Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: De Ol Carapeba, Gabriel
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Nicácio, Isabela P. G. A., Stelle, Ana Beatriz F., Bruno, Tatiane S., Nicácio, Gabriel M., Costa Júnior, José S., Giuffrida, Rogerio, Teixeira Neto, Francisco J. [UNESP], Cassu, Renata N.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02303-9
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200192
Resumo: Background: Infiltration of the surgical site with local anesthetics combined with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may play an important role in improving perioperative pain control. This prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate intraoperative isoflurane requirements, postoperative analgesia, and adverse events of infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and combined with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Forty-five cats premedicated with acepromazine/meperidine and anesthetized with propofol/isoflurane were randomly distributed into three treatments (n = 15 per group): Physiological saline (group S), ropivacaine alone (1 mg/kg, group R) or combined with meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg, group RM) infiltrated at the surgical site (incision line, ovarian pedicles and uterus). End-tidal isoflurane concentration (FE'ISO), recorded at specific time points during surgery, was adjusted to inhibit autonomic responses to surgical stimulation. Pain was assessed using an Interactive Visual Analog Scale (IVAS), UNESP-Botucatu Multidimensional Composite Pain Scale (MCPS), and mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNT) up to 24 h post-extubation. Rescue analgesia was provided with intramuscular morphine (0.1 mg/kg) when MCPS was ≥6. Results: Area under the curve (AUC) of FE'ISO was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in the RM (17.8 ± 3.1) compared to S (23.1 ± 2.2) and R groups (22.8 ± 1.1). Hypertension (systolic arterial pressure > 160 mmHg) coinciding with surgical manipulation was observed only in cats treated with S and R (4/15 cats, P = 0.08). The number of cats receiving rescue analgesia (4 cats in the S group and 1 cat in the R and RM groups) did not differ among groups (P = 0.17). The AUC of IVAS, MCPS and MNT did not differ among groups (P = 0.56, 0.64, and 0.18, respectively). Significantly lower IVAS pain scores were recorded at 1 h in the RM compared to the R and S groups (P = 0.021-0.018). There were no significant adverse effects during the study period. Conclusions: Local infiltration with RM decreased intraoperative isoflurane requirements and resulted in some evidence of improved analgesia during the early postoperative period. Neither R nor RM infiltration appeared to result in long term analgesia in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.
id UNSP_61cb71cff8f621260b721a5195be1e26
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200192
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomyAnalgesiaFelineInfiltrationLocal anestheticNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugBackground: Infiltration of the surgical site with local anesthetics combined with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may play an important role in improving perioperative pain control. This prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate intraoperative isoflurane requirements, postoperative analgesia, and adverse events of infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and combined with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Forty-five cats premedicated with acepromazine/meperidine and anesthetized with propofol/isoflurane were randomly distributed into three treatments (n = 15 per group): Physiological saline (group S), ropivacaine alone (1 mg/kg, group R) or combined with meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg, group RM) infiltrated at the surgical site (incision line, ovarian pedicles and uterus). End-tidal isoflurane concentration (FE'ISO), recorded at specific time points during surgery, was adjusted to inhibit autonomic responses to surgical stimulation. Pain was assessed using an Interactive Visual Analog Scale (IVAS), UNESP-Botucatu Multidimensional Composite Pain Scale (MCPS), and mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNT) up to 24 h post-extubation. Rescue analgesia was provided with intramuscular morphine (0.1 mg/kg) when MCPS was ≥6. Results: Area under the curve (AUC) of FE'ISO was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in the RM (17.8 ± 3.1) compared to S (23.1 ± 2.2) and R groups (22.8 ± 1.1). Hypertension (systolic arterial pressure > 160 mmHg) coinciding with surgical manipulation was observed only in cats treated with S and R (4/15 cats, P = 0.08). The number of cats receiving rescue analgesia (4 cats in the S group and 1 cat in the R and RM groups) did not differ among groups (P = 0.17). The AUC of IVAS, MCPS and MNT did not differ among groups (P = 0.56, 0.64, and 0.18, respectively). Significantly lower IVAS pain scores were recorded at 1 h in the RM compared to the R and S groups (P = 0.021-0.018). There were no significant adverse effects during the study period. Conclusions: Local infiltration with RM decreased intraoperative isoflurane requirements and resulted in some evidence of improved analgesia during the early postoperative period. Neither R nor RM infiltration appeared to result in long term analgesia in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.Postgraduate Program in Animal Science Universidade Do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária Universidade Do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)De Ol Carapeba, GabrielNicácio, Isabela P. G. A.Stelle, Ana Beatriz F.Bruno, Tatiane S.Nicácio, Gabriel M.Costa Júnior, José S.Giuffrida, RogerioTeixeira Neto, Francisco J. [UNESP]Cassu, Renata N.2020-12-12T02:00:03Z2020-12-12T02:00:03Z2020-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02303-9BMC Veterinary Research, v. 16, n. 1, 2020.1746-6148http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20019210.1186/s12917-020-02303-92-s2.0-85082017437Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBMC Veterinary Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T12:31:14Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200192Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T12:31:14Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
title Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
spellingShingle Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
De Ol Carapeba, Gabriel
Analgesia
Feline
Infiltration
Local anesthetic
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
title_short Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
title_full Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
title_fullStr Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
title_sort Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
author De Ol Carapeba, Gabriel
author_facet De Ol Carapeba, Gabriel
Nicácio, Isabela P. G. A.
Stelle, Ana Beatriz F.
Bruno, Tatiane S.
Nicácio, Gabriel M.
Costa Júnior, José S.
Giuffrida, Rogerio
Teixeira Neto, Francisco J. [UNESP]
Cassu, Renata N.
author_role author
author2 Nicácio, Isabela P. G. A.
Stelle, Ana Beatriz F.
Bruno, Tatiane S.
Nicácio, Gabriel M.
Costa Júnior, José S.
Giuffrida, Rogerio
Teixeira Neto, Francisco J. [UNESP]
Cassu, Renata N.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv De Ol Carapeba, Gabriel
Nicácio, Isabela P. G. A.
Stelle, Ana Beatriz F.
Bruno, Tatiane S.
Nicácio, Gabriel M.
Costa Júnior, José S.
Giuffrida, Rogerio
Teixeira Neto, Francisco J. [UNESP]
Cassu, Renata N.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Analgesia
Feline
Infiltration
Local anesthetic
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
topic Analgesia
Feline
Infiltration
Local anesthetic
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
description Background: Infiltration of the surgical site with local anesthetics combined with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may play an important role in improving perioperative pain control. This prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate intraoperative isoflurane requirements, postoperative analgesia, and adverse events of infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and combined with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Forty-five cats premedicated with acepromazine/meperidine and anesthetized with propofol/isoflurane were randomly distributed into three treatments (n = 15 per group): Physiological saline (group S), ropivacaine alone (1 mg/kg, group R) or combined with meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg, group RM) infiltrated at the surgical site (incision line, ovarian pedicles and uterus). End-tidal isoflurane concentration (FE'ISO), recorded at specific time points during surgery, was adjusted to inhibit autonomic responses to surgical stimulation. Pain was assessed using an Interactive Visual Analog Scale (IVAS), UNESP-Botucatu Multidimensional Composite Pain Scale (MCPS), and mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNT) up to 24 h post-extubation. Rescue analgesia was provided with intramuscular morphine (0.1 mg/kg) when MCPS was ≥6. Results: Area under the curve (AUC) of FE'ISO was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in the RM (17.8 ± 3.1) compared to S (23.1 ± 2.2) and R groups (22.8 ± 1.1). Hypertension (systolic arterial pressure > 160 mmHg) coinciding with surgical manipulation was observed only in cats treated with S and R (4/15 cats, P = 0.08). The number of cats receiving rescue analgesia (4 cats in the S group and 1 cat in the R and RM groups) did not differ among groups (P = 0.17). The AUC of IVAS, MCPS and MNT did not differ among groups (P = 0.56, 0.64, and 0.18, respectively). Significantly lower IVAS pain scores were recorded at 1 h in the RM compared to the R and S groups (P = 0.021-0.018). There were no significant adverse effects during the study period. Conclusions: Local infiltration with RM decreased intraoperative isoflurane requirements and resulted in some evidence of improved analgesia during the early postoperative period. Neither R nor RM infiltration appeared to result in long term analgesia in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T02:00:03Z
2020-12-12T02:00:03Z
2020-03-16
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02303-9
BMC Veterinary Research, v. 16, n. 1, 2020.
1746-6148
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200192
10.1186/s12917-020-02303-9
2-s2.0-85082017437
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02303-9
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200192
identifier_str_mv BMC Veterinary Research, v. 16, n. 1, 2020.
1746-6148
10.1186/s12917-020-02303-9
2-s2.0-85082017437
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv BMC Veterinary Research
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965415628079104