Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Viana, P. S. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Orlandi, M. O. [UNESP], Pavarina, A. C. [UNESP], Machado, A. L. [UNESP], Vergani, C. E. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2148-5
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174837
Resumo: Objectives: The morphology and chemical composition of enamel submitted to different sterilization methods was studied. Methods: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were performed to evaluate 50 bovine enamel specimens sterilized using four methods: microwaving (MI), gamma irradiation (GI), ethylene oxide (EO), and steam autoclave (SA). Non-sterilized specimens were used as control. Results: XPS indicated that the concentration of P (phosphorus), CO3 (carbonate), and CO3/P was not changed in all groups. GI produced no significant change on elemental composition. SA produced the major decrease in calcium (Ca), Ca/P ratio, and increase in N (nitrogen). MI was found to decrease Ca, Ca/P ratio and O (oxygen), and increase in C (carbon) and N. EO produced decrease in Ca and O with increased C concentration. FEG-SEM revealed surface and in-depth morphological changes on SA specimens. Minor surface alterations were observed for EO and for MI groups, and no alteration was observed on GI group. EDS indicated no difference on elemental composition of enamel bulk among groups. Conclusions: SA produced mineral loss and morphological alterations on surface and in depth. MI and EO sterilization caused mineral loss showing only slight alteration on enamel surface. GI sterilization preserves the morphological characteristics of enamel. The sterilization methods could be classified from lower to high damage as GI < MI < EO < SA. Clinical relevance: This is a comprehensive comparative study where different methods for enamel sterilization were investigated in terms of chemical changes. The results presented here may help researchers to choose the most appropriate method for their research setting and purpose.
id UNSP_77d5c3b836d3f5a0ace5e0f970498f6d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/174837
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methodsChemical analysisDental enamelEDSSEMSterilizationXPSObjectives: The morphology and chemical composition of enamel submitted to different sterilization methods was studied. Methods: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were performed to evaluate 50 bovine enamel specimens sterilized using four methods: microwaving (MI), gamma irradiation (GI), ethylene oxide (EO), and steam autoclave (SA). Non-sterilized specimens were used as control. Results: XPS indicated that the concentration of P (phosphorus), CO3 (carbonate), and CO3/P was not changed in all groups. GI produced no significant change on elemental composition. SA produced the major decrease in calcium (Ca), Ca/P ratio, and increase in N (nitrogen). MI was found to decrease Ca, Ca/P ratio and O (oxygen), and increase in C (carbon) and N. EO produced decrease in Ca and O with increased C concentration. FEG-SEM revealed surface and in-depth morphological changes on SA specimens. Minor surface alterations were observed for EO and for MI groups, and no alteration was observed on GI group. EDS indicated no difference on elemental composition of enamel bulk among groups. Conclusions: SA produced mineral loss and morphological alterations on surface and in depth. MI and EO sterilization caused mineral loss showing only slight alteration on enamel surface. GI sterilization preserves the morphological characteristics of enamel. The sterilization methods could be classified from lower to high damage as GI < MI < EO < SA. Clinical relevance: This is a comprehensive comparative study where different methods for enamel sterilization were investigated in terms of chemical changes. The results presented here may help researchers to choose the most appropriate method for their research setting and purpose.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Rua Humaitá, N° 1680Faculdade de Odontologia Universidade Santo Amaro UNISADepartment of Physical Chemistry Institute of Chemistry UNESP Univ Estadual PaulistaDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Rua Humaitá, N° 1680Department of Physical Chemistry Institute of Chemistry UNESP Univ Estadual PaulistaFAPESP: 2011/09416-0FAPESP: 2011/10358-4Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)UNISAViana, P. S. [UNESP]Orlandi, M. O. [UNESP]Pavarina, A. C. [UNESP]Machado, A. L. [UNESP]Vergani, C. E. [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:13:06Z2018-12-11T17:13:06Z2018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article733-744http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2148-5Clinical Oral Investigations, v. 22, n. 2, p. 733-744, 2018.1436-37711432-6981http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17483710.1007/s00784-017-2148-52-s2.0-85021750558Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengClinical Oral Investigations0,9860,986info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T14:56:41Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/174837Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T14:56:41Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods
title Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods
spellingShingle Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods
Viana, P. S. [UNESP]
Chemical analysis
Dental enamel
EDS
SEM
Sterilization
XPS
title_short Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods
title_full Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods
title_fullStr Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods
title_full_unstemmed Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods
title_sort Chemical composition and morphology study of bovine enamel submitted to different sterilization methods
author Viana, P. S. [UNESP]
author_facet Viana, P. S. [UNESP]
Orlandi, M. O. [UNESP]
Pavarina, A. C. [UNESP]
Machado, A. L. [UNESP]
Vergani, C. E. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Orlandi, M. O. [UNESP]
Pavarina, A. C. [UNESP]
Machado, A. L. [UNESP]
Vergani, C. E. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
UNISA
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Viana, P. S. [UNESP]
Orlandi, M. O. [UNESP]
Pavarina, A. C. [UNESP]
Machado, A. L. [UNESP]
Vergani, C. E. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chemical analysis
Dental enamel
EDS
SEM
Sterilization
XPS
topic Chemical analysis
Dental enamel
EDS
SEM
Sterilization
XPS
description Objectives: The morphology and chemical composition of enamel submitted to different sterilization methods was studied. Methods: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were performed to evaluate 50 bovine enamel specimens sterilized using four methods: microwaving (MI), gamma irradiation (GI), ethylene oxide (EO), and steam autoclave (SA). Non-sterilized specimens were used as control. Results: XPS indicated that the concentration of P (phosphorus), CO3 (carbonate), and CO3/P was not changed in all groups. GI produced no significant change on elemental composition. SA produced the major decrease in calcium (Ca), Ca/P ratio, and increase in N (nitrogen). MI was found to decrease Ca, Ca/P ratio and O (oxygen), and increase in C (carbon) and N. EO produced decrease in Ca and O with increased C concentration. FEG-SEM revealed surface and in-depth morphological changes on SA specimens. Minor surface alterations were observed for EO and for MI groups, and no alteration was observed on GI group. EDS indicated no difference on elemental composition of enamel bulk among groups. Conclusions: SA produced mineral loss and morphological alterations on surface and in depth. MI and EO sterilization caused mineral loss showing only slight alteration on enamel surface. GI sterilization preserves the morphological characteristics of enamel. The sterilization methods could be classified from lower to high damage as GI < MI < EO < SA. Clinical relevance: This is a comprehensive comparative study where different methods for enamel sterilization were investigated in terms of chemical changes. The results presented here may help researchers to choose the most appropriate method for their research setting and purpose.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11T17:13:06Z
2018-12-11T17:13:06Z
2018-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2148-5
Clinical Oral Investigations, v. 22, n. 2, p. 733-744, 2018.
1436-3771
1432-6981
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174837
10.1007/s00784-017-2148-5
2-s2.0-85021750558
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2148-5
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174837
identifier_str_mv Clinical Oral Investigations, v. 22, n. 2, p. 733-744, 2018.
1436-3771
1432-6981
10.1007/s00784-017-2148-5
2-s2.0-85021750558
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Clinical Oral Investigations
0,986
0,986
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 733-744
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546414703116288