Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Pedro Lima Emmerich
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Matsumoto, Mírian Aiko Nakane, Faria, Gisele [UNESP], Romano, Fábio Lourenço
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199529
Resumo: Background: Intermaxillary elastics are widely used in corrective orthodontic treatment particularly for the interdigitation of buccal segments and the correction of the midline. However, latex has been known to cause allergy, which may restrict elastic use. As alternative materials, non-latex elastics are available. However, clinicians must be aware of their mechanical properties, especially those of deformation and force degradation that affect these materials over time. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare force degradation and deformation of 3/16 non-latex and latex elastics supplied by several manufacturers. Materials and methods: Special acrylic plates were fabricated to incorporate orthodontic brackets to which elastics were attached and stretched to a distance of approximately 20 mm. The internal diameter and force magnitude of each elastic was measured at time intervals of 0, 24, 72 and 504 hours. The samples were stored in artificial saliva at room temperature during the entire experimental period. Results: Latex elastics showed smaller and more uniform deformation than the non-latex elastics. The non-latex elastics showed greater degradation at all time intervals (p < 0.001). The Morelli brand delivered greater force than other brands for both the latex and non-latex elastics at all time intervals (p < 0.05). The G&H latex elastics showed greater force degradation in comparison with the other brands (p < 0.05). The evaluation of the Dentaurum and Orthopli non-latex elastics showed greater degradation (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The non-latex elastics showed greater force degradation than the latex elastics. Of the latex elastics, G&H showed greater force degradation, and for the non-latex elastics, those made by Dentaurum and Orthopli degraded most.
id UNSP_7d066e012203d86b56d4dea69114293c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199529
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elasticsBackground: Intermaxillary elastics are widely used in corrective orthodontic treatment particularly for the interdigitation of buccal segments and the correction of the midline. However, latex has been known to cause allergy, which may restrict elastic use. As alternative materials, non-latex elastics are available. However, clinicians must be aware of their mechanical properties, especially those of deformation and force degradation that affect these materials over time. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare force degradation and deformation of 3/16 non-latex and latex elastics supplied by several manufacturers. Materials and methods: Special acrylic plates were fabricated to incorporate orthodontic brackets to which elastics were attached and stretched to a distance of approximately 20 mm. The internal diameter and force magnitude of each elastic was measured at time intervals of 0, 24, 72 and 504 hours. The samples were stored in artificial saliva at room temperature during the entire experimental period. Results: Latex elastics showed smaller and more uniform deformation than the non-latex elastics. The non-latex elastics showed greater degradation at all time intervals (p < 0.001). The Morelli brand delivered greater force than other brands for both the latex and non-latex elastics at all time intervals (p < 0.05). The G&H latex elastics showed greater force degradation in comparison with the other brands (p < 0.05). The evaluation of the Dentaurum and Orthopli non-latex elastics showed greater degradation (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The non-latex elastics showed greater force degradation than the latex elastics. Of the latex elastics, G&H showed greater force degradation, and for the non-latex elastics, those made by Dentaurum and Orthopli degraded most.Department of Orthodontics Federal University of Rio de Janeiro UFRJDepartment of Pediatric Clinics Ribeirão Preto Dental School University of São PauloDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Araraquara Dental School - UNESPDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Araraquara Dental School - UNESPUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Oliveira, Pedro Lima EmmerichMatsumoto, Mírian Aiko NakaneFaria, Gisele [UNESP]Romano, Fábio Lourenço2020-12-12T01:42:27Z2020-12-12T01:42:27Z2017-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article64-72Australasian Orthodontic Journal, v. 33, n. 1, p. 64-72, 2017.2207-7480http://hdl.handle.net/11449/1995292-s2.0-85073762086Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAustralasian Orthodontic Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T18:03:43Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199529Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T18:03:43Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics
title Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics
spellingShingle Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics
Oliveira, Pedro Lima Emmerich
title_short Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics
title_full Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics
title_fullStr Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics
title_full_unstemmed Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics
title_sort Degradation and deformation of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics
author Oliveira, Pedro Lima Emmerich
author_facet Oliveira, Pedro Lima Emmerich
Matsumoto, Mírian Aiko Nakane
Faria, Gisele [UNESP]
Romano, Fábio Lourenço
author_role author
author2 Matsumoto, Mírian Aiko Nakane
Faria, Gisele [UNESP]
Romano, Fábio Lourenço
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Pedro Lima Emmerich
Matsumoto, Mírian Aiko Nakane
Faria, Gisele [UNESP]
Romano, Fábio Lourenço
description Background: Intermaxillary elastics are widely used in corrective orthodontic treatment particularly for the interdigitation of buccal segments and the correction of the midline. However, latex has been known to cause allergy, which may restrict elastic use. As alternative materials, non-latex elastics are available. However, clinicians must be aware of their mechanical properties, especially those of deformation and force degradation that affect these materials over time. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare force degradation and deformation of 3/16 non-latex and latex elastics supplied by several manufacturers. Materials and methods: Special acrylic plates were fabricated to incorporate orthodontic brackets to which elastics were attached and stretched to a distance of approximately 20 mm. The internal diameter and force magnitude of each elastic was measured at time intervals of 0, 24, 72 and 504 hours. The samples were stored in artificial saliva at room temperature during the entire experimental period. Results: Latex elastics showed smaller and more uniform deformation than the non-latex elastics. The non-latex elastics showed greater degradation at all time intervals (p < 0.001). The Morelli brand delivered greater force than other brands for both the latex and non-latex elastics at all time intervals (p < 0.05). The G&H latex elastics showed greater force degradation in comparison with the other brands (p < 0.05). The evaluation of the Dentaurum and Orthopli non-latex elastics showed greater degradation (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The non-latex elastics showed greater force degradation than the latex elastics. Of the latex elastics, G&H showed greater force degradation, and for the non-latex elastics, those made by Dentaurum and Orthopli degraded most.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-01
2020-12-12T01:42:27Z
2020-12-12T01:42:27Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Australasian Orthodontic Journal, v. 33, n. 1, p. 64-72, 2017.
2207-7480
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199529
2-s2.0-85073762086
identifier_str_mv Australasian Orthodontic Journal, v. 33, n. 1, p. 64-72, 2017.
2207-7480
2-s2.0-85073762086
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199529
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Australasian Orthodontic Journal
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 64-72
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546418297634816