Comparison between nerve conduction study and high-resolution ultrasonography with color doppler in type 1 and type 2 leprosy reactions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Akita, J.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Miller, L. H. G., Mello, F. M. C., Barreto, J. A., Moreira, A. L., Salgado, M. H., Kirchner, D. R., Garbino, J. A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2021.02.003
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218865
Resumo: Objective: To analyze the role of high-resolution ultrasonography with color Doppler (HRUS with CD) to diagnose inflammatory activity (IA) in nerves of leprosy patients under type 1 (RT1) and 2 (RT2) reactions compared to Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS). Methods: Leprosy patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of neuritis (RT1 and RT2) without corticosteroids use were selected. They were evaluated by NCS and subsequently by HRUS with CD. Subacute segmental demyelination and the presence of blood flow, respectively, were considered signs of IA. The two methods were compared for their ability to diagnose patients with leprosy reactions. Results: A total of 257 nerves from 35 patients were evaluated. NCS and HRUS with CD diagnosed IA in 68% and 74% of patients, respectively. When both methods were used concomitantly, the diagnosis rate was 91.4%. HRUS with CD was particular helpful when there was minimal neurophysiological compromise in NCS or when motor potentials were not detected. Conclusion: HRUS with CD was able to detect leprosy reactions, especially when combined with NCS. It was especially useful in two opposite situations: nerves with only minor changes and those without motor response in NCS. Significance: Our data shows the usefulness of HRUS and CD, similar to NCS, as a tool to diagnose leprosy reactions. (C) 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V.
id UNSP_68b52bfb3ec5b8c251661162cb52ee59
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/218865
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparison between nerve conduction study and high-resolution ultrasonography with color doppler in type 1 and type 2 leprosy reactionsLeprosy neuropathyNerve conduction studiesHigh-resolution ultrasonography and ColorDopplerLeprosy reactionsObjective: To analyze the role of high-resolution ultrasonography with color Doppler (HRUS with CD) to diagnose inflammatory activity (IA) in nerves of leprosy patients under type 1 (RT1) and 2 (RT2) reactions compared to Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS). Methods: Leprosy patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of neuritis (RT1 and RT2) without corticosteroids use were selected. They were evaluated by NCS and subsequently by HRUS with CD. Subacute segmental demyelination and the presence of blood flow, respectively, were considered signs of IA. The two methods were compared for their ability to diagnose patients with leprosy reactions. Results: A total of 257 nerves from 35 patients were evaluated. NCS and HRUS with CD diagnosed IA in 68% and 74% of patients, respectively. When both methods were used concomitantly, the diagnosis rate was 91.4%. HRUS with CD was particular helpful when there was minimal neurophysiological compromise in NCS or when motor potentials were not detected. Conclusion: HRUS with CD was able to detect leprosy reactions, especially when combined with NCS. It was especially useful in two opposite situations: nerves with only minor changes and those without motor response in NCS. Significance: Our data shows the usefulness of HRUS and CD, similar to NCS, as a tool to diagnose leprosy reactions. (C) 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V.Lauro Souza Lima Inst, Neurophysiol Div, Bauru, SP, BrazilElsevier B.V.Lauro Souza Lima InstUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Akita, J.Miller, L. H. G.Mello, F. M. C.Barreto, J. A.Moreira, A. L.Salgado, M. H.Kirchner, D. R.Garbino, J. A.2022-04-28T17:30:16Z2022-04-28T17:30:16Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article97-102http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2021.02.003Clinical Neurophysiology Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 6, p. 97-102, 2021.2467-981Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/21886510.1016/j.cnp.2021.02.003WOS:000704863500015Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengClinical Neurophysiology Practiceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-25T17:40:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/218865Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-04-25T17:40:19Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between nerve conduction study and high-resolution ultrasonography with color doppler in type 1 and type 2 leprosy reactions
title Comparison between nerve conduction study and high-resolution ultrasonography with color doppler in type 1 and type 2 leprosy reactions
spellingShingle Comparison between nerve conduction study and high-resolution ultrasonography with color doppler in type 1 and type 2 leprosy reactions
Akita, J.
Leprosy neuropathy
Nerve conduction studies
High-resolution ultrasonography and Color
Doppler
Leprosy reactions
title_short Comparison between nerve conduction study and high-resolution ultrasonography with color doppler in type 1 and type 2 leprosy reactions
title_full Comparison between nerve conduction study and high-resolution ultrasonography with color doppler in type 1 and type 2 leprosy reactions
title_fullStr Comparison between nerve conduction study and high-resolution ultrasonography with color doppler in type 1 and type 2 leprosy reactions
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between nerve conduction study and high-resolution ultrasonography with color doppler in type 1 and type 2 leprosy reactions
title_sort Comparison between nerve conduction study and high-resolution ultrasonography with color doppler in type 1 and type 2 leprosy reactions
author Akita, J.
author_facet Akita, J.
Miller, L. H. G.
Mello, F. M. C.
Barreto, J. A.
Moreira, A. L.
Salgado, M. H.
Kirchner, D. R.
Garbino, J. A.
author_role author
author2 Miller, L. H. G.
Mello, F. M. C.
Barreto, J. A.
Moreira, A. L.
Salgado, M. H.
Kirchner, D. R.
Garbino, J. A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Lauro Souza Lima Inst
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Akita, J.
Miller, L. H. G.
Mello, F. M. C.
Barreto, J. A.
Moreira, A. L.
Salgado, M. H.
Kirchner, D. R.
Garbino, J. A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Leprosy neuropathy
Nerve conduction studies
High-resolution ultrasonography and Color
Doppler
Leprosy reactions
topic Leprosy neuropathy
Nerve conduction studies
High-resolution ultrasonography and Color
Doppler
Leprosy reactions
description Objective: To analyze the role of high-resolution ultrasonography with color Doppler (HRUS with CD) to diagnose inflammatory activity (IA) in nerves of leprosy patients under type 1 (RT1) and 2 (RT2) reactions compared to Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS). Methods: Leprosy patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of neuritis (RT1 and RT2) without corticosteroids use were selected. They were evaluated by NCS and subsequently by HRUS with CD. Subacute segmental demyelination and the presence of blood flow, respectively, were considered signs of IA. The two methods were compared for their ability to diagnose patients with leprosy reactions. Results: A total of 257 nerves from 35 patients were evaluated. NCS and HRUS with CD diagnosed IA in 68% and 74% of patients, respectively. When both methods were used concomitantly, the diagnosis rate was 91.4%. HRUS with CD was particular helpful when there was minimal neurophysiological compromise in NCS or when motor potentials were not detected. Conclusion: HRUS with CD was able to detect leprosy reactions, especially when combined with NCS. It was especially useful in two opposite situations: nerves with only minor changes and those without motor response in NCS. Significance: Our data shows the usefulness of HRUS and CD, similar to NCS, as a tool to diagnose leprosy reactions. (C) 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
2022-04-28T17:30:16Z
2022-04-28T17:30:16Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2021.02.003
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 6, p. 97-102, 2021.
2467-981X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218865
10.1016/j.cnp.2021.02.003
WOS:000704863500015
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2021.02.003
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218865
identifier_str_mv Clinical Neurophysiology Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 6, p. 97-102, 2021.
2467-981X
10.1016/j.cnp.2021.02.003
WOS:000704863500015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 97-102
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803047119275163648