Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2275Catanoze09 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218524 |
Resumo: | Purpose: To evaluate the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) on lithium disilicate ceramics, submitted to different intraoral polishing protocols, and the degree of surface smoothness obtained. Materials and Methods: Fifty lithium disilicate specimens were divided into 5 groups (n=10): G1-Glaze Group (positive control); G2-Glaze Group + Wear + Glaze; G3-Wear Group (negative control); G4-Ceramiste Wear Group; G5-Optrafine Wear Group. Surface roughness (Ra -mu m) was evaluated and the surface characteristics were assessed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM); to assess S. mutans biofilm, the number of cultured cells was evaluated by counting colony-forming units (CFU/mL). The data underwent one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (P<.05). Results: There was a significant difference in the surface roughness of all groups compared with G3. There was no significant difference between the G4 and G5 groups that received polishing. G1 group had the lowest mean roughness values. There was a difference in Log values (CFU/mL) between the G3 group and the groups that received glaze (G1 and G2). The G3 group had the highest adhesion of S. mutans (4.53 Log). Conclusion: The most effective polishing protocol after wear is glazing, presenting the lowest roughness and CFU/mL values. |
id |
UNSP_84141f2bcbce16e46397f2057eae2d10 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/218524 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral PolishingCeramicsBiofilmsDental PolishingRoughness SurfacePurpose: To evaluate the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) on lithium disilicate ceramics, submitted to different intraoral polishing protocols, and the degree of surface smoothness obtained. Materials and Methods: Fifty lithium disilicate specimens were divided into 5 groups (n=10): G1-Glaze Group (positive control); G2-Glaze Group + Wear + Glaze; G3-Wear Group (negative control); G4-Ceramiste Wear Group; G5-Optrafine Wear Group. Surface roughness (Ra -mu m) was evaluated and the surface characteristics were assessed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM); to assess S. mutans biofilm, the number of cultured cells was evaluated by counting colony-forming units (CFU/mL). The data underwent one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (P<.05). Results: There was a significant difference in the surface roughness of all groups compared with G3. There was no significant difference between the G4 and G5 groups that received polishing. G1 group had the lowest mean roughness values. There was a difference in Log values (CFU/mL) between the G3 group and the groups that received glaze (G1 and G2). The G3 group had the highest adhesion of S. mutans (4.53 Log). Conclusion: The most effective polishing protocol after wear is glazing, presenting the lowest roughness and CFU/mL values.Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Den, Aracatuba, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Den, Aracatuba, SP, BrazilDennis Barber LtdUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Catanoze, Isabela A. [UNESP]Souza, Heloisa S. deAraujo, Renan C.Limirio, Joao Pedro J. D. O.Duque, CristianeSantos, Paulo H. dosPesqueira, Aldieris A.Guiotti, Aimee M.2022-04-28T17:21:28Z2022-04-28T17:21:28Z2021-11-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article9http://dx.doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2275Catanoze09European Journal Of Prosthodontics And Restorative Dentistry. Lowestoft: Dennis Barber Ltd, 9 p., 2021.0965-7452http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21852410.1922/EJPRD_2275Catanoze09WOS:000751972900001Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEuropean Journal Of Prosthodontics And Restorative Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T17:21:28Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/218524Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:14:52.146973Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing |
title |
Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing Catanoze, Isabela A. [UNESP] Ceramics Biofilms Dental Polishing Roughness Surface |
title_short |
Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing |
title_full |
Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing |
title_sort |
Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing |
author |
Catanoze, Isabela A. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Catanoze, Isabela A. [UNESP] Souza, Heloisa S. de Araujo, Renan C. Limirio, Joao Pedro J. D. O. Duque, Cristiane Santos, Paulo H. dos Pesqueira, Aldieris A. Guiotti, Aimee M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza, Heloisa S. de Araujo, Renan C. Limirio, Joao Pedro J. D. O. Duque, Cristiane Santos, Paulo H. dos Pesqueira, Aldieris A. Guiotti, Aimee M. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Catanoze, Isabela A. [UNESP] Souza, Heloisa S. de Araujo, Renan C. Limirio, Joao Pedro J. D. O. Duque, Cristiane Santos, Paulo H. dos Pesqueira, Aldieris A. Guiotti, Aimee M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ceramics Biofilms Dental Polishing Roughness Surface |
topic |
Ceramics Biofilms Dental Polishing Roughness Surface |
description |
Purpose: To evaluate the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) on lithium disilicate ceramics, submitted to different intraoral polishing protocols, and the degree of surface smoothness obtained. Materials and Methods: Fifty lithium disilicate specimens were divided into 5 groups (n=10): G1-Glaze Group (positive control); G2-Glaze Group + Wear + Glaze; G3-Wear Group (negative control); G4-Ceramiste Wear Group; G5-Optrafine Wear Group. Surface roughness (Ra -mu m) was evaluated and the surface characteristics were assessed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM); to assess S. mutans biofilm, the number of cultured cells was evaluated by counting colony-forming units (CFU/mL). The data underwent one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (P<.05). Results: There was a significant difference in the surface roughness of all groups compared with G3. There was no significant difference between the G4 and G5 groups that received polishing. G1 group had the lowest mean roughness values. There was a difference in Log values (CFU/mL) between the G3 group and the groups that received glaze (G1 and G2). The G3 group had the highest adhesion of S. mutans (4.53 Log). Conclusion: The most effective polishing protocol after wear is glazing, presenting the lowest roughness and CFU/mL values. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-16 2022-04-28T17:21:28Z 2022-04-28T17:21:28Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2275Catanoze09 European Journal Of Prosthodontics And Restorative Dentistry. Lowestoft: Dennis Barber Ltd, 9 p., 2021. 0965-7452 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218524 10.1922/EJPRD_2275Catanoze09 WOS:000751972900001 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2275Catanoze09 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218524 |
identifier_str_mv |
European Journal Of Prosthodontics And Restorative Dentistry. Lowestoft: Dennis Barber Ltd, 9 p., 2021. 0965-7452 10.1922/EJPRD_2275Catanoze09 WOS:000751972900001 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
European Journal Of Prosthodontics And Restorative Dentistry |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
9 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dennis Barber Ltd |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dennis Barber Ltd |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128910845542400 |