Analysis and comparison of the STR genotypes called with HipSTR, STRait Razor and toaSTR by using next generation sequencing data in a Brazilian population sample
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102676 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231614 |
Resumo: | Short tandem repeats (STRs) are particularly difficult to genotype with rapid evolving next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. Long amplicons containing repetitive sequences result in alignment and genotyping errors. Stutters arising from polymerase slippage often result in reads with additional or missing repeat copies. Many tools are available for analysis of STR markers from NGS data. This study has evaluated the concordance of the HipSTR, STRait Razor, and toaSTR tools for STR genotype calling; NGS data obtained from a highly genetically diverse Brazilian population sample have been used. We found that toaSTR can retrieve a larger number of genotypes (93.8%), whereas HipSTR (84.9%) and STRait Razor present much lower genotype calling (75.3%). Accuracy levels for genotype calling are very similar (identical genotypes ~95% and correct alleles ~ 97.5%) across the three methods. All the markers presenting the same genotype through the methods are in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. We found that combined match probability and combined exclusion power are 2.90 × 10−28 and 0.99999999982, respectively. Although toaSTR has varying locus-specific differences and better overall performance of toaSTR, the three programs are reliable genotyping tools. Notwithstanding, additional effort is necessary to improve the genotype calling accuracy of next-generation sequencing datasets. |
id |
UNSP_7a5ff2076edc334987a26f7acd845fc7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/231614 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Analysis and comparison of the STR genotypes called with HipSTR, STRait Razor and toaSTR by using next generation sequencing data in a Brazilian population sampleBioinformaticsBrazilCODISForensic geneticsMassively parallel sequencingShort tandem repeatsShort tandem repeats (STRs) are particularly difficult to genotype with rapid evolving next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. Long amplicons containing repetitive sequences result in alignment and genotyping errors. Stutters arising from polymerase slippage often result in reads with additional or missing repeat copies. Many tools are available for analysis of STR markers from NGS data. This study has evaluated the concordance of the HipSTR, STRait Razor, and toaSTR tools for STR genotype calling; NGS data obtained from a highly genetically diverse Brazilian population sample have been used. We found that toaSTR can retrieve a larger number of genotypes (93.8%), whereas HipSTR (84.9%) and STRait Razor present much lower genotype calling (75.3%). Accuracy levels for genotype calling are very similar (identical genotypes ~95% and correct alleles ~ 97.5%) across the three methods. All the markers presenting the same genotype through the methods are in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. We found that combined match probability and combined exclusion power are 2.90 × 10−28 and 0.99999999982, respectively. Although toaSTR has varying locus-specific differences and better overall performance of toaSTR, the three programs are reliable genotyping tools. Notwithstanding, additional effort is necessary to improve the genotype calling accuracy of next-generation sequencing datasets.Departamento de Química Laboratório de Pesquisas Forenses e Genômicas Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto Universidade de São Paulo, SPDepartamento de Genética Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto Universidade de São Paulo, SPSoftec S.R.LDivisão de Imunologia Clínica Departamento de Clínica Médica Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto Universidade de São Paulo, SPSão Paulo State University (UNESP) Department of Pathology School of Medicine, SPSão Paulo State University (UNESP) Department of Pathology School of Medicine, SPUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Softec S.R.LUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Valle-Silva, GuilhermeFrontanilla, Tamara SoledadAyala, JesúsDonadi, Eduardo AntonioSimões, Aguinaldo LuizCastelli, Erick C. [UNESP]Mendes-Junior, Celso Teixeira2022-04-29T08:46:35Z2022-04-29T08:46:35Z2022-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102676Forensic Science International: Genetics, v. 58.1878-03261872-4973http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23161410.1016/j.fsigen.2022.1026762-s2.0-85124188207Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengForensic Science International: Geneticsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-29T08:46:35Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/231614Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:49:19.516293Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis and comparison of the STR genotypes called with HipSTR, STRait Razor and toaSTR by using next generation sequencing data in a Brazilian population sample |
title |
Analysis and comparison of the STR genotypes called with HipSTR, STRait Razor and toaSTR by using next generation sequencing data in a Brazilian population sample |
spellingShingle |
Analysis and comparison of the STR genotypes called with HipSTR, STRait Razor and toaSTR by using next generation sequencing data in a Brazilian population sample Valle-Silva, Guilherme Bioinformatics Brazil CODIS Forensic genetics Massively parallel sequencing Short tandem repeats |
title_short |
Analysis and comparison of the STR genotypes called with HipSTR, STRait Razor and toaSTR by using next generation sequencing data in a Brazilian population sample |
title_full |
Analysis and comparison of the STR genotypes called with HipSTR, STRait Razor and toaSTR by using next generation sequencing data in a Brazilian population sample |
title_fullStr |
Analysis and comparison of the STR genotypes called with HipSTR, STRait Razor and toaSTR by using next generation sequencing data in a Brazilian population sample |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis and comparison of the STR genotypes called with HipSTR, STRait Razor and toaSTR by using next generation sequencing data in a Brazilian population sample |
title_sort |
Analysis and comparison of the STR genotypes called with HipSTR, STRait Razor and toaSTR by using next generation sequencing data in a Brazilian population sample |
author |
Valle-Silva, Guilherme |
author_facet |
Valle-Silva, Guilherme Frontanilla, Tamara Soledad Ayala, Jesús Donadi, Eduardo Antonio Simões, Aguinaldo Luiz Castelli, Erick C. [UNESP] Mendes-Junior, Celso Teixeira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Frontanilla, Tamara Soledad Ayala, Jesús Donadi, Eduardo Antonio Simões, Aguinaldo Luiz Castelli, Erick C. [UNESP] Mendes-Junior, Celso Teixeira |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Softec S.R.L Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Valle-Silva, Guilherme Frontanilla, Tamara Soledad Ayala, Jesús Donadi, Eduardo Antonio Simões, Aguinaldo Luiz Castelli, Erick C. [UNESP] Mendes-Junior, Celso Teixeira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bioinformatics Brazil CODIS Forensic genetics Massively parallel sequencing Short tandem repeats |
topic |
Bioinformatics Brazil CODIS Forensic genetics Massively parallel sequencing Short tandem repeats |
description |
Short tandem repeats (STRs) are particularly difficult to genotype with rapid evolving next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. Long amplicons containing repetitive sequences result in alignment and genotyping errors. Stutters arising from polymerase slippage often result in reads with additional or missing repeat copies. Many tools are available for analysis of STR markers from NGS data. This study has evaluated the concordance of the HipSTR, STRait Razor, and toaSTR tools for STR genotype calling; NGS data obtained from a highly genetically diverse Brazilian population sample have been used. We found that toaSTR can retrieve a larger number of genotypes (93.8%), whereas HipSTR (84.9%) and STRait Razor present much lower genotype calling (75.3%). Accuracy levels for genotype calling are very similar (identical genotypes ~95% and correct alleles ~ 97.5%) across the three methods. All the markers presenting the same genotype through the methods are in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. We found that combined match probability and combined exclusion power are 2.90 × 10−28 and 0.99999999982, respectively. Although toaSTR has varying locus-specific differences and better overall performance of toaSTR, the three programs are reliable genotyping tools. Notwithstanding, additional effort is necessary to improve the genotype calling accuracy of next-generation sequencing datasets. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-29T08:46:35Z 2022-04-29T08:46:35Z 2022-05-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102676 Forensic Science International: Genetics, v. 58. 1878-0326 1872-4973 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231614 10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102676 2-s2.0-85124188207 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102676 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231614 |
identifier_str_mv |
Forensic Science International: Genetics, v. 58. 1878-0326 1872-4973 10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102676 2-s2.0-85124188207 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Forensic Science International: Genetics |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128983775051776 |