Recuperação de biomassa bacteriana produzida no tratamento de efluente industrial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Leandro Kanamaru Franco de
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Ponsano, Elisa Helena Giglio [UNESP], Pinto, Marcos Franke [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.18539/CAST.V17I4.2081
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/133025
Resumo: Recently, there has been an increasing search for alternative ways to treat industrial wastewater. The cultivation of phototrophic microorganisms in those effluents represents an attractive biotechnological alternative because it reduces the pollutant load and provides a useful biomass. However, for the removal of the cell mass provided by the process, it is necessary to use specific technologies. In this work, Rubrivivax gelatinosus was cultivated in wastewaters from fish slaughter and processing and the biomass was recuperated by two distinct methods, with the aim of comparing their productivities. Additionally, pollutant load decrease from both processes was evaluated and the colors of biomasses were compared to a commercial product. Cultivation was carried out under anaerobiosis, 30 ± 5ºC and 2,000 ± 500 lux, during 10 days, and the biomass recuperation was performed by process A (centrifugation) and process B (cross-flow microfiltration). Results showed productivity of 0.043 g biomass L-1 day-1 for process A, with a COD decrease of 52.51%. For process B, productivity was 0.079 g biomass L-1 day-1, with 81.25% COD reduction. The biomasses and the commercial product had similar lightness and hue. However, there was a difference in color saturation between the product from microfiltration and the commercial pigment. This work concluded that cross-flow microfiltration was the best method for obtaining Rubrivivax gelatinosus biomass, providing the higher decrease of organic matter in the industrial effluent.
id UNSP_6abc2a781e6c4bbd4dc32e8afcd82c5f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/133025
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Recuperação de biomassa bacteriana produzida no tratamento de efluente industrialRecuperation of bacterial biomass produced in the treatment of industry effluentBiotechnologyCell massChemical oxygen demandColorimetryBiotecnologiaMassa celularDemanda química de oxigênioColorimetriaRecently, there has been an increasing search for alternative ways to treat industrial wastewater. The cultivation of phototrophic microorganisms in those effluents represents an attractive biotechnological alternative because it reduces the pollutant load and provides a useful biomass. However, for the removal of the cell mass provided by the process, it is necessary to use specific technologies. In this work, Rubrivivax gelatinosus was cultivated in wastewaters from fish slaughter and processing and the biomass was recuperated by two distinct methods, with the aim of comparing their productivities. Additionally, pollutant load decrease from both processes was evaluated and the colors of biomasses were compared to a commercial product. Cultivation was carried out under anaerobiosis, 30 ± 5ºC and 2,000 ± 500 lux, during 10 days, and the biomass recuperation was performed by process A (centrifugation) and process B (cross-flow microfiltration). Results showed productivity of 0.043 g biomass L-1 day-1 for process A, with a COD decrease of 52.51%. For process B, productivity was 0.079 g biomass L-1 day-1, with 81.25% COD reduction. The biomasses and the commercial product had similar lightness and hue. However, there was a difference in color saturation between the product from microfiltration and the commercial pigment. This work concluded that cross-flow microfiltration was the best method for obtaining Rubrivivax gelatinosus biomass, providing the higher decrease of organic matter in the industrial effluent.Ultimamente, tem se observado uma crescente busca por formas alternativas para o tratamento de efluentes industriais líquidos. O cultivo de microorganismos fotossintetizantes nestes efluentes representa uma alternativa biotecnológica atrativa, pois possibilita a redução da carga poluente e gera uma massa celular com potencial de aplicação. Entretanto, para a remoção da massa celular gerada nesses processos, é necessário o emprego de tecnologias específicas. Neste trabalho, Rubrivivax gelatinosus foi cultivada no efluente líquido de indústria de abate e processamento de pescado e a biomassa foi recuperada por duas metodologias diferentes, com o objetivo de comparar a produtividade entre elas. Adicionalmente, avaliou-se a remoção da carga poluente e comparou-se a cor das massas celulares obtidas com a de um produto comercial de referência. O cultivo foi realizado sob anaerobiose, 30 ± 5ºC e 2.000 ± 500 lux, durante 10 dias, e a recuperação da biomassa foi realizada pelos processos A (utilizando-se centrifugação) e B (utilizando-se microfiltração tangencial). Pelos resultados, observou-se uma produtividade de 0,043 g biomassa L-1 dia-1 e redução de 52,51% da DQO no processo A. Em B, observou-se, respectivamente, 0,079 g biomassa L-1 dia-1 e 81,25%. As biomassas e o produto comercial apresentaram semelhante luminosidade e tonalidade. Houve diferença na saturação da cor entre o produto obtido da microfiltração e o comercial. Conclui-se que o sistema de microfiltração por membrana foi o melhor método para a obtenção da biomassa de Rubrivivax gelatinosus, promovendo uma alta redução da matéria orgânica no efluente industrial.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura, Palmas, TO, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária de Araçatuba (FMVA), Departamento de Apoio, Produção e Saúde Animal, Rua Clóvis Pestana, 793, Jd. Dona Amélia, CEP 16050680, Araçatuba, SP, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária de Araçatuba (FMVA), Departamento de Apoio, Produção e Saúde Animal, Rua Clóvis Pestana, 793, Jd. Dona Amélia, CEP 16050680, Araçatuba, SP, BrasilFAPESP: 2007/54732-1Embrapa Pesca e AquiculturaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Lima, Leandro Kanamaru Franco dePonsano, Elisa Helena Giglio [UNESP]Pinto, Marcos Franke [UNESP]2016-01-28T16:53:16Z2016-01-28T16:53:16Z2011info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article456-462application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.18539/CAST.V17I4.2081Revista Brasileira de Agrociência, v. 17, n. 4, p. 456-462, 2011.0104-8996http://hdl.handle.net/11449/13302510.18539/CAST.V17I4.2081ISSN0104-8996-2011-17-04-456-462.pdf40222272187349109501017500294164Currículo Lattesreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporRevista Brasileira de Agrociênciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-04T19:15:52Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/133025Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-04T19:15:52Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Recuperação de biomassa bacteriana produzida no tratamento de efluente industrial
Recuperation of bacterial biomass produced in the treatment of industry effluent
title Recuperação de biomassa bacteriana produzida no tratamento de efluente industrial
spellingShingle Recuperação de biomassa bacteriana produzida no tratamento de efluente industrial
Lima, Leandro Kanamaru Franco de
Biotechnology
Cell mass
Chemical oxygen demand
Colorimetry
Biotecnologia
Massa celular
Demanda química de oxigênio
Colorimetria
title_short Recuperação de biomassa bacteriana produzida no tratamento de efluente industrial
title_full Recuperação de biomassa bacteriana produzida no tratamento de efluente industrial
title_fullStr Recuperação de biomassa bacteriana produzida no tratamento de efluente industrial
title_full_unstemmed Recuperação de biomassa bacteriana produzida no tratamento de efluente industrial
title_sort Recuperação de biomassa bacteriana produzida no tratamento de efluente industrial
author Lima, Leandro Kanamaru Franco de
author_facet Lima, Leandro Kanamaru Franco de
Ponsano, Elisa Helena Giglio [UNESP]
Pinto, Marcos Franke [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Ponsano, Elisa Helena Giglio [UNESP]
Pinto, Marcos Franke [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Leandro Kanamaru Franco de
Ponsano, Elisa Helena Giglio [UNESP]
Pinto, Marcos Franke [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biotechnology
Cell mass
Chemical oxygen demand
Colorimetry
Biotecnologia
Massa celular
Demanda química de oxigênio
Colorimetria
topic Biotechnology
Cell mass
Chemical oxygen demand
Colorimetry
Biotecnologia
Massa celular
Demanda química de oxigênio
Colorimetria
description Recently, there has been an increasing search for alternative ways to treat industrial wastewater. The cultivation of phototrophic microorganisms in those effluents represents an attractive biotechnological alternative because it reduces the pollutant load and provides a useful biomass. However, for the removal of the cell mass provided by the process, it is necessary to use specific technologies. In this work, Rubrivivax gelatinosus was cultivated in wastewaters from fish slaughter and processing and the biomass was recuperated by two distinct methods, with the aim of comparing their productivities. Additionally, pollutant load decrease from both processes was evaluated and the colors of biomasses were compared to a commercial product. Cultivation was carried out under anaerobiosis, 30 ± 5ºC and 2,000 ± 500 lux, during 10 days, and the biomass recuperation was performed by process A (centrifugation) and process B (cross-flow microfiltration). Results showed productivity of 0.043 g biomass L-1 day-1 for process A, with a COD decrease of 52.51%. For process B, productivity was 0.079 g biomass L-1 day-1, with 81.25% COD reduction. The biomasses and the commercial product had similar lightness and hue. However, there was a difference in color saturation between the product from microfiltration and the commercial pigment. This work concluded that cross-flow microfiltration was the best method for obtaining Rubrivivax gelatinosus biomass, providing the higher decrease of organic matter in the industrial effluent.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011
2016-01-28T16:53:16Z
2016-01-28T16:53:16Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.18539/CAST.V17I4.2081
Revista Brasileira de Agrociência, v. 17, n. 4, p. 456-462, 2011.
0104-8996
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/133025
10.18539/CAST.V17I4.2081
ISSN0104-8996-2011-17-04-456-462.pdf
4022227218734910
9501017500294164
url http://dx.doi.org/10.18539/CAST.V17I4.2081
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/133025
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Agrociência, v. 17, n. 4, p. 456-462, 2011.
0104-8996
10.18539/CAST.V17I4.2081
ISSN0104-8996-2011-17-04-456-462.pdf
4022227218734910
9501017500294164
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Agrociência
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 456-462
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Currículo Lattes
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1810021404859432960