Bond strength of adhesive systems with different solvents to dry and wet dentin

• Autor(a) principal: da Silva, Melissa Aline [UNESP]
• Data de Publicação: 2013
• Outros Autores: Rangel, Patrícia Maria [UNESP], Barcellos, Daphne Câmara [UNESP], Pagani, Clovis [UNESP], Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes [UNESP]
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1261; http://hdl.handle.net/11449/74303
• topic: Adhesive systems; Bond strength; Dentin; Adper single bond 2; dental material; dentin bonding agent; filtek Z350; phosphoric acid; resin; Solobond M; solvent; tooth cement; water; XP Bond; XP-Bond; adhesion; animal; cattle; chemistry; classification; comparative study; dental acid etching; dental bonding; dental curing light; dental procedure; dental surgery; dentin; desiccation; equipment; materials testing; mechanical stress; methodology; polymerization; randomization; temperature; time; ultrastructure; Acid Etching, Dental; Adhesiveness; Animals; Cattle; Composite Resins; Curing Lights, Dental; Dental Bonding; Dental Cements; Dental Materials; Dental Stress Analysis; Dentin-Bonding Agents; Desiccation; Materials Testing; Phosphoric Acids; Polymerization; Random Allocation; Smear Layer; Solvents; Stress, Mechanical; Temperature; Time Factors; Water

Aim: This study evaluates bond strength between dentin and composite using adhesives with different solvents to dry and wet dentin. Materials and methods: Ninety bovine incisors were used; the vestibular surfaces were worn by the exposure of an area with a diameter of 4 mm of dentin. The specimens were divided into 6 groups, according to the type of adhesive used and hydratation stals: Group SB-wet: Single Bond 2 in wet dentin, Group SBdry: Single Bond 2 in dry dentin, Group SL-wet: Solobond M in wet dentin, Group SL-dry: Solobond M in dentin dry. Group XPwet: XP Bond in wet dentin, Group XP-dry: XP Bond in dentin dry. They were cut to obtain specimens in the shape of stick with 1 × 1 mm and subjected to microtensile test in universal testing machine with a cross speed of 1mm/min. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's tests (5%). Results: ANOVA showed significant differences for surface treatment and interaction, but no difference was found for adhesive factor. The Tukey's test showed that the samples with wet dentin shown higher values of bond strength. Conclusion: The adhesive did not influence in the bond strength. The groups with wet dentin showed higher values of bond strength than groups with dry dentin.