Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Juliana S.
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Miinchow, Eliseu A., Bordini, Ester A. Ferreira [UNESP], Oliveira da Rosa, Wellington Luiz de, Bottino, Marco C.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209491
Resumo: Introduction: This review aimed to provide a critical appraisal of alternative antimicrobial strategies in lieu of traditional triple antibiotic paste (TAP). Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The literature search was performed in 8 databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, BVS, SciELO, and the Cochrane Library), selecting clinical, in vitro, in vivo, and in situ studies that evaluated antimicrobial alternatives to TAP in regenerative endodontics. Studies lacking an experimental TAP group were excluded. Results: A total of 1705 potentially relevant records were initially identified. From the 38 studies retrieved for full-text reading, 16 fulfilled all selection criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. According to the study design, 11 studies were solely in vitro, 1 study was both in vitro and in vivo (animal model), 2 studies were solely animal experiments, and 2 studies were clinical trials. The alternative antimicrobial agents to TAP consisted of modified TAP formulations (eg, a combination of TAP with chitosan); TAP-eluting nanofibers; propolis; chlorhexidine (CHX) gels/solutions; double antibiotic pastes composed of distinct combinations of antibiotics; Ca(OH)2-based formulations; and sodium hypochlorite. Overall, most of the alternative agents performed similarly to TAP, although some strategies (eg, Ca(OH)2- and CHX-based formulations) seemed to present dubious importance in the control of infection. Conclusions: TAP still remains an excellent option in terms of the complete elimination of microorganisms. This review points to the use of electrospun fibers as a drug delivery system to offer a controlled release of the antimicrobial agent, as well as the use of natural compounds, deserving future investigation.
id UNSP_8ddae050c6684e5f7c1908715f5cea88
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/209491
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping ReviewAntimicrobial agentsnatural compoundsregenerative endodonticsscoping reviewIntroduction: This review aimed to provide a critical appraisal of alternative antimicrobial strategies in lieu of traditional triple antibiotic paste (TAP). Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The literature search was performed in 8 databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, BVS, SciELO, and the Cochrane Library), selecting clinical, in vitro, in vivo, and in situ studies that evaluated antimicrobial alternatives to TAP in regenerative endodontics. Studies lacking an experimental TAP group were excluded. Results: A total of 1705 potentially relevant records were initially identified. From the 38 studies retrieved for full-text reading, 16 fulfilled all selection criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. According to the study design, 11 studies were solely in vitro, 1 study was both in vitro and in vivo (animal model), 2 studies were solely animal experiments, and 2 studies were clinical trials. The alternative antimicrobial agents to TAP consisted of modified TAP formulations (eg, a combination of TAP with chitosan); TAP-eluting nanofibers; propolis; chlorhexidine (CHX) gels/solutions; double antibiotic pastes composed of distinct combinations of antibiotics; Ca(OH)2-based formulations; and sodium hypochlorite. Overall, most of the alternative agents performed similarly to TAP, although some strategies (eg, Ca(OH)2- and CHX-based formulations) seemed to present dubious importance in the control of infection. Conclusions: TAP still remains an excellent option in terms of the complete elimination of microorganisms. This review points to the use of electrospun fibers as a drug delivery system to offer a controlled release of the antimicrobial agent, as well as the use of natural compounds, deserving future investigation.National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Cariol Restorat Sci & Endodont, 1011 North Univ Ave,Room 5223, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAUniv Fed Pelotas, Sch Dent, Grad Program Dent, Pelotas, RS, BrazilUniv Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Sch Dent, Dept Conservat Dent, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Araraquara Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Araraquara Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara, SP, BrazilNational Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR): R01DE026578Elsevier B.V.Univ MichiganUniv Fed PelotasUniv Fed Rio Grande do SulUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Ribeiro, Juliana S.Miinchow, Eliseu A.Bordini, Ester A. Ferreira [UNESP]Oliveira da Rosa, Wellington Luiz deBottino, Marco C.2021-06-25T12:20:15Z2021-06-25T12:20:15Z2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleS115-S127http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032Journal Of Endodontics. New York: Elsevier Science Inc, v. 46, n. 9, p. S115-S127, 2020.0099-2399http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20949110.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032WOS:000573413200016Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Endodonticsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T19:28:13Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/209491Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T19:28:13Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review
title Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review
spellingShingle Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review
Ribeiro, Juliana S.
Antimicrobial agents
natural compounds
regenerative endodontics
scoping review
title_short Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review
title_full Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review
title_sort Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review
author Ribeiro, Juliana S.
author_facet Ribeiro, Juliana S.
Miinchow, Eliseu A.
Bordini, Ester A. Ferreira [UNESP]
Oliveira da Rosa, Wellington Luiz de
Bottino, Marco C.
author_role author
author2 Miinchow, Eliseu A.
Bordini, Ester A. Ferreira [UNESP]
Oliveira da Rosa, Wellington Luiz de
Bottino, Marco C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Univ Michigan
Univ Fed Pelotas
Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Juliana S.
Miinchow, Eliseu A.
Bordini, Ester A. Ferreira [UNESP]
Oliveira da Rosa, Wellington Luiz de
Bottino, Marco C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Antimicrobial agents
natural compounds
regenerative endodontics
scoping review
topic Antimicrobial agents
natural compounds
regenerative endodontics
scoping review
description Introduction: This review aimed to provide a critical appraisal of alternative antimicrobial strategies in lieu of traditional triple antibiotic paste (TAP). Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The literature search was performed in 8 databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, BVS, SciELO, and the Cochrane Library), selecting clinical, in vitro, in vivo, and in situ studies that evaluated antimicrobial alternatives to TAP in regenerative endodontics. Studies lacking an experimental TAP group were excluded. Results: A total of 1705 potentially relevant records were initially identified. From the 38 studies retrieved for full-text reading, 16 fulfilled all selection criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. According to the study design, 11 studies were solely in vitro, 1 study was both in vitro and in vivo (animal model), 2 studies were solely animal experiments, and 2 studies were clinical trials. The alternative antimicrobial agents to TAP consisted of modified TAP formulations (eg, a combination of TAP with chitosan); TAP-eluting nanofibers; propolis; chlorhexidine (CHX) gels/solutions; double antibiotic pastes composed of distinct combinations of antibiotics; Ca(OH)2-based formulations; and sodium hypochlorite. Overall, most of the alternative agents performed similarly to TAP, although some strategies (eg, Ca(OH)2- and CHX-based formulations) seemed to present dubious importance in the control of infection. Conclusions: TAP still remains an excellent option in terms of the complete elimination of microorganisms. This review points to the use of electrospun fibers as a drug delivery system to offer a controlled release of the antimicrobial agent, as well as the use of natural compounds, deserving future investigation.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-01
2021-06-25T12:20:15Z
2021-06-25T12:20:15Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032
Journal Of Endodontics. New York: Elsevier Science Inc, v. 46, n. 9, p. S115-S127, 2020.
0099-2399
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209491
10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032
WOS:000573413200016
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209491
identifier_str_mv Journal Of Endodontics. New York: Elsevier Science Inc, v. 46, n. 9, p. S115-S127, 2020.
0099-2399
10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032
WOS:000573413200016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal Of Endodontics
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv S115-S127
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803047495472775168