Sobre graça, dignidade e beleza em Friedrich Schiller e Heinrich von Kleist

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Carina Zanelato [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/126531
http://www.athena.biblioteca.unesp.br/exlibris/bd/cathedra/14-07-2015/000841172.pdf
Resumo: This study has the objective to discuss the theories of Friedrich Schiller (1759-1805) and Heinrich von Kleist (1777-1811) about grace, dignity, beauty and sublime, comparing them in order to show the differences and the confluences of these aesthetic concepts that were developed in the classical period (with Schiller) and romantic (with Kleist).Using as a basis for the analysis of these categories the essays On Grace and Dignity (Über Anmut und Würde), by Schiller and On the Marionette Theatre (Über das Marionettentheater), by Kleist, we are showing as the aesthetic theories of the two authors reflect the tensions between Classicism and Romanticism in Germany, and how these tensions establish differences between the idea of form in Schiller and Kleist, considering that classical harmony and the dismantling of this harmony are common themes. Schiller values the maintenance of harmony and search in the art a way for men to achieve balance; Kleist, through the deconstruction of the classical model, play with form, dismantling it, turning it into a stage for the advent of the Dionysian ritual; no more serenity and harmony of Apollo that reign, but the frenzy of Dionysus, which dominates and expands in an extraordinary way. Therefore, the categories of beauty, grace and sublime acquire in Schiller and Kleist different and similar dimensions, making possible the comparison of their works. Utilizing the notes made by Friedrich Schiller about the tragedy as an instance that provides entertainment to man and freedom through moral means, we are using the plays Die Jungfrau von Orleans (Friedrich Schiller, 1801) and Penthesilea (Heinrich von Kleist, 1808) as a form of practical exemplification of how these authors used the aesthetic conceptions mentioned above for the construction of the action of his heroines, characterizing them to attend these aesthetic assumptions
id UNSP_7ab638daf978a75c9e98c0f28df2ebb7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/126531
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Sobre graça, dignidade e beleza em Friedrich Schiller e Heinrich von KleistSchiller, Friedrich 1759-1805Kleist, Heinrich von 1777-1811EstéticaDignidadeClassicismoRomantismoLiteraturaLiteratureThis study has the objective to discuss the theories of Friedrich Schiller (1759-1805) and Heinrich von Kleist (1777-1811) about grace, dignity, beauty and sublime, comparing them in order to show the differences and the confluences of these aesthetic concepts that were developed in the classical period (with Schiller) and romantic (with Kleist).Using as a basis for the analysis of these categories the essays On Grace and Dignity (Über Anmut und Würde), by Schiller and On the Marionette Theatre (Über das Marionettentheater), by Kleist, we are showing as the aesthetic theories of the two authors reflect the tensions between Classicism and Romanticism in Germany, and how these tensions establish differences between the idea of form in Schiller and Kleist, considering that classical harmony and the dismantling of this harmony are common themes. Schiller values the maintenance of harmony and search in the art a way for men to achieve balance; Kleist, through the deconstruction of the classical model, play with form, dismantling it, turning it into a stage for the advent of the Dionysian ritual; no more serenity and harmony of Apollo that reign, but the frenzy of Dionysus, which dominates and expands in an extraordinary way. Therefore, the categories of beauty, grace and sublime acquire in Schiller and Kleist different and similar dimensions, making possible the comparison of their works. Utilizing the notes made by Friedrich Schiller about the tragedy as an instance that provides entertainment to man and freedom through moral means, we are using the plays Die Jungfrau von Orleans (Friedrich Schiller, 1801) and Penthesilea (Heinrich von Kleist, 1808) as a form of practical exemplification of how these authors used the aesthetic conceptions mentioned above for the construction of the action of his heroines, characterizing them to attend these aesthetic assumptionsO presente estudo tem como objetivo discutir as teorias de Friedrich Schiller (1759-1805) e Heinrich von Kleist (1777-1811) sobre a graça, a dignidade, o belo e o sublime, comparando-as, a fim de mostrar as divergências e as confluências dessas concepções estéticas, que foram desenvolvidas nos períodos clássico (com Schiller) e romântico (com Kleist). Tendo como referencial principal para a análise dessas categorias os ensaios Sobre graça e dignidade (Über Anmut und Würde), de Schiller, e Sobre o teatro de marionetes (Über das Marionettentheater), de Kleist, procuramos mostrar na dissertação como as teorias estéticas dos dois autores refletem as tensões existentes entre Classicismo e Romantismo na Alemanha, e como essas tensões estabelecem diferenças entre a ideia de forma em Schiller e Kleist, tendo em vista que a harmonia clássica e a desarticulação dessa harmonia são temas frequentes. Schiller preza pela manutenção da harmonia e busca na arte o caminho para que o homem alcance o equilíbrio; Kleist, pela via da desconstrução do modelo clássico, joga com a forma, de maneira a desarticulá-la, transformando-a em palco para o advento do ritual dionisíaco; não mais a serenidade e harmonia de Apolo que imperam, mas sim o frenesi de Dionísio, que domina e se expande de maneira extraordinária. Dessa maneira, as categorias do belo, da graça e do sublime ganham em Schiller e Kleist dimensões díspares e afins, abrindo espaço para a comparação de suas obras. Aproveitando-nos dos apontamentos feitos por Friedrich Schiller sobre a tragédia como instância que proporciona ao homem o entretenimento e a liberdade através de meios morais, utilizamos as peças Die Jungfrau von Orleans (Friedrich Schiller, 1801) e Penthesilea (Heinrich von Kleist, 1808) como via de exemplificação prática de como estes autores usaram as concepções estéticas apontadas acima para a construção da ação de suas heroínas...Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Volobuef, Karin [UNESP]Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Silva, Carina Zanelato [UNESP]2015-08-20T17:10:04Z2015-08-20T17:10:04Z2015-03-20info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis169 f.application/pdfSILVA, Carina Zanelato. Sobre graça, dignidade e beleza em Friedrich Schiller e Heinrich von Kleist. 2015. 169 f. Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Ciencias e Letras (Campus de Araraquara), 2015.http://hdl.handle.net/11449/126531000841172http://www.athena.biblioteca.unesp.br/exlibris/bd/cathedra/14-07-2015/000841172.pdf33004030016P044198930597313370000-0002-9905-1072Alephreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-12T14:27:15Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/126531Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:41:26.088053Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sobre graça, dignidade e beleza em Friedrich Schiller e Heinrich von Kleist
title Sobre graça, dignidade e beleza em Friedrich Schiller e Heinrich von Kleist
spellingShingle Sobre graça, dignidade e beleza em Friedrich Schiller e Heinrich von Kleist
Silva, Carina Zanelato [UNESP]
Schiller, Friedrich 1759-1805
Kleist, Heinrich von 1777-1811
Estética
Dignidade
Classicismo
Romantismo
Literatura
Literature
title_short Sobre graça, dignidade e beleza em Friedrich Schiller e Heinrich von Kleist
title_full Sobre graça, dignidade e beleza em Friedrich Schiller e Heinrich von Kleist
title_fullStr Sobre graça, dignidade e beleza em Friedrich Schiller e Heinrich von Kleist
title_full_unstemmed Sobre graça, dignidade e beleza em Friedrich Schiller e Heinrich von Kleist
title_sort Sobre graça, dignidade e beleza em Friedrich Schiller e Heinrich von Kleist
author Silva, Carina Zanelato [UNESP]
author_facet Silva, Carina Zanelato [UNESP]
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Volobuef, Karin [UNESP]
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Carina Zanelato [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Schiller, Friedrich 1759-1805
Kleist, Heinrich von 1777-1811
Estética
Dignidade
Classicismo
Romantismo
Literatura
Literature
topic Schiller, Friedrich 1759-1805
Kleist, Heinrich von 1777-1811
Estética
Dignidade
Classicismo
Romantismo
Literatura
Literature
description This study has the objective to discuss the theories of Friedrich Schiller (1759-1805) and Heinrich von Kleist (1777-1811) about grace, dignity, beauty and sublime, comparing them in order to show the differences and the confluences of these aesthetic concepts that were developed in the classical period (with Schiller) and romantic (with Kleist).Using as a basis for the analysis of these categories the essays On Grace and Dignity (Über Anmut und Würde), by Schiller and On the Marionette Theatre (Über das Marionettentheater), by Kleist, we are showing as the aesthetic theories of the two authors reflect the tensions between Classicism and Romanticism in Germany, and how these tensions establish differences between the idea of form in Schiller and Kleist, considering that classical harmony and the dismantling of this harmony are common themes. Schiller values the maintenance of harmony and search in the art a way for men to achieve balance; Kleist, through the deconstruction of the classical model, play with form, dismantling it, turning it into a stage for the advent of the Dionysian ritual; no more serenity and harmony of Apollo that reign, but the frenzy of Dionysus, which dominates and expands in an extraordinary way. Therefore, the categories of beauty, grace and sublime acquire in Schiller and Kleist different and similar dimensions, making possible the comparison of their works. Utilizing the notes made by Friedrich Schiller about the tragedy as an instance that provides entertainment to man and freedom through moral means, we are using the plays Die Jungfrau von Orleans (Friedrich Schiller, 1801) and Penthesilea (Heinrich von Kleist, 1808) as a form of practical exemplification of how these authors used the aesthetic conceptions mentioned above for the construction of the action of his heroines, characterizing them to attend these aesthetic assumptions
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-08-20T17:10:04Z
2015-08-20T17:10:04Z
2015-03-20
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv SILVA, Carina Zanelato. Sobre graça, dignidade e beleza em Friedrich Schiller e Heinrich von Kleist. 2015. 169 f. Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Ciencias e Letras (Campus de Araraquara), 2015.
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/126531
000841172
http://www.athena.biblioteca.unesp.br/exlibris/bd/cathedra/14-07-2015/000841172.pdf
33004030016P0
4419893059731337
0000-0002-9905-1072
identifier_str_mv SILVA, Carina Zanelato. Sobre graça, dignidade e beleza em Friedrich Schiller e Heinrich von Kleist. 2015. 169 f. Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Ciencias e Letras (Campus de Araraquara), 2015.
000841172
33004030016P0
4419893059731337
0000-0002-9905-1072
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/126531
http://www.athena.biblioteca.unesp.br/exlibris/bd/cathedra/14-07-2015/000841172.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 169 f.
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Aleph
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128845589512192