Canopy Interception for a Tallgrass Prairie under Juniper Encroachment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zou, Chris B.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Caterina, Giulia L. [UNESP], Will, Rodney E., Stebler, Elaine, Turton, Donald
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141422
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158573
Resumo: Rainfall partitioning and redistribution by canopies are important ecohydrological processes underlying ecosystem dynamics. We quantified and contrasted spatial and temporal variations of rainfall redistribution for a juniper (Juniperus virginiana, redcedar) woodland and a tallgrass prairie in the south-central Great Plains, USA. Our results showed that redcedar trees had high canopy storage capacity (S) ranging from 2.14 mm for open stands to 3.44 mm for closed stands. The canopy funneling ratios (F) of redcedar trees varied substantially among stand type and tree size. The open stands and smaller trees usually had higher F values and were more efficient in partitioning rainfall into stemflow. Larger trees were more effective in partitioning rainfall into throughfall and no significant changes in the total interception ratios among canopy types and tree size were found. The S values were highly variable for tallgrass prairie, ranging from 0.27 mm at early growing season to 3.86 mm at senescence. As a result, the rainfall interception by tallgrass prairie was characterized by high temporal instability. On an annual basis, our results showed no significant difference in total rainfall loss to canopy interception between redcedar trees and tallgrass prairie. Increasing structural complexity associated with redcedar encroachment into tallgrass prairie changes the rainfall redistribution and partitioning pattern at both the temporal and spatial scales, but does not change the overall canopy interception ratios compared with unburned and ungrazed tallgrass prairie. Our findings support the idea of convergence in interception ratio for different canopy structures under the same precipitation regime. The temporal change in rainfall interception loss from redcedar encroachment is important to understand how juniper encroachment will interact with changing rainfall regime and potentially alter regional streamflow under climate change.
id UNSP_718337355d10e5945f0ce704caec410e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/158573
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Canopy Interception for a Tallgrass Prairie under Juniper EncroachmentRainfall partitioning and redistribution by canopies are important ecohydrological processes underlying ecosystem dynamics. We quantified and contrasted spatial and temporal variations of rainfall redistribution for a juniper (Juniperus virginiana, redcedar) woodland and a tallgrass prairie in the south-central Great Plains, USA. Our results showed that redcedar trees had high canopy storage capacity (S) ranging from 2.14 mm for open stands to 3.44 mm for closed stands. The canopy funneling ratios (F) of redcedar trees varied substantially among stand type and tree size. The open stands and smaller trees usually had higher F values and were more efficient in partitioning rainfall into stemflow. Larger trees were more effective in partitioning rainfall into throughfall and no significant changes in the total interception ratios among canopy types and tree size were found. The S values were highly variable for tallgrass prairie, ranging from 0.27 mm at early growing season to 3.86 mm at senescence. As a result, the rainfall interception by tallgrass prairie was characterized by high temporal instability. On an annual basis, our results showed no significant difference in total rainfall loss to canopy interception between redcedar trees and tallgrass prairie. Increasing structural complexity associated with redcedar encroachment into tallgrass prairie changes the rainfall redistribution and partitioning pattern at both the temporal and spatial scales, but does not change the overall canopy interception ratios compared with unburned and ungrazed tallgrass prairie. Our findings support the idea of convergence in interception ratio for different canopy structures under the same precipitation regime. The temporal change in rainfall interception loss from redcedar encroachment is important to understand how juniper encroachment will interact with changing rainfall regime and potentially alter regional streamflow under climate change.U. S. Geological Survey/National Institutes for Water ResearchUSGS OWRRI grantsNational Science Foundation/Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR)NSF Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems (CNH) programUnited States Department of Agriculture/National Institute of Food and AgricultureOklahoma State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Ecol & Management, Stillwater, OK 74078 USAUniv Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, BrazilU. S. Geological Survey/National Institutes for Water Research: USGS104G (G09AP00146)National Science Foundation/Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR): NSF-1301789NSF Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems (CNH) program: DEB-1413900United States Department of Agriculture/National Institute of Food and Agriculture: 2014-67010-21653Public Library ScienceOklahoma State UnivUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Zou, Chris B.Caterina, Giulia L. [UNESP]Will, Rodney E.Stebler, ElaineTurton, Donald2018-11-26T15:28:10Z2018-11-26T15:28:10Z2015-11-06info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article19application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141422Plos One. San Francisco: Public Library Science, v. 10, n. 11, 19 p., 2015.1932-6203http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15857310.1371/journal.pone.0141422WOS:000364398700022WOS000364398700022.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPlos One1,164info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-23T06:08:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/158573Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:45:23.830560Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Canopy Interception for a Tallgrass Prairie under Juniper Encroachment
title Canopy Interception for a Tallgrass Prairie under Juniper Encroachment
spellingShingle Canopy Interception for a Tallgrass Prairie under Juniper Encroachment
Zou, Chris B.
title_short Canopy Interception for a Tallgrass Prairie under Juniper Encroachment
title_full Canopy Interception for a Tallgrass Prairie under Juniper Encroachment
title_fullStr Canopy Interception for a Tallgrass Prairie under Juniper Encroachment
title_full_unstemmed Canopy Interception for a Tallgrass Prairie under Juniper Encroachment
title_sort Canopy Interception for a Tallgrass Prairie under Juniper Encroachment
author Zou, Chris B.
author_facet Zou, Chris B.
Caterina, Giulia L. [UNESP]
Will, Rodney E.
Stebler, Elaine
Turton, Donald
author_role author
author2 Caterina, Giulia L. [UNESP]
Will, Rodney E.
Stebler, Elaine
Turton, Donald
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Oklahoma State Univ
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zou, Chris B.
Caterina, Giulia L. [UNESP]
Will, Rodney E.
Stebler, Elaine
Turton, Donald
description Rainfall partitioning and redistribution by canopies are important ecohydrological processes underlying ecosystem dynamics. We quantified and contrasted spatial and temporal variations of rainfall redistribution for a juniper (Juniperus virginiana, redcedar) woodland and a tallgrass prairie in the south-central Great Plains, USA. Our results showed that redcedar trees had high canopy storage capacity (S) ranging from 2.14 mm for open stands to 3.44 mm for closed stands. The canopy funneling ratios (F) of redcedar trees varied substantially among stand type and tree size. The open stands and smaller trees usually had higher F values and were more efficient in partitioning rainfall into stemflow. Larger trees were more effective in partitioning rainfall into throughfall and no significant changes in the total interception ratios among canopy types and tree size were found. The S values were highly variable for tallgrass prairie, ranging from 0.27 mm at early growing season to 3.86 mm at senescence. As a result, the rainfall interception by tallgrass prairie was characterized by high temporal instability. On an annual basis, our results showed no significant difference in total rainfall loss to canopy interception between redcedar trees and tallgrass prairie. Increasing structural complexity associated with redcedar encroachment into tallgrass prairie changes the rainfall redistribution and partitioning pattern at both the temporal and spatial scales, but does not change the overall canopy interception ratios compared with unburned and ungrazed tallgrass prairie. Our findings support the idea of convergence in interception ratio for different canopy structures under the same precipitation regime. The temporal change in rainfall interception loss from redcedar encroachment is important to understand how juniper encroachment will interact with changing rainfall regime and potentially alter regional streamflow under climate change.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-11-06
2018-11-26T15:28:10Z
2018-11-26T15:28:10Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141422
Plos One. San Francisco: Public Library Science, v. 10, n. 11, 19 p., 2015.
1932-6203
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158573
10.1371/journal.pone.0141422
WOS:000364398700022
WOS000364398700022.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141422
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158573
identifier_str_mv Plos One. San Francisco: Public Library Science, v. 10, n. 11, 19 p., 2015.
1932-6203
10.1371/journal.pone.0141422
WOS:000364398700022
WOS000364398700022.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Plos One
1,164
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 19
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128556317802496