Influence of imposed optic flow characteristics and intention on postural responses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barela, Ana M. F.
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Barelá, Jose A., Rlnaldi, Natália M. [UNESP], Toledo, Diana R. De [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/mcj.13.2.119
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/225472
Resumo: This study examined the influence of both optic flow characteristics and intention on postural control responses. Two groups of 10 adults each were exposed to the room's movement either at 0.6 cm/s (low velocity group) or 1.0 cm/s (high velocity group). All the participants stood in the upright stance inside of a moving room and were informed about the room movement only after the fourth trial as they were asked to resist to its influence. Results revealed that participants from both groups were influenced by the imposed visual stimulus in the first trials, but the coupling strength was weaker for the high velocity group. The request to resist the visual influences decreased visual influences on body sway, but only for the low velocity group. These results indicate that intention might play a role in stimulus influences on body sway but it is stimulus dependent. © 2009 Human Kinetics, Inc.
id UNSP_69dbad7629aefb24b526075e7ed5ced5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/225472
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Influence of imposed optic flow characteristics and intention on postural responsesMoving roomPerception-actionPostural controlVisionThis study examined the influence of both optic flow characteristics and intention on postural control responses. Two groups of 10 adults each were exposed to the room's movement either at 0.6 cm/s (low velocity group) or 1.0 cm/s (high velocity group). All the participants stood in the upright stance inside of a moving room and were informed about the room movement only after the fourth trial as they were asked to resist to its influence. Results revealed that participants from both groups were influenced by the imposed visual stimulus in the first trials, but the coupling strength was weaker for the high velocity group. The request to resist the visual influences decreased visual influences on body sway, but only for the low velocity group. These results indicate that intention might play a role in stimulus influences on body sway but it is stimulus dependent. © 2009 Human Kinetics, Inc.Instituto de Ciências da Atividade Física e Esporte Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul, São Paulo, SPLaboratório para Estudos do Movimento Universidade Estadual Paulista IB Departamento de Edueacão Física, Rio Claro, SPLaboratório para Estudos do Movimento Universidade Estadual Paulista IB Departamento de Edueacão Física, Rio Claro, SPUniversidade Cruzeiro do SulUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Barela, Ana M. F.Barelá, Jose A.Rlnaldi, Natália M. [UNESP]Toledo, Diana R. De [UNESP]2022-04-28T20:51:53Z2022-04-28T20:51:53Z2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article119-129http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/mcj.13.2.119Motor Control, v. 13, n. 2, p. 119-129, 2009.1543-26961087-1640http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22547210.1123/mcj.13.2.1192-s2.0-65649102630Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengMotor Controlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T20:51:53Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/225472Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:07:29.057239Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of imposed optic flow characteristics and intention on postural responses
title Influence of imposed optic flow characteristics and intention on postural responses
spellingShingle Influence of imposed optic flow characteristics and intention on postural responses
Barela, Ana M. F.
Moving room
Perception-action
Postural control
Vision
title_short Influence of imposed optic flow characteristics and intention on postural responses
title_full Influence of imposed optic flow characteristics and intention on postural responses
title_fullStr Influence of imposed optic flow characteristics and intention on postural responses
title_full_unstemmed Influence of imposed optic flow characteristics and intention on postural responses
title_sort Influence of imposed optic flow characteristics and intention on postural responses
author Barela, Ana M. F.
author_facet Barela, Ana M. F.
Barelá, Jose A.
Rlnaldi, Natália M. [UNESP]
Toledo, Diana R. De [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Barelá, Jose A.
Rlnaldi, Natália M. [UNESP]
Toledo, Diana R. De [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barela, Ana M. F.
Barelá, Jose A.
Rlnaldi, Natália M. [UNESP]
Toledo, Diana R. De [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Moving room
Perception-action
Postural control
Vision
topic Moving room
Perception-action
Postural control
Vision
description This study examined the influence of both optic flow characteristics and intention on postural control responses. Two groups of 10 adults each were exposed to the room's movement either at 0.6 cm/s (low velocity group) or 1.0 cm/s (high velocity group). All the participants stood in the upright stance inside of a moving room and were informed about the room movement only after the fourth trial as they were asked to resist to its influence. Results revealed that participants from both groups were influenced by the imposed visual stimulus in the first trials, but the coupling strength was weaker for the high velocity group. The request to resist the visual influences decreased visual influences on body sway, but only for the low velocity group. These results indicate that intention might play a role in stimulus influences on body sway but it is stimulus dependent. © 2009 Human Kinetics, Inc.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-01-01
2022-04-28T20:51:53Z
2022-04-28T20:51:53Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/mcj.13.2.119
Motor Control, v. 13, n. 2, p. 119-129, 2009.
1543-2696
1087-1640
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/225472
10.1123/mcj.13.2.119
2-s2.0-65649102630
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/mcj.13.2.119
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/225472
identifier_str_mv Motor Control, v. 13, n. 2, p. 119-129, 2009.
1543-2696
1087-1640
10.1123/mcj.13.2.119
2-s2.0-65649102630
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Motor Control
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 119-129
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129162397876224