Assessment of patient and dentist preference between conventional and digital diagnostic waxing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218802 |
Resumo: | Patient expectations for rehabilitations of a high esthetic standard as well as the demand for fast but efficient care have provided new work perspectives in dentistry. Dentists also have to choose between conventional and digital workflows. The aim of the present randomized restorative trial was to compare diagnostic waxing (DW) performed conventionally with its digital counterpart and to assess the two approaches from the point of view of both patient and dentist. Twenty patients with esthetic complaints were selected to undergo molding processes to obtain conventional study models on the one hand, and intraoral scanning to obtain virtual models on the other. Both the 2D planning and 3D virtual models were sent to the laboratory for the performance of DW. The restorative trial was evaluated by one evaluator dentist, while patient opinion was determined through customized questionnaires. The results show that although 80% of patients rated the digital method to be more convenient in terms of execution time and comfort and indicated that scanning was the most reliable way to obtain an impression, 65% chose the conventional DW for their esthetic restoration after the mock-up tests were performed and analyzed. The evaluating dentist conventional preferred the DW technique in 50% of cases assessed. The conclusion is that although digital technology has its advantages, the final esthetic result does not always meet the expectations and demands of patients and dentists. |
id |
UNSP_861ba0639aae34bdfa65b635e91d2fff |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/218802 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Assessment of patient and dentist preference between conventional and digital diagnostic waxingPatient expectations for rehabilitations of a high esthetic standard as well as the demand for fast but efficient care have provided new work perspectives in dentistry. Dentists also have to choose between conventional and digital workflows. The aim of the present randomized restorative trial was to compare diagnostic waxing (DW) performed conventionally with its digital counterpart and to assess the two approaches from the point of view of both patient and dentist. Twenty patients with esthetic complaints were selected to undergo molding processes to obtain conventional study models on the one hand, and intraoral scanning to obtain virtual models on the other. Both the 2D planning and 3D virtual models were sent to the laboratory for the performance of DW. The restorative trial was evaluated by one evaluator dentist, while patient opinion was determined through customized questionnaires. The results show that although 80% of patients rated the digital method to be more convenient in terms of execution time and comfort and indicated that scanning was the most reliable way to obtain an impression, 65% chose the conventional DW for their esthetic restoration after the mock-up tests were performed and analyzed. The evaluating dentist conventional preferred the DW technique in 50% of cases assessed. The conclusion is that although digital technology has its advantages, the final esthetic result does not always meet the expectations and demands of patients and dentists.Univ Estadual Paulista, Profess Masters Degree Program, Sao Jose Dos Campos, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Dent Prostheses Doctoral Program, Sao Jose Dos Campos, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Sao Jose Dos Campos, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Profess Masters Degree Program, Sao Jose Dos Campos, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Dent Prostheses Doctoral Program, Sao Jose Dos Campos, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Sao Jose Dos Campos, BrazilQuintessence Publishing Co IncUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Mocelin, Roberta de Cristina [UNESP]Penteado, Marcela Moreira [UNESP]Pierre, Fernanda Zapater [UNESP]Varela Saraiva, Antonio Carlos [UNESP]Uemura, Eduardo Shigueyuki [UNESP]Ferraz da Silva, Joao Mauricio [UNESP]2022-04-28T17:23:10Z2022-04-28T17:23:10Z2021-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article300-309International Journal Of Esthetic Dentistry. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 16, n. 3, p. 300-309, 2021.2198-591Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/218802WOS:000753395300005Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal Of Esthetic Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T17:23:10Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/218802Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T17:23:10Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assessment of patient and dentist preference between conventional and digital diagnostic waxing |
title |
Assessment of patient and dentist preference between conventional and digital diagnostic waxing |
spellingShingle |
Assessment of patient and dentist preference between conventional and digital diagnostic waxing Mocelin, Roberta de Cristina [UNESP] |
title_short |
Assessment of patient and dentist preference between conventional and digital diagnostic waxing |
title_full |
Assessment of patient and dentist preference between conventional and digital diagnostic waxing |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of patient and dentist preference between conventional and digital diagnostic waxing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of patient and dentist preference between conventional and digital diagnostic waxing |
title_sort |
Assessment of patient and dentist preference between conventional and digital diagnostic waxing |
author |
Mocelin, Roberta de Cristina [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Mocelin, Roberta de Cristina [UNESP] Penteado, Marcela Moreira [UNESP] Pierre, Fernanda Zapater [UNESP] Varela Saraiva, Antonio Carlos [UNESP] Uemura, Eduardo Shigueyuki [UNESP] Ferraz da Silva, Joao Mauricio [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Penteado, Marcela Moreira [UNESP] Pierre, Fernanda Zapater [UNESP] Varela Saraiva, Antonio Carlos [UNESP] Uemura, Eduardo Shigueyuki [UNESP] Ferraz da Silva, Joao Mauricio [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mocelin, Roberta de Cristina [UNESP] Penteado, Marcela Moreira [UNESP] Pierre, Fernanda Zapater [UNESP] Varela Saraiva, Antonio Carlos [UNESP] Uemura, Eduardo Shigueyuki [UNESP] Ferraz da Silva, Joao Mauricio [UNESP] |
description |
Patient expectations for rehabilitations of a high esthetic standard as well as the demand for fast but efficient care have provided new work perspectives in dentistry. Dentists also have to choose between conventional and digital workflows. The aim of the present randomized restorative trial was to compare diagnostic waxing (DW) performed conventionally with its digital counterpart and to assess the two approaches from the point of view of both patient and dentist. Twenty patients with esthetic complaints were selected to undergo molding processes to obtain conventional study models on the one hand, and intraoral scanning to obtain virtual models on the other. Both the 2D planning and 3D virtual models were sent to the laboratory for the performance of DW. The restorative trial was evaluated by one evaluator dentist, while patient opinion was determined through customized questionnaires. The results show that although 80% of patients rated the digital method to be more convenient in terms of execution time and comfort and indicated that scanning was the most reliable way to obtain an impression, 65% chose the conventional DW for their esthetic restoration after the mock-up tests were performed and analyzed. The evaluating dentist conventional preferred the DW technique in 50% of cases assessed. The conclusion is that although digital technology has its advantages, the final esthetic result does not always meet the expectations and demands of patients and dentists. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-01 2022-04-28T17:23:10Z 2022-04-28T17:23:10Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
International Journal Of Esthetic Dentistry. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 16, n. 3, p. 300-309, 2021. 2198-591X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218802 WOS:000753395300005 |
identifier_str_mv |
International Journal Of Esthetic Dentistry. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 16, n. 3, p. 300-309, 2021. 2198-591X WOS:000753395300005 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218802 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal Of Esthetic Dentistry |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
300-309 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Quintessence Publishing Co Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Quintessence Publishing Co Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799965101544964096 |