Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Rachel B
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Okada, Dagoberto Y, Foresti, Eugenio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6897
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231509
Resumo: BACKGROUND: The use of methane as electron donor for denitrification addresses nitrogen removal in anaerobic effluents and can help to abate greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment plants. However, applicable rates of methanotrophic denitrification were only reached under temperature controlled conditions, and in membrane bioreactors, which are not widely available in low-income countries. In this study, polyurethane foam was used as support media in an up-flow fixed structured bed reactor (Up-FSBR). Methane was provided as the sole electron donor and carbon source to the Up-FSBR, fed with synthetic medium mimicking nitrified sewage pre-treated anaerobically and operated without temperature control or previous medium sterilization. RESULTS: The denitrification rate was 16.7 ± 6.9 mg N·day−1 and the average efficiency was 42.7 ± 14.6%. Data dispersion is linked to the operation conditions, such as temperature variation that ranged up to 18 °C in a 24 h period. The temperature variation caused a swallow in the metallic valves used in the methane input device, leading to a high fluctuation in methane availability and bubble size, influencing gas–liquid transfer. 16S rDNA sequencing revealed a complex interplay among aerobic methane oxidizers (10.8% of relative abundance), non-methanotrophic methylotrophs (7.0% RA), heterotrophic denitrifiers (14.3% RA), and microorganisms affiliated with the archaeal Methanosarcinales (13.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The Up-FSBR is a promising alternative for methanotrophic denitrification. The operation challenges are linked with methane input rather than with the reactor configuration. The Up-FSBR was efficient in selecting a microbial community that is capable of performing methane oxidation and heterotrophic denitrification. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).
id UNSP_665715760fc9fa84de5490dbac75e13d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/231509
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areasanaerobic wastewater treatmentimmobilized biomassmethane oxidationnutrient pollutionBACKGROUND: The use of methane as electron donor for denitrification addresses nitrogen removal in anaerobic effluents and can help to abate greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment plants. However, applicable rates of methanotrophic denitrification were only reached under temperature controlled conditions, and in membrane bioreactors, which are not widely available in low-income countries. In this study, polyurethane foam was used as support media in an up-flow fixed structured bed reactor (Up-FSBR). Methane was provided as the sole electron donor and carbon source to the Up-FSBR, fed with synthetic medium mimicking nitrified sewage pre-treated anaerobically and operated without temperature control or previous medium sterilization. RESULTS: The denitrification rate was 16.7 ± 6.9 mg N·day−1 and the average efficiency was 42.7 ± 14.6%. Data dispersion is linked to the operation conditions, such as temperature variation that ranged up to 18 °C in a 24 h period. The temperature variation caused a swallow in the metallic valves used in the methane input device, leading to a high fluctuation in methane availability and bubble size, influencing gas–liquid transfer. 16S rDNA sequencing revealed a complex interplay among aerobic methane oxidizers (10.8% of relative abundance), non-methanotrophic methylotrophs (7.0% RA), heterotrophic denitrifiers (14.3% RA), and microorganisms affiliated with the archaeal Methanosarcinales (13.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The Up-FSBR is a promising alternative for methanotrophic denitrification. The operation challenges are linked with methane input rather than with the reactor configuration. The Up-FSBR was efficient in selecting a microbial community that is capable of performing methane oxidation and heterotrophic denitrification. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).Biological Processes Laboratory Department of Hydraulics and Sanitation São Carlos School of Engineering (EESC) University of Sao Paulo (USP) Engenharia AmbientalSchool of Technology University of CampinasDepartment of Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry Institute of Chemistry, São Paulo State University. R. Francisco Degni, 55Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Costa, Rachel BOkada, Dagoberto YForesti, Eugenio2022-04-29T08:45:53Z2022-04-29T08:45:53Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6897Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology.1097-46600268-2575http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23150910.1002/jctb.68972-s2.0-85115030342Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-29T08:45:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/231509Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:00:51.048952Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas
title Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas
spellingShingle Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas
Costa, Rachel B
anaerobic wastewater treatment
immobilized biomass
methane oxidation
nutrient pollution
title_short Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas
title_full Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas
title_fullStr Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas
title_full_unstemmed Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas
title_sort Practical implications of methanotrophic denitrification as post-treatment unit of anaerobic effluents in tropical areas
author Costa, Rachel B
author_facet Costa, Rachel B
Okada, Dagoberto Y
Foresti, Eugenio
author_role author
author2 Okada, Dagoberto Y
Foresti, Eugenio
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Rachel B
Okada, Dagoberto Y
Foresti, Eugenio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv anaerobic wastewater treatment
immobilized biomass
methane oxidation
nutrient pollution
topic anaerobic wastewater treatment
immobilized biomass
methane oxidation
nutrient pollution
description BACKGROUND: The use of methane as electron donor for denitrification addresses nitrogen removal in anaerobic effluents and can help to abate greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment plants. However, applicable rates of methanotrophic denitrification were only reached under temperature controlled conditions, and in membrane bioreactors, which are not widely available in low-income countries. In this study, polyurethane foam was used as support media in an up-flow fixed structured bed reactor (Up-FSBR). Methane was provided as the sole electron donor and carbon source to the Up-FSBR, fed with synthetic medium mimicking nitrified sewage pre-treated anaerobically and operated without temperature control or previous medium sterilization. RESULTS: The denitrification rate was 16.7 ± 6.9 mg N·day−1 and the average efficiency was 42.7 ± 14.6%. Data dispersion is linked to the operation conditions, such as temperature variation that ranged up to 18 °C in a 24 h period. The temperature variation caused a swallow in the metallic valves used in the methane input device, leading to a high fluctuation in methane availability and bubble size, influencing gas–liquid transfer. 16S rDNA sequencing revealed a complex interplay among aerobic methane oxidizers (10.8% of relative abundance), non-methanotrophic methylotrophs (7.0% RA), heterotrophic denitrifiers (14.3% RA), and microorganisms affiliated with the archaeal Methanosarcinales (13.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The Up-FSBR is a promising alternative for methanotrophic denitrification. The operation challenges are linked with methane input rather than with the reactor configuration. The Up-FSBR was efficient in selecting a microbial community that is capable of performing methane oxidation and heterotrophic denitrification. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
2022-04-29T08:45:53Z
2022-04-29T08:45:53Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6897
Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology.
1097-4660
0268-2575
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231509
10.1002/jctb.6897
2-s2.0-85115030342
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6897
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231509
identifier_str_mv Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology.
1097-4660
0268-2575
10.1002/jctb.6897
2-s2.0-85115030342
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129481744842752