Publication bias in five dental implant journals: An observation from 2005 to 2009

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Yuan, Judy Chia-Chun
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Shyamsunder, Nodesh, Barão, Valentim Adelino Ricardo [UNESP], Lee, Damian J., Sukotjo, Cortino
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/227159
Resumo: Purpose: This study evaluated possible publication bias and its related factors in implant-related research over time. Materials and Methods: Articles published in Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Clinical Oral Implants Research, Implant Dentistry, Journal of Oral Implantology, and The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants between 2005 and 2009 were reviewed. Nonoriginal articles were excluded. For each article included, study outcome, extramural funding source, type of study, and geographic origin were recorded. Descriptive and analytic statistics (a = .05), including the chi-square test and logistic regression analysis, were performed where appropriate. Results: From a total of 2,085 articles, 1,503 met the inclusion criteria. Of the articles analyzed, 1,226 (81.6%), 160 (10.6%), and 117 (7.8%) articles reported positive, negative, and neutral outcomes, respectively. In vitro studies, studies from Asia, and funded animal studies were more likely to report positive outcomes compared to others (P = .02, P < .0001, and P = .009, respectively). Industry-funded studies represented the lowest frequency of positive outcomes versus studies funded by other sources. Conclusions: There were a high number of implant-related studies reporting positive outcomes in the five selected journals. Some selected factors were associated with positive outcome bias. In general, funding was not associated with a positive outcome, except for animal studies. Industry-supported research did not show any association with the publication of positive outcomes. © 2011 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.
id UNSP_797fc59f26b82b7c8eeb69732b88486c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/227159
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Publication bias in five dental implant journals: An observation from 2005 to 2009Dental implantsFundingIndustryPublication biasPurpose: This study evaluated possible publication bias and its related factors in implant-related research over time. Materials and Methods: Articles published in Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Clinical Oral Implants Research, Implant Dentistry, Journal of Oral Implantology, and The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants between 2005 and 2009 were reviewed. Nonoriginal articles were excluded. For each article included, study outcome, extramural funding source, type of study, and geographic origin were recorded. Descriptive and analytic statistics (a = .05), including the chi-square test and logistic regression analysis, were performed where appropriate. Results: From a total of 2,085 articles, 1,503 met the inclusion criteria. Of the articles analyzed, 1,226 (81.6%), 160 (10.6%), and 117 (7.8%) articles reported positive, negative, and neutral outcomes, respectively. In vitro studies, studies from Asia, and funded animal studies were more likely to report positive outcomes compared to others (P = .02, P < .0001, and P = .009, respectively). Industry-funded studies represented the lowest frequency of positive outcomes versus studies funded by other sources. Conclusions: There were a high number of implant-related studies reporting positive outcomes in the five selected journals. Some selected factors were associated with positive outcome bias. In general, funding was not associated with a positive outcome, except for animal studies. Industry-supported research did not show any association with the publication of positive outcomes. © 2011 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.Department of Restorative Dentistry College of Dentistry University of Illinois at ChicagoDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba, Sao PauloDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba, Sao PauloUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Yuan, Judy Chia-ChunShyamsunder, NodeshBarão, Valentim Adelino Ricardo [UNESP]Lee, Damian J.Sukotjo, Cortino2022-04-29T07:11:47Z2022-04-29T07:11:47Z2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1024-1032International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 26, n. 5, p. 1024-1032, 2011.0882-2786http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2271592-s2.0-84875881448Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-29T07:11:47Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/227159Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:32:59.700221Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Publication bias in five dental implant journals: An observation from 2005 to 2009
title Publication bias in five dental implant journals: An observation from 2005 to 2009
spellingShingle Publication bias in five dental implant journals: An observation from 2005 to 2009
Yuan, Judy Chia-Chun
Dental implants
Funding
Industry
Publication bias
title_short Publication bias in five dental implant journals: An observation from 2005 to 2009
title_full Publication bias in five dental implant journals: An observation from 2005 to 2009
title_fullStr Publication bias in five dental implant journals: An observation from 2005 to 2009
title_full_unstemmed Publication bias in five dental implant journals: An observation from 2005 to 2009
title_sort Publication bias in five dental implant journals: An observation from 2005 to 2009
author Yuan, Judy Chia-Chun
author_facet Yuan, Judy Chia-Chun
Shyamsunder, Nodesh
Barão, Valentim Adelino Ricardo [UNESP]
Lee, Damian J.
Sukotjo, Cortino
author_role author
author2 Shyamsunder, Nodesh
Barão, Valentim Adelino Ricardo [UNESP]
Lee, Damian J.
Sukotjo, Cortino
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv University of Illinois at Chicago
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Yuan, Judy Chia-Chun
Shyamsunder, Nodesh
Barão, Valentim Adelino Ricardo [UNESP]
Lee, Damian J.
Sukotjo, Cortino
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental implants
Funding
Industry
Publication bias
topic Dental implants
Funding
Industry
Publication bias
description Purpose: This study evaluated possible publication bias and its related factors in implant-related research over time. Materials and Methods: Articles published in Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Clinical Oral Implants Research, Implant Dentistry, Journal of Oral Implantology, and The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants between 2005 and 2009 were reviewed. Nonoriginal articles were excluded. For each article included, study outcome, extramural funding source, type of study, and geographic origin were recorded. Descriptive and analytic statistics (a = .05), including the chi-square test and logistic regression analysis, were performed where appropriate. Results: From a total of 2,085 articles, 1,503 met the inclusion criteria. Of the articles analyzed, 1,226 (81.6%), 160 (10.6%), and 117 (7.8%) articles reported positive, negative, and neutral outcomes, respectively. In vitro studies, studies from Asia, and funded animal studies were more likely to report positive outcomes compared to others (P = .02, P < .0001, and P = .009, respectively). Industry-funded studies represented the lowest frequency of positive outcomes versus studies funded by other sources. Conclusions: There were a high number of implant-related studies reporting positive outcomes in the five selected journals. Some selected factors were associated with positive outcome bias. In general, funding was not associated with a positive outcome, except for animal studies. Industry-supported research did not show any association with the publication of positive outcomes. © 2011 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
2022-04-29T07:11:47Z
2022-04-29T07:11:47Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 26, n. 5, p. 1024-1032, 2011.
0882-2786
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/227159
2-s2.0-84875881448
identifier_str_mv International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 26, n. 5, p. 1024-1032, 2011.
0882-2786
2-s2.0-84875881448
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/227159
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1024-1032
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129436212527104