Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Catanoze, Isabela A. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Souza, Heloisa S. de, Araujo, Renan C., Limirio, Joao Pedro J. D. O., Duque, Cristiane, Santos, Paulo H. dos, Pesqueira, Aldieris A., Guiotti, Aimee M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2275Catanoze09
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218524
Resumo: Purpose: To evaluate the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) on lithium disilicate ceramics, submitted to different intraoral polishing protocols, and the degree of surface smoothness obtained. Materials and Methods: Fifty lithium disilicate specimens were divided into 5 groups (n=10): G1-Glaze Group (positive control); G2-Glaze Group + Wear + Glaze; G3-Wear Group (negative control); G4-Ceramiste Wear Group; G5-Optrafine Wear Group. Surface roughness (Ra -mu m) was evaluated and the surface characteristics were assessed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM); to assess S. mutans biofilm, the number of cultured cells was evaluated by counting colony-forming units (CFU/mL). The data underwent one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (P<.05). Results: There was a significant difference in the surface roughness of all groups compared with G3. There was no significant difference between the G4 and G5 groups that received polishing. G1 group had the lowest mean roughness values. There was a difference in Log values (CFU/mL) between the G3 group and the groups that received glaze (G1 and G2). The G3 group had the highest adhesion of S. mutans (4.53 Log). Conclusion: The most effective polishing protocol after wear is glazing, presenting the lowest roughness and CFU/mL values.
id UNSP_84141f2bcbce16e46397f2057eae2d10
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/218524
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral PolishingCeramicsBiofilmsDental PolishingRoughness SurfacePurpose: To evaluate the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) on lithium disilicate ceramics, submitted to different intraoral polishing protocols, and the degree of surface smoothness obtained. Materials and Methods: Fifty lithium disilicate specimens were divided into 5 groups (n=10): G1-Glaze Group (positive control); G2-Glaze Group + Wear + Glaze; G3-Wear Group (negative control); G4-Ceramiste Wear Group; G5-Optrafine Wear Group. Surface roughness (Ra -mu m) was evaluated and the surface characteristics were assessed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM); to assess S. mutans biofilm, the number of cultured cells was evaluated by counting colony-forming units (CFU/mL). The data underwent one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (P<.05). Results: There was a significant difference in the surface roughness of all groups compared with G3. There was no significant difference between the G4 and G5 groups that received polishing. G1 group had the lowest mean roughness values. There was a difference in Log values (CFU/mL) between the G3 group and the groups that received glaze (G1 and G2). The G3 group had the highest adhesion of S. mutans (4.53 Log). Conclusion: The most effective polishing protocol after wear is glazing, presenting the lowest roughness and CFU/mL values.Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Den, Aracatuba, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Den, Aracatuba, SP, BrazilDennis Barber LtdUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Catanoze, Isabela A. [UNESP]Souza, Heloisa S. deAraujo, Renan C.Limirio, Joao Pedro J. D. O.Duque, CristianeSantos, Paulo H. dosPesqueira, Aldieris A.Guiotti, Aimee M.2022-04-28T17:21:28Z2022-04-28T17:21:28Z2021-11-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article9http://dx.doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2275Catanoze09European Journal Of Prosthodontics And Restorative Dentistry. Lowestoft: Dennis Barber Ltd, 9 p., 2021.0965-7452http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21852410.1922/EJPRD_2275Catanoze09WOS:000751972900001Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEuropean Journal Of Prosthodontics And Restorative Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T17:21:28Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/218524Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:14:52.146973Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing
title Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing
spellingShingle Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing
Catanoze, Isabela A. [UNESP]
Ceramics
Biofilms
Dental Polishing
Roughness Surface
title_short Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing
title_full Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing
title_fullStr Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing
title_sort Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing
author Catanoze, Isabela A. [UNESP]
author_facet Catanoze, Isabela A. [UNESP]
Souza, Heloisa S. de
Araujo, Renan C.
Limirio, Joao Pedro J. D. O.
Duque, Cristiane
Santos, Paulo H. dos
Pesqueira, Aldieris A.
Guiotti, Aimee M.
author_role author
author2 Souza, Heloisa S. de
Araujo, Renan C.
Limirio, Joao Pedro J. D. O.
Duque, Cristiane
Santos, Paulo H. dos
Pesqueira, Aldieris A.
Guiotti, Aimee M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Catanoze, Isabela A. [UNESP]
Souza, Heloisa S. de
Araujo, Renan C.
Limirio, Joao Pedro J. D. O.
Duque, Cristiane
Santos, Paulo H. dos
Pesqueira, Aldieris A.
Guiotti, Aimee M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ceramics
Biofilms
Dental Polishing
Roughness Surface
topic Ceramics
Biofilms
Dental Polishing
Roughness Surface
description Purpose: To evaluate the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) on lithium disilicate ceramics, submitted to different intraoral polishing protocols, and the degree of surface smoothness obtained. Materials and Methods: Fifty lithium disilicate specimens were divided into 5 groups (n=10): G1-Glaze Group (positive control); G2-Glaze Group + Wear + Glaze; G3-Wear Group (negative control); G4-Ceramiste Wear Group; G5-Optrafine Wear Group. Surface roughness (Ra -mu m) was evaluated and the surface characteristics were assessed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM); to assess S. mutans biofilm, the number of cultured cells was evaluated by counting colony-forming units (CFU/mL). The data underwent one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (P<.05). Results: There was a significant difference in the surface roughness of all groups compared with G3. There was no significant difference between the G4 and G5 groups that received polishing. G1 group had the lowest mean roughness values. There was a difference in Log values (CFU/mL) between the G3 group and the groups that received glaze (G1 and G2). The G3 group had the highest adhesion of S. mutans (4.53 Log). Conclusion: The most effective polishing protocol after wear is glazing, presenting the lowest roughness and CFU/mL values.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-16
2022-04-28T17:21:28Z
2022-04-28T17:21:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2275Catanoze09
European Journal Of Prosthodontics And Restorative Dentistry. Lowestoft: Dennis Barber Ltd, 9 p., 2021.
0965-7452
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218524
10.1922/EJPRD_2275Catanoze09
WOS:000751972900001
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2275Catanoze09
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218524
identifier_str_mv European Journal Of Prosthodontics And Restorative Dentistry. Lowestoft: Dennis Barber Ltd, 9 p., 2021.
0965-7452
10.1922/EJPRD_2275Catanoze09
WOS:000751972900001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv European Journal Of Prosthodontics And Restorative Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 9
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dennis Barber Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dennis Barber Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128910845542400