French maritime pine bark extract (pycnogenol) in association with triple combination cream for the treatment of facial melasma in women: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, P. B. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Dias, J. A.F. [UNESP], Esposito, A. C.C. [UNESP], Miot, L. D.B. [UNESP], Miot, H. A. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16896
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206565
Resumo: Background: Melasma can be recalcitrant to treatment, and relapses are common. Pycnogenol has been reported to be effective in treating melasma. Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of 75 mg pycnogenol taken orally twice a day vs. a placebo, in association with the triple combination and broad-spectrum sunscreen for the treatment of facial melasma. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study was conducted on 44 women with facial melasma in a single centre from May 2019 through November 2019. Patients with melasma were randomly assigned to orally take 75 mg pycnogenol (PYC) or a placebo (PLAC) twice a day for 60 days. Both groups also received tinted sunscreen [Sun Protection Factor (SPF) 50; Persistent Pigment Darkening (PPD) 17] for daytime use and a topical triple combination at bedtime. The primary outcome was a change from the baseline Modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI) score. Secondary outcomes were improvements in the patients' quality of life (MELASQoL), colorimetric indices and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Results: All participants completed the trial. The mean (SD) age of the participants was 39 (7) years, and 91% were phototypes III–IV. Both groups exhibited a reduction in mMASI scores, MELASQoL scores and colour contrast (P < 0.01). The mean (CI 95%) reductions of the mMASI scores were 49% (36–61%) for PYC and 34% (16–47%) for PLAC. The reductions in mMASI scores and colorimetric contrast were superior for the PYC group (P < 0.05). The analysis of GAIS resulted in an improvement of 86% (CI 95%: 68–96%) for the participants in the PYC group and 55% (CI 95%: 32–73%) for those in the PLAC group. There were no adverse effects related to oral treatment. Conclusion: Pycnogenol is well-tolerated and increases the effectiveness of broad-spectrum sunscreen and the triple combination in the treatment of facial melasma in women.
id UNSP_64122939dd03abe11b0f3514871977e5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206565
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling French maritime pine bark extract (pycnogenol) in association with triple combination cream for the treatment of facial melasma in women: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trialBackground: Melasma can be recalcitrant to treatment, and relapses are common. Pycnogenol has been reported to be effective in treating melasma. Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of 75 mg pycnogenol taken orally twice a day vs. a placebo, in association with the triple combination and broad-spectrum sunscreen for the treatment of facial melasma. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study was conducted on 44 women with facial melasma in a single centre from May 2019 through November 2019. Patients with melasma were randomly assigned to orally take 75 mg pycnogenol (PYC) or a placebo (PLAC) twice a day for 60 days. Both groups also received tinted sunscreen [Sun Protection Factor (SPF) 50; Persistent Pigment Darkening (PPD) 17] for daytime use and a topical triple combination at bedtime. The primary outcome was a change from the baseline Modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI) score. Secondary outcomes were improvements in the patients' quality of life (MELASQoL), colorimetric indices and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Results: All participants completed the trial. The mean (SD) age of the participants was 39 (7) years, and 91% were phototypes III–IV. Both groups exhibited a reduction in mMASI scores, MELASQoL scores and colour contrast (P < 0.01). The mean (CI 95%) reductions of the mMASI scores were 49% (36–61%) for PYC and 34% (16–47%) for PLAC. The reductions in mMASI scores and colorimetric contrast were superior for the PYC group (P < 0.05). The analysis of GAIS resulted in an improvement of 86% (CI 95%: 68–96%) for the participants in the PYC group and 55% (CI 95%: 32–73%) for those in the PLAC group. There were no adverse effects related to oral treatment. Conclusion: Pycnogenol is well-tolerated and increases the effectiveness of broad-spectrum sunscreen and the triple combination in the treatment of facial melasma in women.Departamento de Dermatologia e Radioterapia FMB-UnespDepartamento de Dermatologia e Radioterapia FMB-UnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Lima, P. B. [UNESP]Dias, J. A.F. [UNESP]Esposito, A. C.C. [UNESP]Miot, L. D.B. [UNESP]Miot, H. A. [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:34:21Z2021-06-25T10:34:21Z2021-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article502-508http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16896Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, v. 35, n. 2, p. 502-508, 2021.1468-30830926-9959http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20656510.1111/jdv.168962-s2.0-85091609983Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T07:33:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206565Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T07:33:54Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv French maritime pine bark extract (pycnogenol) in association with triple combination cream for the treatment of facial melasma in women: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
title French maritime pine bark extract (pycnogenol) in association with triple combination cream for the treatment of facial melasma in women: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
spellingShingle French maritime pine bark extract (pycnogenol) in association with triple combination cream for the treatment of facial melasma in women: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Lima, P. B. [UNESP]
title_short French maritime pine bark extract (pycnogenol) in association with triple combination cream for the treatment of facial melasma in women: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
title_full French maritime pine bark extract (pycnogenol) in association with triple combination cream for the treatment of facial melasma in women: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
title_fullStr French maritime pine bark extract (pycnogenol) in association with triple combination cream for the treatment of facial melasma in women: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed French maritime pine bark extract (pycnogenol) in association with triple combination cream for the treatment of facial melasma in women: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
title_sort French maritime pine bark extract (pycnogenol) in association with triple combination cream for the treatment of facial melasma in women: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
author Lima, P. B. [UNESP]
author_facet Lima, P. B. [UNESP]
Dias, J. A.F. [UNESP]
Esposito, A. C.C. [UNESP]
Miot, L. D.B. [UNESP]
Miot, H. A. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Dias, J. A.F. [UNESP]
Esposito, A. C.C. [UNESP]
Miot, L. D.B. [UNESP]
Miot, H. A. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, P. B. [UNESP]
Dias, J. A.F. [UNESP]
Esposito, A. C.C. [UNESP]
Miot, L. D.B. [UNESP]
Miot, H. A. [UNESP]
description Background: Melasma can be recalcitrant to treatment, and relapses are common. Pycnogenol has been reported to be effective in treating melasma. Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of 75 mg pycnogenol taken orally twice a day vs. a placebo, in association with the triple combination and broad-spectrum sunscreen for the treatment of facial melasma. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study was conducted on 44 women with facial melasma in a single centre from May 2019 through November 2019. Patients with melasma were randomly assigned to orally take 75 mg pycnogenol (PYC) or a placebo (PLAC) twice a day for 60 days. Both groups also received tinted sunscreen [Sun Protection Factor (SPF) 50; Persistent Pigment Darkening (PPD) 17] for daytime use and a topical triple combination at bedtime. The primary outcome was a change from the baseline Modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI) score. Secondary outcomes were improvements in the patients' quality of life (MELASQoL), colorimetric indices and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Results: All participants completed the trial. The mean (SD) age of the participants was 39 (7) years, and 91% were phototypes III–IV. Both groups exhibited a reduction in mMASI scores, MELASQoL scores and colour contrast (P < 0.01). The mean (CI 95%) reductions of the mMASI scores were 49% (36–61%) for PYC and 34% (16–47%) for PLAC. The reductions in mMASI scores and colorimetric contrast were superior for the PYC group (P < 0.05). The analysis of GAIS resulted in an improvement of 86% (CI 95%: 68–96%) for the participants in the PYC group and 55% (CI 95%: 32–73%) for those in the PLAC group. There were no adverse effects related to oral treatment. Conclusion: Pycnogenol is well-tolerated and increases the effectiveness of broad-spectrum sunscreen and the triple combination in the treatment of facial melasma in women.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T10:34:21Z
2021-06-25T10:34:21Z
2021-02-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16896
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, v. 35, n. 2, p. 502-508, 2021.
1468-3083
0926-9959
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206565
10.1111/jdv.16896
2-s2.0-85091609983
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16896
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206565
identifier_str_mv Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, v. 35, n. 2, p. 502-508, 2021.
1468-3083
0926-9959
10.1111/jdv.16896
2-s2.0-85091609983
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 502-508
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803650087895695360