Comparison of different irrigants in the removal of endotoxins and cultivable microorganisms from infected root canals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Valera, Marcia Carneiro [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Cardoso, Flávia Goulart da Rosa [UNESP], Chung, Adriana [UNESP], Xavier, Ana Cláudia Carvalho [UNESP], Figueiredo, Mariana Diehl [UNESP], Martinho, Frederico Canato [UNESP], Palo, Renato Miotto [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/125636
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/131300
Resumo: This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of different irrigants used to remove endotoxins and cultivable microorganisms during endodontic therapy. Forty root canals were contaminated and divided into groups according to the irrigant: 2% NaOCl + surfactant, 2% CHX, 2.5% NaOCl, and pyrogen-free saline solution (control). Samples were collected after root canal contamination (S1), after instrumentation (S2), and 7 days after instrumentation (S3). Microorganisms and endotoxins were recovered from 100% of the contaminated root canals (S1). At S2, 2% NaOCl + surfactant, 2% CHX, and 2.5% NaOCl were able to completely eliminate cultivable microorganisms. At S3, both 2% CHX and 2.5% NaOCl were effective in preventing C. albicans and E. coli regrowth, but E. faecalis was still detected. No microorganism species was recovered from root canals instrumented with 2% NaOCl + surfactant. At S2, a higher percentage value of endotoxin reduction was found for 2% NaOCl + surfactant (99.3%) compared to 2% CHX (98.9%) and 2.5% NaOCl (97.18%) (p < 0.05). Moreover, at S3, 2% NaOCl + surfactant (100%) was the most effective irrigant against endotoxins. All irrigants tested were effective in reducing microorganisms and endotoxins from root canals. Moreover, 2% NaOCl + surfactant was the most effective irrigant against endotoxins and regrowth of microorganisms.
id UNSP_684ec9ca34577a304883deb590ea054a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/131300
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparison of different irrigants in the removal of endotoxins and cultivable microorganisms from infected root canalsThis study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of different irrigants used to remove endotoxins and cultivable microorganisms during endodontic therapy. Forty root canals were contaminated and divided into groups according to the irrigant: 2% NaOCl + surfactant, 2% CHX, 2.5% NaOCl, and pyrogen-free saline solution (control). Samples were collected after root canal contamination (S1), after instrumentation (S2), and 7 days after instrumentation (S3). Microorganisms and endotoxins were recovered from 100% of the contaminated root canals (S1). At S2, 2% NaOCl + surfactant, 2% CHX, and 2.5% NaOCl were able to completely eliminate cultivable microorganisms. At S3, both 2% CHX and 2.5% NaOCl were effective in preventing C. albicans and E. coli regrowth, but E. faecalis was still detected. No microorganism species was recovered from root canals instrumented with 2% NaOCl + surfactant. At S2, a higher percentage value of endotoxin reduction was found for 2% NaOCl + surfactant (99.3%) compared to 2% CHX (98.9%) and 2.5% NaOCl (97.18%) (p < 0.05). Moreover, at S3, 2% NaOCl + surfactant (100%) was the most effective irrigant against endotoxins. All irrigants tested were effective in reducing microorganisms and endotoxins from root canals. Moreover, 2% NaOCl + surfactant was the most effective irrigant against endotoxins and regrowth of microorganisms.Universidade Estadual Paulista, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia de São José dos CamposUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Valera, Marcia Carneiro [UNESP]Cardoso, Flávia Goulart da Rosa [UNESP]Chung, Adriana [UNESP]Xavier, Ana Cláudia Carvalho [UNESP]Figueiredo, Mariana Diehl [UNESP]Martinho, Frederico Canato [UNESP]Palo, Renato Miotto [UNESP]2015-12-07T15:33:36Z2015-12-07T15:33:36Z2015info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/125636Thescientificworldjournal, v. 2015, 2015.1537-744Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/13130010.1155/2015/125636PMC4546762.pdf436329736874627326346574PMC4546762PubMedreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengThescientificworldjournalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-31T06:07:29Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/131300Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:30:42.429265Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of different irrigants in the removal of endotoxins and cultivable microorganisms from infected root canals
title Comparison of different irrigants in the removal of endotoxins and cultivable microorganisms from infected root canals
spellingShingle Comparison of different irrigants in the removal of endotoxins and cultivable microorganisms from infected root canals
Valera, Marcia Carneiro [UNESP]
title_short Comparison of different irrigants in the removal of endotoxins and cultivable microorganisms from infected root canals
title_full Comparison of different irrigants in the removal of endotoxins and cultivable microorganisms from infected root canals
title_fullStr Comparison of different irrigants in the removal of endotoxins and cultivable microorganisms from infected root canals
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different irrigants in the removal of endotoxins and cultivable microorganisms from infected root canals
title_sort Comparison of different irrigants in the removal of endotoxins and cultivable microorganisms from infected root canals
author Valera, Marcia Carneiro [UNESP]
author_facet Valera, Marcia Carneiro [UNESP]
Cardoso, Flávia Goulart da Rosa [UNESP]
Chung, Adriana [UNESP]
Xavier, Ana Cláudia Carvalho [UNESP]
Figueiredo, Mariana Diehl [UNESP]
Martinho, Frederico Canato [UNESP]
Palo, Renato Miotto [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Cardoso, Flávia Goulart da Rosa [UNESP]
Chung, Adriana [UNESP]
Xavier, Ana Cláudia Carvalho [UNESP]
Figueiredo, Mariana Diehl [UNESP]
Martinho, Frederico Canato [UNESP]
Palo, Renato Miotto [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Valera, Marcia Carneiro [UNESP]
Cardoso, Flávia Goulart da Rosa [UNESP]
Chung, Adriana [UNESP]
Xavier, Ana Cláudia Carvalho [UNESP]
Figueiredo, Mariana Diehl [UNESP]
Martinho, Frederico Canato [UNESP]
Palo, Renato Miotto [UNESP]
description This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of different irrigants used to remove endotoxins and cultivable microorganisms during endodontic therapy. Forty root canals were contaminated and divided into groups according to the irrigant: 2% NaOCl + surfactant, 2% CHX, 2.5% NaOCl, and pyrogen-free saline solution (control). Samples were collected after root canal contamination (S1), after instrumentation (S2), and 7 days after instrumentation (S3). Microorganisms and endotoxins were recovered from 100% of the contaminated root canals (S1). At S2, 2% NaOCl + surfactant, 2% CHX, and 2.5% NaOCl were able to completely eliminate cultivable microorganisms. At S3, both 2% CHX and 2.5% NaOCl were effective in preventing C. albicans and E. coli regrowth, but E. faecalis was still detected. No microorganism species was recovered from root canals instrumented with 2% NaOCl + surfactant. At S2, a higher percentage value of endotoxin reduction was found for 2% NaOCl + surfactant (99.3%) compared to 2% CHX (98.9%) and 2.5% NaOCl (97.18%) (p < 0.05). Moreover, at S3, 2% NaOCl + surfactant (100%) was the most effective irrigant against endotoxins. All irrigants tested were effective in reducing microorganisms and endotoxins from root canals. Moreover, 2% NaOCl + surfactant was the most effective irrigant against endotoxins and regrowth of microorganisms.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-07T15:33:36Z
2015-12-07T15:33:36Z
2015
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/125636
Thescientificworldjournal, v. 2015, 2015.
1537-744X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/131300
10.1155/2015/125636
PMC4546762.pdf
4363297368746273
26346574
PMC4546762
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/125636
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/131300
identifier_str_mv Thescientificworldjournal, v. 2015, 2015.
1537-744X
10.1155/2015/125636
PMC4546762.pdf
4363297368746273
26346574
PMC4546762
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Thescientificworldjournal
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv PubMed
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128663816765440