Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo de conferência |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.506 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174108 |
Resumo: | In recent years, piezoelectric sensors have been used in many non-destructive methods for detection of structural damage in structural health monitoring (SHM) systems, including the electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique. The classic method to install the sensor in the structure to be monitored is using a high stiffness adhesive. However, many studies have proposed alternative methods of sensor installation. Thus, the purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative experimental analysis of the main installation methods of the sensors in the electromechanical impedance technique, which are the direct installation, the magnetic coupling, and using aluminum foils. Tests with the three installation methods were carried out on aluminum structures and the results were compared using the electrical impedance signatures and damage indices. The experimental results indicate important features of each method relative to the feasibility for detection of structural damage. |
id |
UNSP_d71011a27bca295068f4834013a74b45 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/174108 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applicationscouplingimpedanceinstallationpiezoelectric transducersSHMIn recent years, piezoelectric sensors have been used in many non-destructive methods for detection of structural damage in structural health monitoring (SHM) systems, including the electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique. The classic method to install the sensor in the structure to be monitored is using a high stiffness adhesive. However, many studies have proposed alternative methods of sensor installation. Thus, the purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative experimental analysis of the main installation methods of the sensors in the electromechanical impedance technique, which are the direct installation, the magnetic coupling, and using aluminum foils. Tests with the three installation methods were carried out on aluminum structures and the results were compared using the electrical impedance signatures and damage indices. The experimental results indicate important features of each method relative to the feasibility for detection of structural damage.Faculdade de Engenharia UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista Bauru Departamento de Engenharia ElétricaFaculdade de Engenharia UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista Bauru Departamento de Engenharia ElétricaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Da Silveira, Ricardo Z.M. [UNESP]Campeiro, Leandro M. [UNESP]Baptista, Fabricio G. [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:09:22Z2018-12-11T17:09:22Z2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject1751-1754http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.506Procedia Engineering, v. 168, p. 1751-1754.1877-7058http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17410810.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.5062-s2.0-85009973173Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengProcedia Engineering0,282info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T21:44:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/174108Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T21:44:24Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications |
title |
Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications Da Silveira, Ricardo Z.M. [UNESP] coupling impedance installation piezoelectric transducers SHM |
title_short |
Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications |
title_full |
Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications |
title_sort |
Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications |
author |
Da Silveira, Ricardo Z.M. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Da Silveira, Ricardo Z.M. [UNESP] Campeiro, Leandro M. [UNESP] Baptista, Fabricio G. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Campeiro, Leandro M. [UNESP] Baptista, Fabricio G. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Da Silveira, Ricardo Z.M. [UNESP] Campeiro, Leandro M. [UNESP] Baptista, Fabricio G. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
coupling impedance installation piezoelectric transducers SHM |
topic |
coupling impedance installation piezoelectric transducers SHM |
description |
In recent years, piezoelectric sensors have been used in many non-destructive methods for detection of structural damage in structural health monitoring (SHM) systems, including the electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique. The classic method to install the sensor in the structure to be monitored is using a high stiffness adhesive. However, many studies have proposed alternative methods of sensor installation. Thus, the purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative experimental analysis of the main installation methods of the sensors in the electromechanical impedance technique, which are the direct installation, the magnetic coupling, and using aluminum foils. Tests with the three installation methods were carried out on aluminum structures and the results were compared using the electrical impedance signatures and damage indices. The experimental results indicate important features of each method relative to the feasibility for detection of structural damage. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-01 2018-12-11T17:09:22Z 2018-12-11T17:09:22Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.506 Procedia Engineering, v. 168, p. 1751-1754. 1877-7058 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174108 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.506 2-s2.0-85009973173 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.506 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174108 |
identifier_str_mv |
Procedia Engineering, v. 168, p. 1751-1754. 1877-7058 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.506 2-s2.0-85009973173 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Procedia Engineering 0,282 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1751-1754 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799965633693089792 |