Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) and QuEChERS evaluation for the analysis of antibiotics in agricultural soils

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Silva, Josiel José [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: da Silva, Bianca Ferreira [UNESP], Stradiotto, Nelson Ramos [UNESP], Petrovic, Mira, Gago-Ferrero, Pablo, Gros, Meritxell
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.101171
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208245
Resumo: Vinasse, a liquid waste which originates from the production of ethanol fuel from sugarcane, has been widely used as soil amendment in Brazil. An important concern that arises from vinasse reuse is the dissemination of antibiotics to the environment through crop soils. This work evaluated the performance of Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) and QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe) to extract several multiple-class antibiotics, such as cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, ionophores, lincosamides, macrolides, quinolones, streptogramin, sulfonamides, tetracyclines and others, from agricultural soils. The performance of several parameters was evaluated for both PLE and QuEChERS, such as the extraction temperature (for PLE), solvents composition, pH and the addition of EDTA. Both methods were able to extract most target antibiotics. However, QuEChERS showed higher recoveries for macrolides and nitroimidazoles, while PLE was more suitable for fluoroquinolones and ionophores (i.e. monensin). The use of citrate-phosphate buffer at pH 7.0, in combination with methanol for PLE and with acetonitrile for QuEChERS, provided the highest antibiotic recoveries for both methods. The use of EDTA did not increase antibiotic recovery rates for QuEChERS, while the temperature had almost no influence on the extraction efficiency in PLE. • Citrate-phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 provided higher antibiotic recoveries for QuEChERS and PLE. • The combination buffer-methanol provided higher recoveries for PLE. • QuEChERS and PLE methods were able to extract most of the target antibiotics.
id UNSP_8967a7c1d186375af81e65f1a686072c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208245
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) and QuEChERS evaluation for the analysis of antibiotics in agricultural soilsAgricultural soilAntibiotic Soil ExtractionAntibioticsPressurized Liquid ExtractionQuEChERSVinasseVinasse, a liquid waste which originates from the production of ethanol fuel from sugarcane, has been widely used as soil amendment in Brazil. An important concern that arises from vinasse reuse is the dissemination of antibiotics to the environment through crop soils. This work evaluated the performance of Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) and QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe) to extract several multiple-class antibiotics, such as cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, ionophores, lincosamides, macrolides, quinolones, streptogramin, sulfonamides, tetracyclines and others, from agricultural soils. The performance of several parameters was evaluated for both PLE and QuEChERS, such as the extraction temperature (for PLE), solvents composition, pH and the addition of EDTA. Both methods were able to extract most target antibiotics. However, QuEChERS showed higher recoveries for macrolides and nitroimidazoles, while PLE was more suitable for fluoroquinolones and ionophores (i.e. monensin). The use of citrate-phosphate buffer at pH 7.0, in combination with methanol for PLE and with acetonitrile for QuEChERS, provided the highest antibiotic recoveries for both methods. The use of EDTA did not increase antibiotic recovery rates for QuEChERS, while the temperature had almost no influence on the extraction efficiency in PLE. • Citrate-phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 provided higher antibiotic recoveries for QuEChERS and PLE. • The combination buffer-methanol provided higher recoveries for PLE. • QuEChERS and PLE methods were able to extract most of the target antibiotics.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Institute of Chemistry São Paulo State University (UNESP)Bioenergy Research Institute (IPBEN) São Paulo State University (UNESP)Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA)Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA), Emili Grahit 101University of GironaInstitute of Chemistry São Paulo State University (UNESP)Bioenergy Research Institute (IPBEN) São Paulo State University (UNESP)FAPESP: 2016/06352-4FAPESP: 2018/15739-5Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA)Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA)University of Gironada Silva, Josiel José [UNESP]da Silva, Bianca Ferreira [UNESP]Stradiotto, Nelson Ramos [UNESP]Petrovic, MiraGago-Ferrero, PabloGros, Meritxell2021-06-25T11:08:50Z2021-06-25T11:08:50Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.101171MethodsX, v. 7.2215-0161http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20824510.1016/j.mex.2020.1011712-s2.0-85097680261Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengMethodsXinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T18:56:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208245Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:39:07.662515Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) and QuEChERS evaluation for the analysis of antibiotics in agricultural soils
title Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) and QuEChERS evaluation for the analysis of antibiotics in agricultural soils
spellingShingle Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) and QuEChERS evaluation for the analysis of antibiotics in agricultural soils
da Silva, Josiel José [UNESP]
Agricultural soil
Antibiotic Soil Extraction
Antibiotics
Pressurized Liquid Extraction
QuEChERS
Vinasse
title_short Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) and QuEChERS evaluation for the analysis of antibiotics in agricultural soils
title_full Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) and QuEChERS evaluation for the analysis of antibiotics in agricultural soils
title_fullStr Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) and QuEChERS evaluation for the analysis of antibiotics in agricultural soils
title_full_unstemmed Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) and QuEChERS evaluation for the analysis of antibiotics in agricultural soils
title_sort Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) and QuEChERS evaluation for the analysis of antibiotics in agricultural soils
author da Silva, Josiel José [UNESP]
author_facet da Silva, Josiel José [UNESP]
da Silva, Bianca Ferreira [UNESP]
Stradiotto, Nelson Ramos [UNESP]
Petrovic, Mira
Gago-Ferrero, Pablo
Gros, Meritxell
author_role author
author2 da Silva, Bianca Ferreira [UNESP]
Stradiotto, Nelson Ramos [UNESP]
Petrovic, Mira
Gago-Ferrero, Pablo
Gros, Meritxell
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA)
Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA)
University of Girona
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Silva, Josiel José [UNESP]
da Silva, Bianca Ferreira [UNESP]
Stradiotto, Nelson Ramos [UNESP]
Petrovic, Mira
Gago-Ferrero, Pablo
Gros, Meritxell
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agricultural soil
Antibiotic Soil Extraction
Antibiotics
Pressurized Liquid Extraction
QuEChERS
Vinasse
topic Agricultural soil
Antibiotic Soil Extraction
Antibiotics
Pressurized Liquid Extraction
QuEChERS
Vinasse
description Vinasse, a liquid waste which originates from the production of ethanol fuel from sugarcane, has been widely used as soil amendment in Brazil. An important concern that arises from vinasse reuse is the dissemination of antibiotics to the environment through crop soils. This work evaluated the performance of Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) and QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe) to extract several multiple-class antibiotics, such as cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, ionophores, lincosamides, macrolides, quinolones, streptogramin, sulfonamides, tetracyclines and others, from agricultural soils. The performance of several parameters was evaluated for both PLE and QuEChERS, such as the extraction temperature (for PLE), solvents composition, pH and the addition of EDTA. Both methods were able to extract most target antibiotics. However, QuEChERS showed higher recoveries for macrolides and nitroimidazoles, while PLE was more suitable for fluoroquinolones and ionophores (i.e. monensin). The use of citrate-phosphate buffer at pH 7.0, in combination with methanol for PLE and with acetonitrile for QuEChERS, provided the highest antibiotic recoveries for both methods. The use of EDTA did not increase antibiotic recovery rates for QuEChERS, while the temperature had almost no influence on the extraction efficiency in PLE. • Citrate-phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 provided higher antibiotic recoveries for QuEChERS and PLE. • The combination buffer-methanol provided higher recoveries for PLE. • QuEChERS and PLE methods were able to extract most of the target antibiotics.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
2021-06-25T11:08:50Z
2021-06-25T11:08:50Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.101171
MethodsX, v. 7.
2215-0161
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208245
10.1016/j.mex.2020.101171
2-s2.0-85097680261
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.101171
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208245
identifier_str_mv MethodsX, v. 7.
2215-0161
10.1016/j.mex.2020.101171
2-s2.0-85097680261
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv MethodsX
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128959993348096