Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199529 |
Resumo: | Background: Intermaxillary elastics are widely used in corrective orthodontic treatment particularly for the interdigitation of buccal segments and the correction of the midline. However, latex has been known to cause allergy, which may restrict elastic use. As alternative materials, non-latex elastics are available. However, clinicians must be aware of their mechanical properties, especially those of deformation and force degradation that affect these materials over time. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare force degradation and deformation of 3/16 non-latex and latex elastics supplied by several manufacturers. Materials and methods: Special acrylic plates were fabricated to incorporate orthodontic brackets to which elastics were attached and stretched to a distance of approximately 20 mm. The internal diameter and force magnitude of each elastic was measured at time intervals of 0, 24, 72 and 504 hours. The samples were stored in artificial saliva at room temperature during the entire experimental period. Results: Latex elastics showed smaller and more uniform deformation than the non-latex elastics. The non-latex elastics showed greater degradation at all time intervals (p < 0.001). The Morelli brand delivered greater force than other brands for both the latex and non-latex elastics at all time intervals (p < 0.05). The G&H latex elastics showed greater force degradation in comparison with the other brands (p < 0.05). The evaluation of the Dentaurum and Orthopli non-latex elastics showed greater degradation (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The non-latex elastics showed greater force degradation than the latex elastics. Of the latex elastics, G&H showed greater force degradation, and for the non-latex elastics, those made by Dentaurum and Orthopli degraded most. |
id |
UNSP_7d066e012203d86b56d4dea69114293c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199529 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elasticsBackground: Intermaxillary elastics are widely used in corrective orthodontic treatment particularly for the interdigitation of buccal segments and the correction of the midline. However, latex has been known to cause allergy, which may restrict elastic use. As alternative materials, non-latex elastics are available. However, clinicians must be aware of their mechanical properties, especially those of deformation and force degradation that affect these materials over time. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare force degradation and deformation of 3/16 non-latex and latex elastics supplied by several manufacturers. Materials and methods: Special acrylic plates were fabricated to incorporate orthodontic brackets to which elastics were attached and stretched to a distance of approximately 20 mm. The internal diameter and force magnitude of each elastic was measured at time intervals of 0, 24, 72 and 504 hours. The samples were stored in artificial saliva at room temperature during the entire experimental period. Results: Latex elastics showed smaller and more uniform deformation than the non-latex elastics. The non-latex elastics showed greater degradation at all time intervals (p < 0.001). The Morelli brand delivered greater force than other brands for both the latex and non-latex elastics at all time intervals (p < 0.05). The G&H latex elastics showed greater force degradation in comparison with the other brands (p < 0.05). The evaluation of the Dentaurum and Orthopli non-latex elastics showed greater degradation (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The non-latex elastics showed greater force degradation than the latex elastics. Of the latex elastics, G&H showed greater force degradation, and for the non-latex elastics, those made by Dentaurum and Orthopli degraded most.Department of Orthodontics Federal University of Rio de Janeiro UFRJDepartment of Pediatric Clinics Ribeirão Preto Dental School University of São PauloDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Araraquara Dental School - UNESPDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Araraquara Dental School - UNESPUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Oliveira, Pedro Lima EmmerichMatsumoto, Mírian Aiko NakaneFaria, Gisele [UNESP]Romano, Fábio Lourenço2020-12-12T01:42:27Z2020-12-12T01:42:27Z2017-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article64-72Australasian Orthodontic Journal, v. 33, n. 1, p. 64-72, 2017.2207-7480http://hdl.handle.net/11449/1995292-s2.0-85073762086Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAustralasian Orthodontic Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T18:03:43Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199529Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T18:03:43Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics |
title |
Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics |
spellingShingle |
Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics Oliveira, Pedro Lima Emmerich |
title_short |
Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics |
title_full |
Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics |
title_fullStr |
Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics |
title_sort |
Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics |
author |
Oliveira, Pedro Lima Emmerich |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Pedro Lima Emmerich Matsumoto, Mírian Aiko Nakane Faria, Gisele [UNESP] Romano, Fábio Lourenço |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Matsumoto, Mírian Aiko Nakane Faria, Gisele [UNESP] Romano, Fábio Lourenço |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Pedro Lima Emmerich Matsumoto, Mírian Aiko Nakane Faria, Gisele [UNESP] Romano, Fábio Lourenço |
description |
Background: Intermaxillary elastics are widely used in corrective orthodontic treatment particularly for the interdigitation of buccal segments and the correction of the midline. However, latex has been known to cause allergy, which may restrict elastic use. As alternative materials, non-latex elastics are available. However, clinicians must be aware of their mechanical properties, especially those of deformation and force degradation that affect these materials over time. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare force degradation and deformation of 3/16 non-latex and latex elastics supplied by several manufacturers. Materials and methods: Special acrylic plates were fabricated to incorporate orthodontic brackets to which elastics were attached and stretched to a distance of approximately 20 mm. The internal diameter and force magnitude of each elastic was measured at time intervals of 0, 24, 72 and 504 hours. The samples were stored in artificial saliva at room temperature during the entire experimental period. Results: Latex elastics showed smaller and more uniform deformation than the non-latex elastics. The non-latex elastics showed greater degradation at all time intervals (p < 0.001). The Morelli brand delivered greater force than other brands for both the latex and non-latex elastics at all time intervals (p < 0.05). The G&H latex elastics showed greater force degradation in comparison with the other brands (p < 0.05). The evaluation of the Dentaurum and Orthopli non-latex elastics showed greater degradation (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The non-latex elastics showed greater force degradation than the latex elastics. Of the latex elastics, G&H showed greater force degradation, and for the non-latex elastics, those made by Dentaurum and Orthopli degraded most. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-05-01 2020-12-12T01:42:27Z 2020-12-12T01:42:27Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Australasian Orthodontic Journal, v. 33, n. 1, p. 64-72, 2017. 2207-7480 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199529 2-s2.0-85073762086 |
identifier_str_mv |
Australasian Orthodontic Journal, v. 33, n. 1, p. 64-72, 2017. 2207-7480 2-s2.0-85073762086 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199529 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Australasian Orthodontic Journal |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
64-72 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546418297634816 |