectric ceramics in the host structure is using a high-stiffness adhesive such as epoxy or cyanoacrylate glue. However, some studies have proposed alternative methods of transducer mounting, therein aiming to reuse the transducer or allowing for the monitoring of structures under adverse conditions under which the direct installation of the sensor would not be possible. Thus, the objective of this study is to analyze and compare the performance of three main mounting methods for metal structures for applications based on the electromechanical impedance technique: magnetic mounting, metal-wire-based mounting, and conventional mounting using adhesives. Tests were conducted on aluminum beams, and the performances of the three transducer mounting methods were compared using basic damage indices and the pencil-lead-break test. The experimental results indicate that the mounting method has a significant effect on the frequency response and sensitivity for damage detection.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-01
2018-12-11T16:49:28Z
2018-12-11T16:49:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1045389X17689942
Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, v. 28, n. 17, p. 2349-2362, 2017.
1530-8138
1045-389X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170145
10.1177/1045389X17689942
2-s2.0-85029632266
2-s2.0-85029632266.pdf
2426330204919814
0000-0002-1200-4354
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1045389X17689942
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170145
identifier_str_mv Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, v. 28, n. 17, p. 2349-2362, 2017.
1530-8138
1045-389X
10.1177/1045389X17689942
2-s2.0-85029632266
2-s2.0-85029632266.pdf
2426330204919814
0000-0002-1200-4354
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 2349-2362
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965154372222976