Assessment of central venous catheter-associated infections using semi-quantitative or quantitative culture methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Storti, A. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Manzato, A. J. [UNESP], Pizzolitto, Antonio Carlos [UNESP], Pizzolitto, Elisabeth Loshchagin [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://serv-bib.fcfar.unesp.br/seer/index.php/Cien_Farm/article/view/384
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/108311
Resumo: Semiquantitative (Maki) and quantitative (Brun- Buisson) culture techniques were employed in the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in patients who have a short-term central venous catheter (inserted for 30 days). The diagnosis of CRBSI was based on the results of semiquantitative and quantitative culture of material from the removed catheters. Catheter tips (118) from 100 patients were evaluated by both methods. Semiquantitative analysis revealed 34 catheters (28.8%) colonized by ≥15 colonyforming units (cfu), while quantitative cultures (34 catheters, 28.8%) showed the growth of ≥103 cfu/mL. Bacteremia was confirmed in four patients by isolating microorganisms of identical species from both catheters and blood samples. Using the semiquantitative culture technique on short-term central venous catheter tips, we have shown that with a cut-off level of ≥15 cfu, the technique had 100.0% sensitivity, specificity of 68.4%, 25.0% positive predictive value (PPV) and 100.0% negative predictive value (NPV), efficiency of 71.4% and a prevalence of 9.5%. The quantitative method, with a cut-off limit of ≥103 cfu/mL, gave identical values: the sensitivity was 100.0%, specificity 68.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) 25.0%, negative predictive value (NPV) 100.0%, efficiency 71.4% and prevalence 9.5%. We concluded that the semiquantitative and quantitative culture methods, evaluated in parallel, for the first time in Brazil, have similar sensitivity and specificity. Keywords: central venous catheter; semi-quantitative culture; quantitative culture; catheter-related bacteremia.
id UNSP_78b4942347add1a1432e852b201dd6f7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/108311
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Assessment of central venous catheter-associated infections using semi-quantitative or quantitative culture methodscentral venous cathetersemi-quantitative culturequantitative culturecatheter-related bacteremiaFarmacotécnicaSemiquantitative (Maki) and quantitative (Brun- Buisson) culture techniques were employed in the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in patients who have a short-term central venous catheter (inserted for 30 days). The diagnosis of CRBSI was based on the results of semiquantitative and quantitative culture of material from the removed catheters. Catheter tips (118) from 100 patients were evaluated by both methods. Semiquantitative analysis revealed 34 catheters (28.8%) colonized by ≥15 colonyforming units (cfu), while quantitative cultures (34 catheters, 28.8%) showed the growth of ≥103 cfu/mL. Bacteremia was confirmed in four patients by isolating microorganisms of identical species from both catheters and blood samples. Using the semiquantitative culture technique on short-term central venous catheter tips, we have shown that with a cut-off level of ≥15 cfu, the technique had 100.0% sensitivity, specificity of 68.4%, 25.0% positive predictive value (PPV) and 100.0% negative predictive value (NPV), efficiency of 71.4% and a prevalence of 9.5%. The quantitative method, with a cut-off limit of ≥103 cfu/mL, gave identical values: the sensitivity was 100.0%, specificity 68.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) 25.0%, negative predictive value (NPV) 100.0%, efficiency 71.4% and prevalence 9.5%. We concluded that the semiquantitative and quantitative culture methods, evaluated in parallel, for the first time in Brazil, have similar sensitivity and specificity. Keywords: central venous catheter; semi-quantitative culture; quantitative culture; catheter-related bacteremia.Departamento de Análises Clínicas, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Araraquara, SP, Brasil.Departamento de Ciências de Computação e Estatística, Instituo de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, São Jose do Rio Preto, SP, BrasilDepartamento de Análises Clínicas, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Araraquara, SP, Brasil.Departamento de Ciências de Computação e Estatística, Instituo de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, São Jose do Rio Preto, SP, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Storti, A. [UNESP]Manzato, A. J. [UNESP]Pizzolitto, Antonio Carlos [UNESP]Pizzolitto, Elisabeth Loshchagin [UNESP]2014-06-24T19:55:13Z2014-06-24T19:55:13Z2006info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://serv-bib.fcfar.unesp.br/seer/index.php/Cien_Farm/article/view/384Revista de Ciências Farmacêuticas Básica e Aplicada, v. 27, n. 3, 2006, p. 213-220.1808-45322179-443Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/1083112-s2.0-34948826558ISSN1808-4532-2006-27-3-213-220.pdfRevista de Ciências Farmacêuticas Básica e Aplicadareponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista de Ciências Farmacêuticas Básica e Aplicada0,131info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-16T06:31:29Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/108311Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-01-16T06:31:29Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of central venous catheter-associated infections using semi-quantitative or quantitative culture methods
title Assessment of central venous catheter-associated infections using semi-quantitative or quantitative culture methods
spellingShingle Assessment of central venous catheter-associated infections using semi-quantitative or quantitative culture methods
Storti, A. [UNESP]
central venous catheter
semi-quantitative culture
quantitative culture
catheter-related bacteremia
Farmacotécnica
title_short Assessment of central venous catheter-associated infections using semi-quantitative or quantitative culture methods
title_full Assessment of central venous catheter-associated infections using semi-quantitative or quantitative culture methods
title_fullStr Assessment of central venous catheter-associated infections using semi-quantitative or quantitative culture methods
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of central venous catheter-associated infections using semi-quantitative or quantitative culture methods
title_sort Assessment of central venous catheter-associated infections using semi-quantitative or quantitative culture methods
author Storti, A. [UNESP]
author_facet Storti, A. [UNESP]
Manzato, A. J. [UNESP]
Pizzolitto, Antonio Carlos [UNESP]
Pizzolitto, Elisabeth Loshchagin [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Manzato, A. J. [UNESP]
Pizzolitto, Antonio Carlos [UNESP]
Pizzolitto, Elisabeth Loshchagin [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Storti, A. [UNESP]
Manzato, A. J. [UNESP]
Pizzolitto, Antonio Carlos [UNESP]
Pizzolitto, Elisabeth Loshchagin [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv central venous catheter
semi-quantitative culture
quantitative culture
catheter-related bacteremia
Farmacotécnica
topic central venous catheter
semi-quantitative culture
quantitative culture
catheter-related bacteremia
Farmacotécnica
description Semiquantitative (Maki) and quantitative (Brun- Buisson) culture techniques were employed in the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in patients who have a short-term central venous catheter (inserted for 30 days). The diagnosis of CRBSI was based on the results of semiquantitative and quantitative culture of material from the removed catheters. Catheter tips (118) from 100 patients were evaluated by both methods. Semiquantitative analysis revealed 34 catheters (28.8%) colonized by ≥15 colonyforming units (cfu), while quantitative cultures (34 catheters, 28.8%) showed the growth of ≥103 cfu/mL. Bacteremia was confirmed in four patients by isolating microorganisms of identical species from both catheters and blood samples. Using the semiquantitative culture technique on short-term central venous catheter tips, we have shown that with a cut-off level of ≥15 cfu, the technique had 100.0% sensitivity, specificity of 68.4%, 25.0% positive predictive value (PPV) and 100.0% negative predictive value (NPV), efficiency of 71.4% and a prevalence of 9.5%. The quantitative method, with a cut-off limit of ≥103 cfu/mL, gave identical values: the sensitivity was 100.0%, specificity 68.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) 25.0%, negative predictive value (NPV) 100.0%, efficiency 71.4% and prevalence 9.5%. We concluded that the semiquantitative and quantitative culture methods, evaluated in parallel, for the first time in Brazil, have similar sensitivity and specificity. Keywords: central venous catheter; semi-quantitative culture; quantitative culture; catheter-related bacteremia.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006
2014-06-24T19:55:13Z
2014-06-24T19:55:13Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://serv-bib.fcfar.unesp.br/seer/index.php/Cien_Farm/article/view/384
Revista de Ciências Farmacêuticas Básica e Aplicada, v. 27, n. 3, 2006, p. 213-220.
1808-4532
2179-443X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/108311
2-s2.0-34948826558
ISSN1808-4532-2006-27-3-213-220.pdf
url http://serv-bib.fcfar.unesp.br/seer/index.php/Cien_Farm/article/view/384
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/108311
identifier_str_mv Revista de Ciências Farmacêuticas Básica e Aplicada, v. 27, n. 3, 2006, p. 213-220.
1808-4532
2179-443X
2-s2.0-34948826558
ISSN1808-4532-2006-27-3-213-220.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências Farmacêuticas Básica e Aplicada
0,131
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências Farmacêuticas Básica e Aplicada
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965639043973120