A Comparative Study of Impedance Measurement Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring Applications
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2018.2792854 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175850 |
Resumo: | Structural health monitoring (SHM) systems are scientifically and economically relevant as methods of detecting structural damage to various types of structures, thus increasing safety and reducing maintenance costs. Among the various principles of damage detection, the electromechanical impedance (EMI) method is based on the electrical impedance measurement of piezoelectric transducers attached to the monitored structure. Here, the accuracy and precision of the measurement system are fundamental for the correct diagnosis of the structure. Therefore, this paper performs a comparative analysis of two impedance measurement techniques for damage detection that are typically used in commercial impedance analyzers and other alternative measurement systems: 1) transient-state measurements using a sweep excitation signal and 2) steady-state measurements using a pure sinusoidal signal for each excitation frequency. Tests were performed with resistive and capacitive loads with known values and a piezoelectric transducer fixed to an aluminum bar representing a monitored structure. The two techniques were compared based on the accuracy, precision, and time required for the measurements. The results highlight the important features of each technique that should be considered for the development of impedance-based SHM systems and the correct diagnosis of monitored structures. |
id |
UNSP_76b622d961aad10fa9a99b2e05d67955 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/175850 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
A Comparative Study of Impedance Measurement Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring ApplicationsElectromechanicalimpedancemeasurementpiezoelectric transducersstructural health monitoring (SHM)Structural health monitoring (SHM) systems are scientifically and economically relevant as methods of detecting structural damage to various types of structures, thus increasing safety and reducing maintenance costs. Among the various principles of damage detection, the electromechanical impedance (EMI) method is based on the electrical impedance measurement of piezoelectric transducers attached to the monitored structure. Here, the accuracy and precision of the measurement system are fundamental for the correct diagnosis of the structure. Therefore, this paper performs a comparative analysis of two impedance measurement techniques for damage detection that are typically used in commercial impedance analyzers and other alternative measurement systems: 1) transient-state measurements using a sweep excitation signal and 2) steady-state measurements using a pure sinusoidal signal for each excitation frequency. Tests were performed with resistive and capacitive loads with known values and a piezoelectric transducer fixed to an aluminum bar representing a monitored structure. The two techniques were compared based on the accuracy, precision, and time required for the measurements. The results highlight the important features of each technique that should be considered for the development of impedance-based SHM systems and the correct diagnosis of monitored structures.São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Engineering Bauru Department of Electrical Engineering Laboratory of Transducers and Data AcquisitionSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Engineering Bauru Department of Electrical Engineering Laboratory of Transducers and Data AcquisitionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Budoya, Danilo Ecidir [UNESP]Baptista, Fabricio Guimarães [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:17:51Z2018-12-11T17:17:51Z2018-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article912-924application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2018.2792854IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, v. 67, n. 4, p. 912-924, 2018.0018-9456http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17585010.1109/TIM.2018.27928542-s2.0-850416631632-s2.0-85041663163.pdf24263302049198140000-0002-1200-4354Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement0,938info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-28T13:34:09Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/175850Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:01:39.310694Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A Comparative Study of Impedance Measurement Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring Applications |
title |
A Comparative Study of Impedance Measurement Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring Applications |
spellingShingle |
A Comparative Study of Impedance Measurement Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring Applications Budoya, Danilo Ecidir [UNESP] Electromechanical impedance measurement piezoelectric transducers structural health monitoring (SHM) |
title_short |
A Comparative Study of Impedance Measurement Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring Applications |
title_full |
A Comparative Study of Impedance Measurement Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring Applications |
title_fullStr |
A Comparative Study of Impedance Measurement Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring Applications |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparative Study of Impedance Measurement Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring Applications |
title_sort |
A Comparative Study of Impedance Measurement Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring Applications |
author |
Budoya, Danilo Ecidir [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Budoya, Danilo Ecidir [UNESP] Baptista, Fabricio Guimarães [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Baptista, Fabricio Guimarães [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Budoya, Danilo Ecidir [UNESP] Baptista, Fabricio Guimarães [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Electromechanical impedance measurement piezoelectric transducers structural health monitoring (SHM) |
topic |
Electromechanical impedance measurement piezoelectric transducers structural health monitoring (SHM) |
description |
Structural health monitoring (SHM) systems are scientifically and economically relevant as methods of detecting structural damage to various types of structures, thus increasing safety and reducing maintenance costs. Among the various principles of damage detection, the electromechanical impedance (EMI) method is based on the electrical impedance measurement of piezoelectric transducers attached to the monitored structure. Here, the accuracy and precision of the measurement system are fundamental for the correct diagnosis of the structure. Therefore, this paper performs a comparative analysis of two impedance measurement techniques for damage detection that are typically used in commercial impedance analyzers and other alternative measurement systems: 1) transient-state measurements using a sweep excitation signal and 2) steady-state measurements using a pure sinusoidal signal for each excitation frequency. Tests were performed with resistive and capacitive loads with known values and a piezoelectric transducer fixed to an aluminum bar representing a monitored structure. The two techniques were compared based on the accuracy, precision, and time required for the measurements. The results highlight the important features of each technique that should be considered for the development of impedance-based SHM systems and the correct diagnosis of monitored structures. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-11T17:17:51Z 2018-12-11T17:17:51Z 2018-04-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2018.2792854 IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, v. 67, n. 4, p. 912-924, 2018. 0018-9456 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175850 10.1109/TIM.2018.2792854 2-s2.0-85041663163 2-s2.0-85041663163.pdf 2426330204919814 0000-0002-1200-4354 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2018.2792854 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175850 |
identifier_str_mv |
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, v. 67, n. 4, p. 912-924, 2018. 0018-9456 10.1109/TIM.2018.2792854 2-s2.0-85041663163 2-s2.0-85041663163.pdf 2426330204919814 0000-0002-1200-4354 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 0,938 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
912-924 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128307023052800 |