Recombinant protein KR95 as an alternative for serological diagnosis of human visceral leishmaniasis in the Americas

• Autor(a) principal: Fujimori, Mahyumi
• Data de Publicação: 2023
• Outros Autores: Valencia-Portillo, Ruth Tamara, Lauletta Lindoso, José Angelo, Celeste, Beatriz Julieta, de Almeida, Roque Pacheco, Nery Costa, Carlos Henrique, da Cruz, Alda Maria, Druzian, Angelita Fernandes, Duthie, Malcolm Scott, Branco Fortaleza, Carlos Magno Castelo [UNESP], de Oliveira, Ana Lúcia Lyrio, Miranda Paniago, Anamaria Mello, Queiroz, Igor Thiago, Reed, Steve, Vallur, Aarthy C., Goto, Hiro, Arroyo Sanchez, Maria Carmen
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282483; http://hdl.handle.net/11449/248458

In the Americas, visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is caused by the protozoan Leishmania infantum, leading to death if not promptly diagnosed and treated. In Brazil, the disease reaches all regions, and in 2020, 1,933 VL cases were reported with 9.5% lethality. Thus, an accurate diagnosis is essential to provide the appropriate treatment. Serological VL diagnosis is based mainly on immunochromatographic tests, but their performance may vary by location, and evaluation of diagnostic alternatives is necessary. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the performance of ELISA with the scantily studied recombinant antigens, K18 and KR95, comparing their performance with the already known rK28 and rK39. Sera from parasitologically confirmed symptomatic VL patients (n = 90) and healthy endemic controls (n = 90) were submitted to ELISA with rK18 and rKR95. Sensitivity (95% CI) was, respectively, 83.3% (74.2–89.7) and 95.6% (88.8–98.6), and specificity (95% CI) was 93.3% (85.9–97.2) and 97.8% (91.8–99.9). For validation of ELISA with the recombinant antigens, we included samples from 122 VL patients and 83 healthy controls collected in three regions in Brazil (Northeast, Southeast, and Midwest). When comparing the results obtained with the VL patients’ samples, significantly lower sensitivity was obtained by rK18-ELISA (88.5%, 95% CI: 81.5–93.2) compared with rK28-ELISA (95.9%, 95% CI: 90.5–98.5), but the sensitivity was similar comparing rKR95-ELISA (95.1%, 95% CI: 89.5–98.0), rK28-ELISA (95.9%, 95% CI: 90.5–98.5), and rK39-ELISA (94.3%, 95% CI: 88.4–97.4). Analyzing the specificity, it was lowest with rK18-ELISA (62.7%, 95% CI: 51.9–72.3) with 83 healthy control samples. Conversely, higher and similar specificity was obtained by rKR95-ELISA (96.4%, 95% CI: 89.5–99.2), rK28-ELISA (95.2%, 95% CI: 87.9–98.5), and rK39-ELISA (95.2%, 95% CI: 87.9–98.5). There was no difference in sensitivity and specificity across localities. Cross-reactivity assessment, performed with sera of patients diagnosed with inflammatory disorders and other infectious diseases, was 34.2% with rK18-ELISA and 3.1% with rKR95-ELISA. Based on these data, we suggest using recombinant antigen KR95 in serological assays for VL diagnosis.