COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Carvalho, Cleginaldo Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Ferreira, Eduarda Pinto, Silva, Messias Borges, Aihara, Beatriz Naomi
Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/247035
Resumo: In accordance to CDIO, active learning methods engage students directly in thinking and, currently, the application of innovative learning tools in the engineering courses are becoming mandatory. The selection of the most appropriate methodology for each course is a challenge. Once CDIO adopts that assessment of student learning is the measure of the extent to which student achieves specified learning, the outcomes from the assessment can be adopted as one indicator giving the direction to the better choice of methodology. In this research, three innovative methodologies were applied with a group of 81 undergraduates belonged to an industrial engineering course. During one semester were collected the outcomes data of the assessment applying to the group using: Team-Based Assessment, Peer Assessment and Project-Based Assessment. The data were treated using ANOVA, Tuckey multiple comparisons and the paired t-test in order to validate the hypothesis that the average grade of the group after each type of assessment would be the same considering the three methodologies. The findings were discussed and presented. The work was concluded and opportunities for further researches were suggested.
id UNSP_85ea754c271da8924bde2cbdcb17f5dd
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/247035
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERINGAssessmentindustrial engineering coursepeer assessmentproject-based learningstandards: 7, 8, 11team assessmentIn accordance to CDIO, active learning methods engage students directly in thinking and, currently, the application of innovative learning tools in the engineering courses are becoming mandatory. The selection of the most appropriate methodology for each course is a challenge. Once CDIO adopts that assessment of student learning is the measure of the extent to which student achieves specified learning, the outcomes from the assessment can be adopted as one indicator giving the direction to the better choice of methodology. In this research, three innovative methodologies were applied with a group of 81 undergraduates belonged to an industrial engineering course. During one semester were collected the outcomes data of the assessment applying to the group using: Team-Based Assessment, Peer Assessment and Project-Based Assessment. The data were treated using ANOVA, Tuckey multiple comparisons and the paired t-test in order to validate the hypothesis that the average grade of the group after each type of assessment would be the same considering the three methodologies. The findings were discussed and presented. The work was concluded and opportunities for further researches were suggested.University of the State of São Paulo Department of Industrial Engineering Faculty of Engineering of GuaratinguetaFaculty of Human Science of Cruzeiro Industrial EngineeringInstituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto ISEP-P.PORTO ISRC - Interdisciplinary Studies Research CenterUniversity of São Paulo School of Engineering of LorenaFaculty of Engineering of GuaratinguetaIndustrial EngineeringISRC - Interdisciplinary Studies Research CenterUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)de Carvalho, Cleginaldo PereiraFerreira, Eduarda PintoSilva, Messias BorgesAihara, Beatriz Naomi2023-07-29T12:57:17Z2023-07-29T12:57:17Z2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject212-220Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference, p. 212-220.2002-1593http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2470352-s2.0-85150712670Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengProceedings of the International CDIO Conferenceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-29T12:57:17Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/247035Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:50:17.608556Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
title COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
spellingShingle COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
de Carvalho, Cleginaldo Pereira
Assessment
industrial engineering course
peer assessment
project-based learning
standards: 7, 8, 11
team assessment
title_short COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
title_full COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
title_sort COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTIVE LEARNING IN A COURSE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
author de Carvalho, Cleginaldo Pereira
author_facet de Carvalho, Cleginaldo Pereira
Ferreira, Eduarda Pinto
Silva, Messias Borges
Aihara, Beatriz Naomi
author_role author
author2 Ferreira, Eduarda Pinto
Silva, Messias Borges
Aihara, Beatriz Naomi
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Faculty of Engineering of Guaratingueta
Industrial Engineering
ISRC - Interdisciplinary Studies Research Center
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Carvalho, Cleginaldo Pereira
Ferreira, Eduarda Pinto
Silva, Messias Borges
Aihara, Beatriz Naomi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Assessment
industrial engineering course
peer assessment
project-based learning
standards: 7, 8, 11
team assessment
topic Assessment
industrial engineering course
peer assessment
project-based learning
standards: 7, 8, 11
team assessment
description In accordance to CDIO, active learning methods engage students directly in thinking and, currently, the application of innovative learning tools in the engineering courses are becoming mandatory. The selection of the most appropriate methodology for each course is a challenge. Once CDIO adopts that assessment of student learning is the measure of the extent to which student achieves specified learning, the outcomes from the assessment can be adopted as one indicator giving the direction to the better choice of methodology. In this research, three innovative methodologies were applied with a group of 81 undergraduates belonged to an industrial engineering course. During one semester were collected the outcomes data of the assessment applying to the group using: Team-Based Assessment, Peer Assessment and Project-Based Assessment. The data were treated using ANOVA, Tuckey multiple comparisons and the paired t-test in order to validate the hypothesis that the average grade of the group after each type of assessment would be the same considering the three methodologies. The findings were discussed and presented. The work was concluded and opportunities for further researches were suggested.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
2023-07-29T12:57:17Z
2023-07-29T12:57:17Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference, p. 212-220.
2002-1593
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/247035
2-s2.0-85150712670
identifier_str_mv Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference, p. 212-220.
2002-1593
2-s2.0-85150712670
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/247035
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 212-220
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128571714043904