Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v14n3a15 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172598 |
Resumo: | Aim: To assess the surface topography and chemical composition of three brands of as-received mini-implants (SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao®). Methods: Twelve mini-implants of each brand were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX). Results: There was no significant differences among SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao® mini-implants comparing their surface topography by visualization of SEM micrographs and analysis of scores. The EDX analysis showed statistically significant difference among them for the amount of Ti, Al and V. Miniimplants SIN® presented also N and O in their composition. Conclusions: In conclusion, the miniimplants Morelli®, SIN® and Conexao® presented Ti as main component of the alloy. Remaining components, such as Al and V, were also observed in all the analyzed brands, with differences among them. Only SIN® mini-implants presented N and O. As far as surface topography is concerned, there are no differences among the three brands of mini-implants. |
id |
UNSP_776f35f770bdc8254146ba948c94317a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172598 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implantsOrthodontic anchorage proceduresOrthodonticsTitaniumAim: To assess the surface topography and chemical composition of three brands of as-received mini-implants (SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao®). Methods: Twelve mini-implants of each brand were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX). Results: There was no significant differences among SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao® mini-implants comparing their surface topography by visualization of SEM micrographs and analysis of scores. The EDX analysis showed statistically significant difference among them for the amount of Ti, Al and V. Miniimplants SIN® presented also N and O in their composition. Conclusions: In conclusion, the miniimplants Morelli®, SIN® and Conexao® presented Ti as main component of the alloy. Remaining components, such as Al and V, were also observed in all the analyzed brands, with differences among them. Only SIN® mini-implants presented N and O. As far as surface topography is concerned, there are no differences among the three brands of mini-implants.Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Clinic Araraquara Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESPHospital of Rehabilitation of Oralfacial Anomalies Universidade de São Paulo - USP Area of ProsthodonticsDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Clinic Araraquara Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques [UNESP]Soares, Ana PratesShintcovsk, Ricardo Lima [UNESP]Martins, Lidia Parsekian [UNESP]Gandini, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:01:17Z2018-12-11T17:01:17Z2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article251-255application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v14n3a15Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 14, n. 3, p. 251-255, 2015.1677-32251677-3217http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17259810.1590/1677-3225v14n3a15S1677-322520150003002512-s2.0-84959291482S1677-32252015000300251.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences0,131info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-26T14:21:35Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172598Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-26T14:21:35Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants |
title |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants |
spellingShingle |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques [UNESP] Orthodontic anchorage procedures Orthodontics Titanium |
title_short |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants |
title_full |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants |
title_fullStr |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants |
title_full_unstemmed |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants |
title_sort |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants |
author |
Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques [UNESP] Soares, Ana Prates Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima [UNESP] Martins, Lidia Parsekian [UNESP] Gandini, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Soares, Ana Prates Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima [UNESP] Martins, Lidia Parsekian [UNESP] Gandini, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques [UNESP] Soares, Ana Prates Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima [UNESP] Martins, Lidia Parsekian [UNESP] Gandini, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Orthodontic anchorage procedures Orthodontics Titanium |
topic |
Orthodontic anchorage procedures Orthodontics Titanium |
description |
Aim: To assess the surface topography and chemical composition of three brands of as-received mini-implants (SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao®). Methods: Twelve mini-implants of each brand were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX). Results: There was no significant differences among SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao® mini-implants comparing their surface topography by visualization of SEM micrographs and analysis of scores. The EDX analysis showed statistically significant difference among them for the amount of Ti, Al and V. Miniimplants SIN® presented also N and O in their composition. Conclusions: In conclusion, the miniimplants Morelli®, SIN® and Conexao® presented Ti as main component of the alloy. Remaining components, such as Al and V, were also observed in all the analyzed brands, with differences among them. Only SIN® mini-implants presented N and O. As far as surface topography is concerned, there are no differences among the three brands of mini-implants. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-01 2018-12-11T17:01:17Z 2018-12-11T17:01:17Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v14n3a15 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 14, n. 3, p. 251-255, 2015. 1677-3225 1677-3217 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172598 10.1590/1677-3225v14n3a15 S1677-32252015000300251 2-s2.0-84959291482 S1677-32252015000300251.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v14n3a15 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172598 |
identifier_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 14, n. 3, p. 251-255, 2015. 1677-3225 1677-3217 10.1590/1677-3225v14n3a15 S1677-32252015000300251 2-s2.0-84959291482 S1677-32252015000300251.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences 0,131 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
251-255 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546436782981120 |