Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6897 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231509 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: The use of methane as electron donor for denitrification addresses nitrogen removal in anaerobic effluents and can help to abate greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment plants. However, applicable rates of methanotrophic denitrification were only reached under temperature controlled conditions, and in membrane bioreactors, which are not widely available in low-income countries. In this study, polyurethane foam was used as support media in an up-flow fixed structured bed reactor (Up-FSBR). Methane was provided as the sole electron donor and carbon source to the Up-FSBR, fed with synthetic medium mimicking nitrified sewage pre-treated anaerobically and operated without temperature control or previous medium sterilization. RESULTS: The denitrification rate was 16.7 ± 6.9 mg N·day−1 and the average efficiency was 42.7 ± 14.6%. Data dispersion is linked to the operation conditions, such as temperature variation that ranged up to 18 °C in a 24 h period. The temperature variation caused a swallow in the metallic valves used in the methane input device, leading to a high fluctuation in methane availability and bubble size, influencing gas–liquid transfer. 16S rDNA sequencing revealed a complex interplay among aerobic methane oxidizers (10.8% of relative abundance), non-methanotrophic methylotrophs (7.0% RA), heterotrophic denitrifiers (14.3% RA), and microorganisms affiliated with the archaeal Methanosarcinales (13.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The Up-FSBR is a promising alternative for methanotrophic denitrification. The operation challenges are linked with methane input rather than with the reactor configuration. The Up-FSBR was efficient in selecting a microbial community that is capable of performing methane oxidation and heterotrophic denitrification. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI). |
id |
UNSP_665715760fc9fa84de5490dbac75e13d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/231509 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areasanaerobic wastewater treatmentimmobilized biomassmethane oxidationnutrient pollutionBACKGROUND: The use of methane as electron donor for denitrification addresses nitrogen removal in anaerobic effluents and can help to abate greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment plants. However, applicable rates of methanotrophic denitrification were only reached under temperature controlled conditions, and in membrane bioreactors, which are not widely available in low-income countries. In this study, polyurethane foam was used as support media in an up-flow fixed structured bed reactor (Up-FSBR). Methane was provided as the sole electron donor and carbon source to the Up-FSBR, fed with synthetic medium mimicking nitrified sewage pre-treated anaerobically and operated without temperature control or previous medium sterilization. RESULTS: The denitrification rate was 16.7 ± 6.9 mg N·day−1 and the average efficiency was 42.7 ± 14.6%. Data dispersion is linked to the operation conditions, such as temperature variation that ranged up to 18 °C in a 24 h period. The temperature variation caused a swallow in the metallic valves used in the methane input device, leading to a high fluctuation in methane availability and bubble size, influencing gas–liquid transfer. 16S rDNA sequencing revealed a complex interplay among aerobic methane oxidizers (10.8% of relative abundance), non-methanotrophic methylotrophs (7.0% RA), heterotrophic denitrifiers (14.3% RA), and microorganisms affiliated with the archaeal Methanosarcinales (13.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The Up-FSBR is a promising alternative for methanotrophic denitrification. The operation challenges are linked with methane input rather than with the reactor configuration. The Up-FSBR was efficient in selecting a microbial community that is capable of performing methane oxidation and heterotrophic denitrification. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).Biological Processes Laboratory Department of Hydraulics and Sanitation São Carlos School of Engineering (EESC) University of Sao Paulo (USP) Engenharia AmbientalSchool of Technology University of CampinasDepartment of Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry Institute of Chemistry, São Paulo State University. R. Francisco Degni, 55Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Costa, Rachel BOkada, Dagoberto YForesti, Eugenio2022-04-29T08:45:53Z2022-04-29T08:45:53Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6897Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology.1097-46600268-2575http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23150910.1002/jctb.68972-s2.0-85115030342Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-29T08:45:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/231509Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:00:51.048952Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas |
title |
Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas |
spellingShingle |
Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas Costa, Rachel B anaerobic wastewater treatment immobilized biomass methane oxidation nutrient pollution |
title_short |
Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas |
title_full |
Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas |
title_fullStr |
Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas |
title_sort |
Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas |
author |
Costa, Rachel B |
author_facet |
Costa, Rachel B Okada, Dagoberto Y Foresti, Eugenio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Okada, Dagoberto Y Foresti, Eugenio |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Rachel B Okada, Dagoberto Y Foresti, Eugenio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
anaerobic wastewater treatment immobilized biomass methane oxidation nutrient pollution |
topic |
anaerobic wastewater treatment immobilized biomass methane oxidation nutrient pollution |
description |
BACKGROUND: The use of methane as electron donor for denitrification addresses nitrogen removal in anaerobic effluents and can help to abate greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment plants. However, applicable rates of methanotrophic denitrification were only reached under temperature controlled conditions, and in membrane bioreactors, which are not widely available in low-income countries. In this study, polyurethane foam was used as support media in an up-flow fixed structured bed reactor (Up-FSBR). Methane was provided as the sole electron donor and carbon source to the Up-FSBR, fed with synthetic medium mimicking nitrified sewage pre-treated anaerobically and operated without temperature control or previous medium sterilization. RESULTS: The denitrification rate was 16.7 ± 6.9 mg N·day−1 and the average efficiency was 42.7 ± 14.6%. Data dispersion is linked to the operation conditions, such as temperature variation that ranged up to 18 °C in a 24 h period. The temperature variation caused a swallow in the metallic valves used in the methane input device, leading to a high fluctuation in methane availability and bubble size, influencing gas–liquid transfer. 16S rDNA sequencing revealed a complex interplay among aerobic methane oxidizers (10.8% of relative abundance), non-methanotrophic methylotrophs (7.0% RA), heterotrophic denitrifiers (14.3% RA), and microorganisms affiliated with the archaeal Methanosarcinales (13.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The Up-FSBR is a promising alternative for methanotrophic denitrification. The operation challenges are linked with methane input rather than with the reactor configuration. The Up-FSBR was efficient in selecting a microbial community that is capable of performing methane oxidation and heterotrophic denitrification. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI). |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 2022-04-29T08:45:53Z 2022-04-29T08:45:53Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6897 Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 1097-4660 0268-2575 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231509 10.1002/jctb.6897 2-s2.0-85115030342 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6897 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231509 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 1097-4660 0268-2575 10.1002/jctb.6897 2-s2.0-85115030342 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129481744842752 |