Preference index supported by motivation tests in Nile tilapia

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maia, Caroline Marques
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Volpato, Gilson Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175821
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177156
Resumo: The identification of animal preferences is assumed to provide better rearing environments for the animals in question. Preference tests focus on the frequency of approaches or the time an animal spends in proximity to each item of the investigated resource during a multiple-choice trial. Recently, a preference index (PI) was proposed to differentiate animal preferences from momentary responses (Sci Rep, 2016, 6:28328, DOI: 10.1038/srep28328). This index also quantifies the degree of preference for each item. Each choice response is also weighted, with the most recent responses weighted more heavily, but the index includes the entire bank of tests, and thus represents a history-based approach. In this study, we compared this PI to motivation tests, which consider how much effort is expended to access a resource. We performed choice tests over 7 consecutive days for 34 Nile tilapia fish that presented with different colored compartments in each test. We first detected the preferred and non-preferred colors of each fish using the PI and then tested their motivation to reach these compartments. We found that fish preferences varied individually, but the results were consistent with the motivation profiles, as individual fish were more motivated (the number of touches made on transparent, hinged doors that prevented access to the resource) to access their preferred items. On average, most of the 34 fish avoided the color yellow and showed less motivation to reach yellow and red colors. The fish also exhibited greater motivation to access blue and green colors (the most preferred colors). These results corroborate the PI as a reliable tool for the identification of animal preferences. We recommend this index to animal keepers and researchers to identify an animal's preferred conditions.
id UNSP_68ccd317ec91950867321d56bfd37ca7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/177156
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Preference index supported by motivation tests in Nile tilapiaThe identification of animal preferences is assumed to provide better rearing environments for the animals in question. Preference tests focus on the frequency of approaches or the time an animal spends in proximity to each item of the investigated resource during a multiple-choice trial. Recently, a preference index (PI) was proposed to differentiate animal preferences from momentary responses (Sci Rep, 2016, 6:28328, DOI: 10.1038/srep28328). This index also quantifies the degree of preference for each item. Each choice response is also weighted, with the most recent responses weighted more heavily, but the index includes the entire bank of tests, and thus represents a history-based approach. In this study, we compared this PI to motivation tests, which consider how much effort is expended to access a resource. We performed choice tests over 7 consecutive days for 34 Nile tilapia fish that presented with different colored compartments in each test. We first detected the preferred and non-preferred colors of each fish using the PI and then tested their motivation to reach these compartments. We found that fish preferences varied individually, but the results were consistent with the motivation profiles, as individual fish were more motivated (the number of touches made on transparent, hinged doors that prevented access to the resource) to access their preferred items. On average, most of the 34 fish avoided the color yellow and showed less motivation to reach yellow and red colors. The fish also exhibited greater motivation to access blue and green colors (the most preferred colors). These results corroborate the PI as a reliable tool for the identification of animal preferences. We recommend this index to animal keepers and researchers to identify an animal's preferred conditions.Laboratory of Animal Physiology and Behavior, Institute of Biosciences (IB), UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Maia, Caroline MarquesVolpato, Gilson Luiz2018-12-11T17:24:15Z2018-12-11T17:24:15Z2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlee0175821application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175821PloS one, v. 12, n. 4, p. e0175821-, 2017.1932-6203http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17715610.1371/journal.pone.01758212-s2.0-850491873772-s2.0-85049187377.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPloS one1,164info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-17T06:16:41Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/177156Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-17T06:16:41Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Preference index supported by motivation tests in Nile tilapia
title Preference index supported by motivation tests in Nile tilapia
spellingShingle Preference index supported by motivation tests in Nile tilapia
Maia, Caroline Marques
title_short Preference index supported by motivation tests in Nile tilapia
title_full Preference index supported by motivation tests in Nile tilapia
title_fullStr Preference index supported by motivation tests in Nile tilapia
title_full_unstemmed Preference index supported by motivation tests in Nile tilapia
title_sort Preference index supported by motivation tests in Nile tilapia
author Maia, Caroline Marques
author_facet Maia, Caroline Marques
Volpato, Gilson Luiz
author_role author
author2 Volpato, Gilson Luiz
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maia, Caroline Marques
Volpato, Gilson Luiz
description The identification of animal preferences is assumed to provide better rearing environments for the animals in question. Preference tests focus on the frequency of approaches or the time an animal spends in proximity to each item of the investigated resource during a multiple-choice trial. Recently, a preference index (PI) was proposed to differentiate animal preferences from momentary responses (Sci Rep, 2016, 6:28328, DOI: 10.1038/srep28328). This index also quantifies the degree of preference for each item. Each choice response is also weighted, with the most recent responses weighted more heavily, but the index includes the entire bank of tests, and thus represents a history-based approach. In this study, we compared this PI to motivation tests, which consider how much effort is expended to access a resource. We performed choice tests over 7 consecutive days for 34 Nile tilapia fish that presented with different colored compartments in each test. We first detected the preferred and non-preferred colors of each fish using the PI and then tested their motivation to reach these compartments. We found that fish preferences varied individually, but the results were consistent with the motivation profiles, as individual fish were more motivated (the number of touches made on transparent, hinged doors that prevented access to the resource) to access their preferred items. On average, most of the 34 fish avoided the color yellow and showed less motivation to reach yellow and red colors. The fish also exhibited greater motivation to access blue and green colors (the most preferred colors). These results corroborate the PI as a reliable tool for the identification of animal preferences. We recommend this index to animal keepers and researchers to identify an animal's preferred conditions.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
2018-12-11T17:24:15Z
2018-12-11T17:24:15Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175821
PloS one, v. 12, n. 4, p. e0175821-, 2017.
1932-6203
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177156
10.1371/journal.pone.0175821
2-s2.0-85049187377
2-s2.0-85049187377.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175821
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177156
identifier_str_mv PloS one, v. 12, n. 4, p. e0175821-, 2017.
1932-6203
10.1371/journal.pone.0175821
2-s2.0-85049187377
2-s2.0-85049187377.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv PloS one
1,164
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv e0175821
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803650007940726784