Impacts of cow body condition score during gestation on weaning performance of the offspring

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marques, R. S.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Cooke, R. F., Rodrigues, M. C. [UNESP], Moriel, P., Bohnert, D. W.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.08.007
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/168872
Resumo: This experiment evaluated the impacts of cow body condition score (BCS) during gestation on productive parameters of the offspring. Three hundred multiparous, lactating, non-pregnant Angus × Hereford cows were assigned to a fixed-time artificial insemination (AI) protocol using semen from a single sire (d 0). Forty days after AI, cows were evaluated for pregnancy status via transrectal ultrasonography and BCS, and 100 pregnant cows (543±6 kg of BW, 6.6±0.3 yr of age, 4.83±0.06 of BCS, and 115±2 d postpartum) were selected for the experiment. Within these 100 cows, 20 cows had BCS ≥5.50 but ≤6.50 and were classified as adequate BCS (5.85±0.06; HBCS). The remaining cows had BCS ≤4.75 (4.52±0.03), and were divided into 4 groups (20 cows/group): LBCS (4.60±0.07), BCSG1 (4.43±0.07), BCSG2 (4.63±0.07), and BCSG3 (4.63±0.07). The HBCS and LBCS cows were managed to maintain their initial BCS throughout gestation. The BCSG1, BCSG2, and BCSG3 cows were managed to gain 1.50 BCS during the first, second, and third trimester of gestation, respectively, and maintain the resultant BCS until calving. Cow BCS was assessed again on d 102, 182, and 265. During the calving season (d 272-291), calf body weight (BW) was recorded within 3 h after birth. Only cows that met the BCS maintenance (within 0.50 of BCS change) and change (≥1.25 and ≤1.75 of BCS increase within the trimester) criteria were maintained in the experiment (HBCS, n =14; LBCS, n =14; BCSG1, n =14; BCSG2, n =15, BCSG3, n =15). On d 344, cow milk production was estimated by the weigh-suckle-weigh method, and calves were weaned on d 475. No differences were detected (P≥0.42) for calving rate, calf birth BW, and cow milk production. Weaning rate and calf age at weaning were also similar among BCS groups (P≥0.15). However, calf weaning BW was greater (P≤0.05) for BCSG2 and BCSG3 cows (265 and 262 kg, respectively; SEM =4) compared with HBCS and LBCS cows (248 and 249 kg, respectively; SEM =4), and similar (P≥0.20) among all other comparisons. These results suggest that offspring weaning BW is directly influenced by BCS gain of beef cows during the second and third trimesters of gestation.
id UNSP_8dbcee3a03b0182e3781c9f155c9d576
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/168872
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Impacts of cow body condition score during gestation on weaning performance of the offspringBeef cowBody condition scoreGestationOffspringPerformanceThis experiment evaluated the impacts of cow body condition score (BCS) during gestation on productive parameters of the offspring. Three hundred multiparous, lactating, non-pregnant Angus × Hereford cows were assigned to a fixed-time artificial insemination (AI) protocol using semen from a single sire (d 0). Forty days after AI, cows were evaluated for pregnancy status via transrectal ultrasonography and BCS, and 100 pregnant cows (543±6 kg of BW, 6.6±0.3 yr of age, 4.83±0.06 of BCS, and 115±2 d postpartum) were selected for the experiment. Within these 100 cows, 20 cows had BCS ≥5.50 but ≤6.50 and were classified as adequate BCS (5.85±0.06; HBCS). The remaining cows had BCS ≤4.75 (4.52±0.03), and were divided into 4 groups (20 cows/group): LBCS (4.60±0.07), BCSG1 (4.43±0.07), BCSG2 (4.63±0.07), and BCSG3 (4.63±0.07). The HBCS and LBCS cows were managed to maintain their initial BCS throughout gestation. The BCSG1, BCSG2, and BCSG3 cows were managed to gain 1.50 BCS during the first, second, and third trimester of gestation, respectively, and maintain the resultant BCS until calving. Cow BCS was assessed again on d 102, 182, and 265. During the calving season (d 272-291), calf body weight (BW) was recorded within 3 h after birth. Only cows that met the BCS maintenance (within 0.50 of BCS change) and change (≥1.25 and ≤1.75 of BCS increase within the trimester) criteria were maintained in the experiment (HBCS, n =14; LBCS, n =14; BCSG1, n =14; BCSG2, n =15, BCSG3, n =15). On d 344, cow milk production was estimated by the weigh-suckle-weigh method, and calves were weaned on d 475. No differences were detected (P≥0.42) for calving rate, calf birth BW, and cow milk production. Weaning rate and calf age at weaning were also similar among BCS groups (P≥0.15). However, calf weaning BW was greater (P≤0.05) for BCSG2 and BCSG3 cows (265 and 262 kg, respectively; SEM =4) compared with HBCS and LBCS cows (248 and 249 kg, respectively; SEM =4), and similar (P≥0.20) among all other comparisons. These results suggest that offspring weaning BW is directly influenced by BCS gain of beef cows during the second and third trimesters of gestation.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Oregon State University Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research CenterFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia UNESP – Univ. EstadualPaulistaUniversity of Florida Range Cattle Research and Education CenterFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia UNESP – Univ. EstadualPaulistaCNPq: 245312/2012-9Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research CenterUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Range Cattle Research and Education CenterMarques, R. S.Cooke, R. F.Rodrigues, M. C. [UNESP]Moriel, P.Bohnert, D. W.2018-12-11T16:43:26Z2018-12-11T16:43:26Z2016-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article174-178application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.08.007Livestock Science, v. 191, p. 174-178.1871-1413http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16887210.1016/j.livsci.2016.08.0072-s2.0-849813432882-s2.0-84981343288.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengLivestock Science0,730info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-14T06:16:58Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/168872Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-14T06:16:58Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impacts of cow body condition score during gestation on weaning performance of the offspring
title Impacts of cow body condition score during gestation on weaning performance of the offspring
spellingShingle Impacts of cow body condition score during gestation on weaning performance of the offspring
Marques, R. S.
Beef cow
Body condition score
Gestation
Offspring
Performance
title_short Impacts of cow body condition score during gestation on weaning performance of the offspring
title_full Impacts of cow body condition score during gestation on weaning performance of the offspring
title_fullStr Impacts of cow body condition score during gestation on weaning performance of the offspring
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of cow body condition score during gestation on weaning performance of the offspring
title_sort Impacts of cow body condition score during gestation on weaning performance of the offspring
author Marques, R. S.
author_facet Marques, R. S.
Cooke, R. F.
Rodrigues, M. C. [UNESP]
Moriel, P.
Bohnert, D. W.
author_role author
author2 Cooke, R. F.
Rodrigues, M. C. [UNESP]
Moriel, P.
Bohnert, D. W.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Range Cattle Research and Education Center
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marques, R. S.
Cooke, R. F.
Rodrigues, M. C. [UNESP]
Moriel, P.
Bohnert, D. W.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Beef cow
Body condition score
Gestation
Offspring
Performance
topic Beef cow
Body condition score
Gestation
Offspring
Performance
description This experiment evaluated the impacts of cow body condition score (BCS) during gestation on productive parameters of the offspring. Three hundred multiparous, lactating, non-pregnant Angus × Hereford cows were assigned to a fixed-time artificial insemination (AI) protocol using semen from a single sire (d 0). Forty days after AI, cows were evaluated for pregnancy status via transrectal ultrasonography and BCS, and 100 pregnant cows (543±6 kg of BW, 6.6±0.3 yr of age, 4.83±0.06 of BCS, and 115±2 d postpartum) were selected for the experiment. Within these 100 cows, 20 cows had BCS ≥5.50 but ≤6.50 and were classified as adequate BCS (5.85±0.06; HBCS). The remaining cows had BCS ≤4.75 (4.52±0.03), and were divided into 4 groups (20 cows/group): LBCS (4.60±0.07), BCSG1 (4.43±0.07), BCSG2 (4.63±0.07), and BCSG3 (4.63±0.07). The HBCS and LBCS cows were managed to maintain their initial BCS throughout gestation. The BCSG1, BCSG2, and BCSG3 cows were managed to gain 1.50 BCS during the first, second, and third trimester of gestation, respectively, and maintain the resultant BCS until calving. Cow BCS was assessed again on d 102, 182, and 265. During the calving season (d 272-291), calf body weight (BW) was recorded within 3 h after birth. Only cows that met the BCS maintenance (within 0.50 of BCS change) and change (≥1.25 and ≤1.75 of BCS increase within the trimester) criteria were maintained in the experiment (HBCS, n =14; LBCS, n =14; BCSG1, n =14; BCSG2, n =15, BCSG3, n =15). On d 344, cow milk production was estimated by the weigh-suckle-weigh method, and calves were weaned on d 475. No differences were detected (P≥0.42) for calving rate, calf birth BW, and cow milk production. Weaning rate and calf age at weaning were also similar among BCS groups (P≥0.15). However, calf weaning BW was greater (P≤0.05) for BCSG2 and BCSG3 cows (265 and 262 kg, respectively; SEM =4) compared with HBCS and LBCS cows (248 and 249 kg, respectively; SEM =4), and similar (P≥0.20) among all other comparisons. These results suggest that offspring weaning BW is directly influenced by BCS gain of beef cows during the second and third trimesters of gestation.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-01
2018-12-11T16:43:26Z
2018-12-11T16:43:26Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.08.007
Livestock Science, v. 191, p. 174-178.
1871-1413
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/168872
10.1016/j.livsci.2016.08.007
2-s2.0-84981343288
2-s2.0-84981343288.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.08.007
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/168872
identifier_str_mv Livestock Science, v. 191, p. 174-178.
1871-1413
10.1016/j.livsci.2016.08.007
2-s2.0-84981343288
2-s2.0-84981343288.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Livestock Science
0,730
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 174-178
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965276784033792