Bioethics Education on Medical Students: Opinions About Ethical Dilemmas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins, Vera
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Santos, Cristina, Ricou, Miguel, Bataglia, Patrícia [UNESP], Duarte, Ivone
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21582440211057118
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222970
Resumo: Medical education aims to train professionals who are capable of making extremely complex decisions. As part of the medical curriculum, bioethics education could have an important role in promoting moral development and decision-making in medical students. This study aims to determine if, after a Bioethics and Professional Deontology course, medical students would present a change of opinion on three ethical dilemmas. A quantitative and longitudinal study was developed by applying the MCTxt (Moral Competence Test extended), composed of three ethical dilemmas (Worker, doctor, and judge dilemmas), to a sample of 70, fourth year medical students, from a Portuguese medical school. The questionnaire was applied at the beginning and end of a bioethics course, with a 3 month time interval. For this study the opinion scores were analyzed and described using the mean and standard deviation. The comparison of these scores, at both times, were performed using t-tests for paired samples. A significance level of 5% was used. For students who were neutral in the first application, the majority went on to agree or disagree with the performance of the dilemma character, ultimately showing less indecision at the end of bioethics course. The results suggest that, after the bioethics course, students have lower indecision, however the changes were very tenuous. Bioethics education is important to promote more opportunities for reflection and discussion, to stimulate critical judgment, and the ability to make decisions by medical students. Further research could help to better understand this subject.
id UNSP_82a0e307f81b9311804940753c4216b3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222970
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Bioethics Education on Medical Students: Opinions About Ethical Dilemmasbioethicsdecision-makingmedical studentsmoral developmentopinionteachingMedical education aims to train professionals who are capable of making extremely complex decisions. As part of the medical curriculum, bioethics education could have an important role in promoting moral development and decision-making in medical students. This study aims to determine if, after a Bioethics and Professional Deontology course, medical students would present a change of opinion on three ethical dilemmas. A quantitative and longitudinal study was developed by applying the MCTxt (Moral Competence Test extended), composed of three ethical dilemmas (Worker, doctor, and judge dilemmas), to a sample of 70, fourth year medical students, from a Portuguese medical school. The questionnaire was applied at the beginning and end of a bioethics course, with a 3 month time interval. For this study the opinion scores were analyzed and described using the mean and standard deviation. The comparison of these scores, at both times, were performed using t-tests for paired samples. A significance level of 5% was used. For students who were neutral in the first application, the majority went on to agree or disagree with the performance of the dilemma character, ultimately showing less indecision at the end of bioethics course. The results suggest that, after the bioethics course, students have lower indecision, however the changes were very tenuous. Bioethics education is important to promote more opportunities for reflection and discussion, to stimulate critical judgment, and the ability to make decisions by medical students. Further research could help to better understand this subject.Fundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaUniversity of PortoSão Paulo State UniversitySão Paulo State UniversityFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia: UIDB/4255/2020University of PortoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Martins, VeraSantos, CristinaRicou, MiguelBataglia, Patrícia [UNESP]Duarte, Ivone2022-04-28T19:47:49Z2022-04-28T19:47:49Z2021-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21582440211057118SAGE Open, v. 11, n. 4, 2021.2158-2440http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22297010.1177/215824402110571182-s2.0-85120444747Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengSAGE Openinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:47:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222970Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:21:46.851702Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bioethics Education on Medical Students: Opinions About Ethical Dilemmas
title Bioethics Education on Medical Students: Opinions About Ethical Dilemmas
spellingShingle Bioethics Education on Medical Students: Opinions About Ethical Dilemmas
Martins, Vera
bioethics
decision-making
medical students
moral development
opinion
teaching
title_short Bioethics Education on Medical Students: Opinions About Ethical Dilemmas
title_full Bioethics Education on Medical Students: Opinions About Ethical Dilemmas
title_fullStr Bioethics Education on Medical Students: Opinions About Ethical Dilemmas
title_full_unstemmed Bioethics Education on Medical Students: Opinions About Ethical Dilemmas
title_sort Bioethics Education on Medical Students: Opinions About Ethical Dilemmas
author Martins, Vera
author_facet Martins, Vera
Santos, Cristina
Ricou, Miguel
Bataglia, Patrícia [UNESP]
Duarte, Ivone
author_role author
author2 Santos, Cristina
Ricou, Miguel
Bataglia, Patrícia [UNESP]
Duarte, Ivone
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv University of Porto
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, Vera
Santos, Cristina
Ricou, Miguel
Bataglia, Patrícia [UNESP]
Duarte, Ivone
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bioethics
decision-making
medical students
moral development
opinion
teaching
topic bioethics
decision-making
medical students
moral development
opinion
teaching
description Medical education aims to train professionals who are capable of making extremely complex decisions. As part of the medical curriculum, bioethics education could have an important role in promoting moral development and decision-making in medical students. This study aims to determine if, after a Bioethics and Professional Deontology course, medical students would present a change of opinion on three ethical dilemmas. A quantitative and longitudinal study was developed by applying the MCTxt (Moral Competence Test extended), composed of three ethical dilemmas (Worker, doctor, and judge dilemmas), to a sample of 70, fourth year medical students, from a Portuguese medical school. The questionnaire was applied at the beginning and end of a bioethics course, with a 3 month time interval. For this study the opinion scores were analyzed and described using the mean and standard deviation. The comparison of these scores, at both times, were performed using t-tests for paired samples. A significance level of 5% was used. For students who were neutral in the first application, the majority went on to agree or disagree with the performance of the dilemma character, ultimately showing less indecision at the end of bioethics course. The results suggest that, after the bioethics course, students have lower indecision, however the changes were very tenuous. Bioethics education is important to promote more opportunities for reflection and discussion, to stimulate critical judgment, and the ability to make decisions by medical students. Further research could help to better understand this subject.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-01
2022-04-28T19:47:49Z
2022-04-28T19:47:49Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21582440211057118
SAGE Open, v. 11, n. 4, 2021.
2158-2440
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222970
10.1177/21582440211057118
2-s2.0-85120444747
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21582440211057118
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222970
identifier_str_mv SAGE Open, v. 11, n. 4, 2021.
2158-2440
10.1177/21582440211057118
2-s2.0-85120444747
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Open
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129510315393024