Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2148-5 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174837 |
Resumo: | Objectives: The morphology and chemical composition of enamel submitted to different sterilization methods was studied. Methods: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were performed to evaluate 50 bovine enamel specimens sterilized using four methods: microwaving (MI), gamma irradiation (GI), ethylene oxide (EO), and steam autoclave (SA). Non-sterilized specimens were used as control. Results: XPS indicated that the concentration of P (phosphorus), CO3 (carbonate), and CO3/P was not changed in all groups. GI produced no significant change on elemental composition. SA produced the major decrease in calcium (Ca), Ca/P ratio, and increase in N (nitrogen). MI was found to decrease Ca, Ca/P ratio and O (oxygen), and increase in C (carbon) and N. EO produced decrease in Ca and O with increased C concentration. FEG-SEM revealed surface and in-depth morphological changes on SA specimens. Minor surface alterations were observed for EO and for MI groups, and no alteration was observed on GI group. EDS indicated no difference on elemental composition of enamel bulk among groups. Conclusions: SA produced mineral loss and morphological alterations on surface and in depth. MI and EO sterilization caused mineral loss showing only slight alteration on enamel surface. GI sterilization preserves the morphological characteristics of enamel. The sterilization methods could be classified from lower to high damage as GI < MI < EO < SA. Clinical relevance: This is a comprehensive comparative study where different methods for enamel sterilization were investigated in terms of chemical changes. The results presented here may help researchers to choose the most appropriate method for their research setting and purpose. |
id |
UNSP_77d5c3b836d3f5a0ace5e0f970498f6d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/174837 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methodsChemical analysisDental enamelEDSSEMSterilizationXPSObjectives: The morphology and chemical composition of enamel submitted to different sterilization methods was studied. Methods: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were performed to evaluate 50 bovine enamel specimens sterilized using four methods: microwaving (MI), gamma irradiation (GI), ethylene oxide (EO), and steam autoclave (SA). Non-sterilized specimens were used as control. Results: XPS indicated that the concentration of P (phosphorus), CO3 (carbonate), and CO3/P was not changed in all groups. GI produced no significant change on elemental composition. SA produced the major decrease in calcium (Ca), Ca/P ratio, and increase in N (nitrogen). MI was found to decrease Ca, Ca/P ratio and O (oxygen), and increase in C (carbon) and N. EO produced decrease in Ca and O with increased C concentration. FEG-SEM revealed surface and in-depth morphological changes on SA specimens. Minor surface alterations were observed for EO and for MI groups, and no alteration was observed on GI group. EDS indicated no difference on elemental composition of enamel bulk among groups. Conclusions: SA produced mineral loss and morphological alterations on surface and in depth. MI and EO sterilization caused mineral loss showing only slight alteration on enamel surface. GI sterilization preserves the morphological characteristics of enamel. The sterilization methods could be classified from lower to high damage as GI < MI < EO < SA. Clinical relevance: This is a comprehensive comparative study where different methods for enamel sterilization were investigated in terms of chemical changes. The results presented here may help researchers to choose the most appropriate method for their research setting and purpose.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Rua Humaitá, N° 1680Faculdade de Odontologia Universidade Santo Amaro UNISADepartment of Physical Chemistry Institute of Chemistry UNESP Univ Estadual PaulistaDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Rua Humaitá, N° 1680Department of Physical Chemistry Institute of Chemistry UNESP Univ Estadual PaulistaFAPESP: 2011/09416-0FAPESP: 2011/10358-4Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)UNISAViana, P. S. [UNESP]Orlandi, M. O. [UNESP]Pavarina, A. C. [UNESP]Machado, A. L. [UNESP]Vergani, C. E. [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:13:06Z2018-12-11T17:13:06Z2018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article733-744http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2148-5Clinical Oral Investigations, v. 22, n. 2, p. 733-744, 2018.1436-37711432-6981http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17483710.1007/s00784-017-2148-52-s2.0-85021750558Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengClinical Oral Investigations0,9860,986info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T14:56:41Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/174837Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T14:56:41Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods |
title |
Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods |
spellingShingle |
Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods Viana, P. S. [UNESP] Chemical analysis Dental enamel EDS SEM Sterilization XPS |
title_short |
Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods |
title_full |
Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods |
title_fullStr |
Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods |
title_sort |
Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods |
author |
Viana, P. S. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Viana, P. S. [UNESP] Orlandi, M. O. [UNESP] Pavarina, A. C. [UNESP] Machado, A. L. [UNESP] Vergani, C. E. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Orlandi, M. O. [UNESP] Pavarina, A. C. [UNESP] Machado, A. L. [UNESP] Vergani, C. E. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) UNISA |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Viana, P. S. [UNESP] Orlandi, M. O. [UNESP] Pavarina, A. C. [UNESP] Machado, A. L. [UNESP] Vergani, C. E. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Chemical analysis Dental enamel EDS SEM Sterilization XPS |
topic |
Chemical analysis Dental enamel EDS SEM Sterilization XPS |
description |
Objectives: The morphology and chemical composition of enamel submitted to different sterilization methods was studied. Methods: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were performed to evaluate 50 bovine enamel specimens sterilized using four methods: microwaving (MI), gamma irradiation (GI), ethylene oxide (EO), and steam autoclave (SA). Non-sterilized specimens were used as control. Results: XPS indicated that the concentration of P (phosphorus), CO3 (carbonate), and CO3/P was not changed in all groups. GI produced no significant change on elemental composition. SA produced the major decrease in calcium (Ca), Ca/P ratio, and increase in N (nitrogen). MI was found to decrease Ca, Ca/P ratio and O (oxygen), and increase in C (carbon) and N. EO produced decrease in Ca and O with increased C concentration. FEG-SEM revealed surface and in-depth morphological changes on SA specimens. Minor surface alterations were observed for EO and for MI groups, and no alteration was observed on GI group. EDS indicated no difference on elemental composition of enamel bulk among groups. Conclusions: SA produced mineral loss and morphological alterations on surface and in depth. MI and EO sterilization caused mineral loss showing only slight alteration on enamel surface. GI sterilization preserves the morphological characteristics of enamel. The sterilization methods could be classified from lower to high damage as GI < MI < EO < SA. Clinical relevance: This is a comprehensive comparative study where different methods for enamel sterilization were investigated in terms of chemical changes. The results presented here may help researchers to choose the most appropriate method for their research setting and purpose. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-11T17:13:06Z 2018-12-11T17:13:06Z 2018-03-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2148-5 Clinical Oral Investigations, v. 22, n. 2, p. 733-744, 2018. 1436-3771 1432-6981 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174837 10.1007/s00784-017-2148-5 2-s2.0-85021750558 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2148-5 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174837 |
identifier_str_mv |
Clinical Oral Investigations, v. 22, n. 2, p. 733-744, 2018. 1436-3771 1432-6981 10.1007/s00784-017-2148-5 2-s2.0-85021750558 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical Oral Investigations 0,986 0,986 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
733-744 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546414703116288 |