Development Models for the Brazilian Countryside: Paradigmatic and Territorial Disputes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Bernardo Mancano [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0094582X15616117
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/165098
Resumo: Problems of land use and ownership result from the inequalities caused by the hegemonic form of capitalism, agribusiness. A possible alternative model has yet to be worked out, and there is a fundamental need to reflect on the struggle against the hegemony of capitalism and how to safeguard the interests of the peasantry. From this perspective, the agrarian question should be considered as a conflict between those favoring the interests of the peasantry and family farming and those favoring agribusiness. A paradigmatic debate about the roles of the Brazilian state, agribusiness, and the peasant movements in formulating public policy shows that the potential for the peasantry to grow food is threatened by the concentration of power, landownership, capital, technology, and wealth. Unless there is a change in the development model, the prospect is increasing inequality. The experiment with having two government ministries for agriculture is an important step in the shaping of policies to support family farming. Os problemas com uso e propriedade da terra sAo resultados das desigualdades causadas pelo modelo capitalista hegemonico denominado agronegocio. Um possivel modelo alternativo esta sendo gestado e ha necessidade de refletir sobre a luta contra a hegemonia do capitalismo e como salvaguardar os interesses dos camponeses. A partir desta perspectiva, a questAo agraria deve ser considerada como conflitualidade permanente entre os interesses dos camponeses ou agricultura familiar e os interesses do agronegocio. O debate paradigmatico contribui para compreender o papel do Estado brasileiro, do agronegocio e dos movimentos camponeses na formulacAo de politicas publicas. Tambem mostra que as possibilidades de criacAo de um modelo de desenvolvimento do campesinato esta ameacado pela concentracAo de poder, propriedade da terra, capital, tecnologia e riqueza nas mAos do agronegocio. Se nAo houver uma mudanca com a criacAo de um modelo de desenvolvimento voltado aos interesses da agricultura camponesa, a perspectiva e de aumento da desigualdade. A experiencia de ter dois ministerios para a agricultura e condicAo fundamental na definicAo de politicas de apoio a agricultura camponesa e familiar.
id UNSP_89e4bae5fa7ae44433257d4f56d61e43
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/165098
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Development Models for the Brazilian Countryside: Paradigmatic and Territorial DisputesPeasantryAgribusinessParadigmTerritoryDevelopmentProblems of land use and ownership result from the inequalities caused by the hegemonic form of capitalism, agribusiness. A possible alternative model has yet to be worked out, and there is a fundamental need to reflect on the struggle against the hegemony of capitalism and how to safeguard the interests of the peasantry. From this perspective, the agrarian question should be considered as a conflict between those favoring the interests of the peasantry and family farming and those favoring agribusiness. A paradigmatic debate about the roles of the Brazilian state, agribusiness, and the peasant movements in formulating public policy shows that the potential for the peasantry to grow food is threatened by the concentration of power, landownership, capital, technology, and wealth. Unless there is a change in the development model, the prospect is increasing inequality. The experiment with having two government ministries for agriculture is an important step in the shaping of policies to support family farming. Os problemas com uso e propriedade da terra sAo resultados das desigualdades causadas pelo modelo capitalista hegemonico denominado agronegocio. Um possivel modelo alternativo esta sendo gestado e ha necessidade de refletir sobre a luta contra a hegemonia do capitalismo e como salvaguardar os interesses dos camponeses. A partir desta perspectiva, a questAo agraria deve ser considerada como conflitualidade permanente entre os interesses dos camponeses ou agricultura familiar e os interesses do agronegocio. O debate paradigmatico contribui para compreender o papel do Estado brasileiro, do agronegocio e dos movimentos camponeses na formulacAo de politicas publicas. Tambem mostra que as possibilidades de criacAo de um modelo de desenvolvimento do campesinato esta ameacado pela concentracAo de poder, propriedade da terra, capital, tecnologia e riqueza nas mAos do agronegocio. Se nAo houver uma mudanca com a criacAo de um modelo de desenvolvimento voltado aos interesses da agricultura camponesa, a perspectiva e de aumento da desigualdade. A experiencia de ter dois ministerios para a agricultura e condicAo fundamental na definicAo de politicas de apoio a agricultura camponesa e familiar.Univ Estadual Paulista, Grad Program Geog, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Sao Paulo, BrazilUNESCO, Chair Territorial Dev & Educ Countryside, Paris, FranceColumbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USAUniv Estadual Paulista, Grad Program Geog, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Sao Paulo, BrazilSage Publications IncUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)UNESCOColumbia UnivFernandes, Bernardo Mancano [UNESP]2018-11-27T10:34:24Z2018-11-27T10:34:24Z2016-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article48-59application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0094582X15616117Latin American Perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc, v. 43, n. 2, p. 48-59, 2016.0094-582Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/16509810.1177/0094582X15616117WOS:000371614000003WOS000371614000003.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengLatin American Perspectivesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-19T13:48:22Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/165098Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:54:12.066551Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Development Models for the Brazilian Countryside: Paradigmatic and Territorial Disputes
title Development Models for the Brazilian Countryside: Paradigmatic and Territorial Disputes
spellingShingle Development Models for the Brazilian Countryside: Paradigmatic and Territorial Disputes
Fernandes, Bernardo Mancano [UNESP]
Peasantry
Agribusiness
Paradigm
Territory
Development
title_short Development Models for the Brazilian Countryside: Paradigmatic and Territorial Disputes
title_full Development Models for the Brazilian Countryside: Paradigmatic and Territorial Disputes
title_fullStr Development Models for the Brazilian Countryside: Paradigmatic and Territorial Disputes
title_full_unstemmed Development Models for the Brazilian Countryside: Paradigmatic and Territorial Disputes
title_sort Development Models for the Brazilian Countryside: Paradigmatic and Territorial Disputes
author Fernandes, Bernardo Mancano [UNESP]
author_facet Fernandes, Bernardo Mancano [UNESP]
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
UNESCO
Columbia Univ
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Bernardo Mancano [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Peasantry
Agribusiness
Paradigm
Territory
Development
topic Peasantry
Agribusiness
Paradigm
Territory
Development
description Problems of land use and ownership result from the inequalities caused by the hegemonic form of capitalism, agribusiness. A possible alternative model has yet to be worked out, and there is a fundamental need to reflect on the struggle against the hegemony of capitalism and how to safeguard the interests of the peasantry. From this perspective, the agrarian question should be considered as a conflict between those favoring the interests of the peasantry and family farming and those favoring agribusiness. A paradigmatic debate about the roles of the Brazilian state, agribusiness, and the peasant movements in formulating public policy shows that the potential for the peasantry to grow food is threatened by the concentration of power, landownership, capital, technology, and wealth. Unless there is a change in the development model, the prospect is increasing inequality. The experiment with having two government ministries for agriculture is an important step in the shaping of policies to support family farming. Os problemas com uso e propriedade da terra sAo resultados das desigualdades causadas pelo modelo capitalista hegemonico denominado agronegocio. Um possivel modelo alternativo esta sendo gestado e ha necessidade de refletir sobre a luta contra a hegemonia do capitalismo e como salvaguardar os interesses dos camponeses. A partir desta perspectiva, a questAo agraria deve ser considerada como conflitualidade permanente entre os interesses dos camponeses ou agricultura familiar e os interesses do agronegocio. O debate paradigmatico contribui para compreender o papel do Estado brasileiro, do agronegocio e dos movimentos camponeses na formulacAo de politicas publicas. Tambem mostra que as possibilidades de criacAo de um modelo de desenvolvimento do campesinato esta ameacado pela concentracAo de poder, propriedade da terra, capital, tecnologia e riqueza nas mAos do agronegocio. Se nAo houver uma mudanca com a criacAo de um modelo de desenvolvimento voltado aos interesses da agricultura camponesa, a perspectiva e de aumento da desigualdade. A experiencia de ter dois ministerios para a agricultura e condicAo fundamental na definicAo de politicas de apoio a agricultura camponesa e familiar.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03-01
2018-11-27T10:34:24Z
2018-11-27T10:34:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0094582X15616117
Latin American Perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc, v. 43, n. 2, p. 48-59, 2016.
0094-582X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/165098
10.1177/0094582X15616117
WOS:000371614000003
WOS000371614000003.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0094582X15616117
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/165098
identifier_str_mv Latin American Perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc, v. 43, n. 2, p. 48-59, 2016.
0094-582X
10.1177/0094582X15616117
WOS:000371614000003
WOS000371614000003.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Latin American Perspectives
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 48-59
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sage Publications Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sage Publications Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129471838945280