Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642881 |
Resumo: | Aim: To assess the surface topography and chemical composition of three brands of as-received mini-implants (SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao®). Methods: Twelve mini-implants of each brand were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX). Results: There was no significant differences among SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao® mini-implants comparing their surface topography by visualization of SEM micrographs and analysis of scores. The EDX analysis showed statistically significant difference among them for the amount of Ti, Al and V. Miniimplants SIN® presented also N and O in their composition. Conclusions: In conclusion, the miniimplants Morelli®, SIN® and Conexao® presented Ti as main component of the alloy. Remaining components, such as Al and V, were also observed in all the analyzed brands, with differences among them. Only SIN® mini-implants presented N and O. As far as surface topography is concerned, there are no differences among the three brands of mini-implants |
id |
UNICAMP-8_d46508b1587912dc2b624dd6e45273a1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8642881 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implantsOrthodontics. Orthodontic anchorage procedures. TitaniumOdontologiaAim: To assess the surface topography and chemical composition of three brands of as-received mini-implants (SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao®). Methods: Twelve mini-implants of each brand were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX). Results: There was no significant differences among SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao® mini-implants comparing their surface topography by visualization of SEM micrographs and analysis of scores. The EDX analysis showed statistically significant difference among them for the amount of Ti, Al and V. Miniimplants SIN® presented also N and O in their composition. Conclusions: In conclusion, the miniimplants Morelli®, SIN® and Conexao® presented Ti as main component of the alloy. Remaining components, such as Al and V, were also observed in all the analyzed brands, with differences among them. Only SIN® mini-implants presented N and O. As far as surface topography is concerned, there are no differences among the three brands of mini-implantsUniversidade Estadual de Campinas2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642881Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 14 n. 3 (2015): Jul./Sep.; 251-255Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 14 No. 3 (2015): Jul./Sep.; 251-2551677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642881/10450Copyright (c) 2015 Luegya Amorim Henriques Knop, Ana Prates Soares, Ricardo Lima Shintcovsk, Lidia Parsekian Martins, Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Júniorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKnop, Luegya Amorim HenriquesSoares, Ana PratesShintcovsk, Ricardo LimaMartins, Lidia ParsekianGandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga2023-10-02T15:20:34Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8642881Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2023-10-02T15:20:34Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants |
title |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants |
spellingShingle |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques Orthodontics. Orthodontic anchorage procedures. Titanium Odontologia |
title_short |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants |
title_full |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants |
title_fullStr |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants |
title_full_unstemmed |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants |
title_sort |
Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants |
author |
Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques |
author_facet |
Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques Soares, Ana Prates Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima Martins, Lidia Parsekian Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Soares, Ana Prates Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima Martins, Lidia Parsekian Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques Soares, Ana Prates Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima Martins, Lidia Parsekian Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Orthodontics. Orthodontic anchorage procedures. Titanium Odontologia |
topic |
Orthodontics. Orthodontic anchorage procedures. Titanium Odontologia |
description |
Aim: To assess the surface topography and chemical composition of three brands of as-received mini-implants (SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao®). Methods: Twelve mini-implants of each brand were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX). Results: There was no significant differences among SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao® mini-implants comparing their surface topography by visualization of SEM micrographs and analysis of scores. The EDX analysis showed statistically significant difference among them for the amount of Ti, Al and V. Miniimplants SIN® presented also N and O in their composition. Conclusions: In conclusion, the miniimplants Morelli®, SIN® and Conexao® presented Ti as main component of the alloy. Remaining components, such as Al and V, were also observed in all the analyzed brands, with differences among them. Only SIN® mini-implants presented N and O. As far as surface topography is concerned, there are no differences among the three brands of mini-implants |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642881 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642881 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642881/10450 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 14 n. 3 (2015): Jul./Sep.; 251-255 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 14 No. 3 (2015): Jul./Sep.; 251-255 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216401115348992 |