COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo de conferência |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/247035 |
Resumo: | In accordance to CDIO, active learning methods engage students directly in thinking and, currently, the application of innovative learning tools in the engineering courses are becoming mandatory. The selection of the most appropriate methodology for each course is a challenge. Once CDIO adopts that assessment of student learning is the measure of the extent to which student achieves specified learning, the outcomes from the assessment can be adopted as one indicator giving the direction to the better choice of methodology. In this research, three innovative methodologies were applied with a group of 81 undergraduates belonged to an industrial engineering course. During one semester were collected the outcomes data of the assessment applying to the group using: Team-Based Assessment, Peer Assessment and Project-Based Assessment. The data were treated using ANOVA, Tuckey multiple comparisons and the paired t-test in order to validate the hypothesis that the average grade of the group after each type of assessment would be the same considering the three methodologies. The findings were discussed and presented. The work was concluded and opportunities for further researches were suggested. |
id |
UNSP_85ea754c271da8924bde2cbdcb17f5dd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/247035 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERINGAssessmentindustrial engineering coursepeer assessmentproject-based learningstandards: 7, 8, 11team assessmentIn accordance to CDIO, active learning methods engage students directly in thinking and, currently, the application of innovative learning tools in the engineering courses are becoming mandatory. The selection of the most appropriate methodology for each course is a challenge. Once CDIO adopts that assessment of student learning is the measure of the extent to which student achieves specified learning, the outcomes from the assessment can be adopted as one indicator giving the direction to the better choice of methodology. In this research, three innovative methodologies were applied with a group of 81 undergraduates belonged to an industrial engineering course. During one semester were collected the outcomes data of the assessment applying to the group using: Team-Based Assessment, Peer Assessment and Project-Based Assessment. The data were treated using ANOVA, Tuckey multiple comparisons and the paired t-test in order to validate the hypothesis that the average grade of the group after each type of assessment would be the same considering the three methodologies. The findings were discussed and presented. The work was concluded and opportunities for further researches were suggested.University of the State of São Paulo Department of Industrial Engineering Faculty of Engineering of GuaratinguetaFaculty of Human Science of Cruzeiro Industrial EngineeringInstituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto ISEP-P.PORTO ISRC - Interdisciplinary Studies Research CenterUniversity of São Paulo School of Engineering of LorenaFaculty of Engineering of GuaratinguetaIndustrial EngineeringISRC - Interdisciplinary Studies Research CenterUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)de Carvalho, Cleginaldo PereiraFerreira, Eduarda PintoSilva, Messias BorgesAihara, Beatriz Naomi2023-07-29T12:57:17Z2023-07-29T12:57:17Z2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject212-220Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference, p. 212-220.2002-1593http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2470352-s2.0-85150712670Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengProceedings of the International CDIO Conferenceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-29T12:57:17Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/247035Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:50:17.608556Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING |
title |
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING |
spellingShingle |
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING de Carvalho, Cleginaldo Pereira Assessment industrial engineering course peer assessment project-based learning standards: 7, 8, 11 team assessment |
title_short |
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING |
title_full |
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING |
title_fullStr |
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING |
title_full_unstemmed |
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING |
title_sort |
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING |
author |
de Carvalho, Cleginaldo Pereira |
author_facet |
de Carvalho, Cleginaldo Pereira Ferreira, Eduarda Pinto Silva, Messias Borges Aihara, Beatriz Naomi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira, Eduarda Pinto Silva, Messias Borges Aihara, Beatriz Naomi |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculty of Engineering of Guaratingueta Industrial Engineering ISRC - Interdisciplinary Studies Research Center Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Carvalho, Cleginaldo Pereira Ferreira, Eduarda Pinto Silva, Messias Borges Aihara, Beatriz Naomi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Assessment industrial engineering course peer assessment project-based learning standards: 7, 8, 11 team assessment |
topic |
Assessment industrial engineering course peer assessment project-based learning standards: 7, 8, 11 team assessment |
description |
In accordance to CDIO, active learning methods engage students directly in thinking and, currently, the application of innovative learning tools in the engineering courses are becoming mandatory. The selection of the most appropriate methodology for each course is a challenge. Once CDIO adopts that assessment of student learning is the measure of the extent to which student achieves specified learning, the outcomes from the assessment can be adopted as one indicator giving the direction to the better choice of methodology. In this research, three innovative methodologies were applied with a group of 81 undergraduates belonged to an industrial engineering course. During one semester were collected the outcomes data of the assessment applying to the group using: Team-Based Assessment, Peer Assessment and Project-Based Assessment. The data were treated using ANOVA, Tuckey multiple comparisons and the paired t-test in order to validate the hypothesis that the average grade of the group after each type of assessment would be the same considering the three methodologies. The findings were discussed and presented. The work was concluded and opportunities for further researches were suggested. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 2023-07-29T12:57:17Z 2023-07-29T12:57:17Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference, p. 212-220. 2002-1593 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/247035 2-s2.0-85150712670 |
identifier_str_mv |
Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference, p. 212-220. 2002-1593 2-s2.0-85150712670 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/247035 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
212-220 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128571714043904 |