Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032 |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209491 |
Resumo: | Introduction: This review aimed to provide a critical appraisal of alternative antimicrobial strategies in lieu of traditional triple antibiotic paste (TAP). Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The literature search was performed in 8 databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, BVS, SciELO, and the Cochrane Library), selecting clinical, in vitro, in vivo, and in situ studies that evaluated antimicrobial alternatives to TAP in regenerative endodontics. Studies lacking an experimental TAP group were excluded. Results: A total of 1705 potentially relevant records were initially identified. From the 38 studies retrieved for full-text reading, 16 fulfilled all selection criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. According to the study design, 11 studies were solely in vitro, 1 study was both in vitro and in vivo (animal model), 2 studies were solely animal experiments, and 2 studies were clinical trials. The alternative antimicrobial agents to TAP consisted of modified TAP formulations (eg, a combination of TAP with chitosan); TAP-eluting nanofibers; propolis; chlorhexidine (CHX) gels/solutions; double antibiotic pastes composed of distinct combinations of antibiotics; Ca(OH)2-based formulations; and sodium hypochlorite. Overall, most of the alternative agents performed similarly to TAP, although some strategies (eg, Ca(OH)2- and CHX-based formulations) seemed to present dubious importance in the control of infection. Conclusions: TAP still remains an excellent option in terms of the complete elimination of microorganisms. This review points to the use of electrospun fibers as a drug delivery system to offer a controlled release of the antimicrobial agent, as well as the use of natural compounds, deserving future investigation. |
id |
UNSP_8ddae050c6684e5f7c1908715f5cea88 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/209491 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping ReviewAntimicrobial agentsnatural compoundsregenerative endodonticsscoping reviewIntroduction: This review aimed to provide a critical appraisal of alternative antimicrobial strategies in lieu of traditional triple antibiotic paste (TAP). Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The literature search was performed in 8 databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, BVS, SciELO, and the Cochrane Library), selecting clinical, in vitro, in vivo, and in situ studies that evaluated antimicrobial alternatives to TAP in regenerative endodontics. Studies lacking an experimental TAP group were excluded. Results: A total of 1705 potentially relevant records were initially identified. From the 38 studies retrieved for full-text reading, 16 fulfilled all selection criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. According to the study design, 11 studies were solely in vitro, 1 study was both in vitro and in vivo (animal model), 2 studies were solely animal experiments, and 2 studies were clinical trials. The alternative antimicrobial agents to TAP consisted of modified TAP formulations (eg, a combination of TAP with chitosan); TAP-eluting nanofibers; propolis; chlorhexidine (CHX) gels/solutions; double antibiotic pastes composed of distinct combinations of antibiotics; Ca(OH)2-based formulations; and sodium hypochlorite. Overall, most of the alternative agents performed similarly to TAP, although some strategies (eg, Ca(OH)2- and CHX-based formulations) seemed to present dubious importance in the control of infection. Conclusions: TAP still remains an excellent option in terms of the complete elimination of microorganisms. This review points to the use of electrospun fibers as a drug delivery system to offer a controlled release of the antimicrobial agent, as well as the use of natural compounds, deserving future investigation.National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Cariol Restorat Sci & Endodont, 1011 North Univ Ave,Room 5223, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAUniv Fed Pelotas, Sch Dent, Grad Program Dent, Pelotas, RS, BrazilUniv Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Sch Dent, Dept Conservat Dent, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Araraquara Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Araraquara Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara, SP, BrazilNational Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR): R01DE026578Elsevier B.V.Univ MichiganUniv Fed PelotasUniv Fed Rio Grande do SulUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Ribeiro, Juliana S.Miinchow, Eliseu A.Bordini, Ester A. Ferreira [UNESP]Oliveira da Rosa, Wellington Luiz deBottino, Marco C.2021-06-25T12:20:15Z2021-06-25T12:20:15Z2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleS115-S127http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032Journal Of Endodontics. New York: Elsevier Science Inc, v. 46, n. 9, p. S115-S127, 2020.0099-2399http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20949110.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032WOS:000573413200016Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Endodonticsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T14:57:35Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/209491Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T14:57:35Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review |
title |
Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review |
spellingShingle |
Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review Ribeiro, Juliana S. Antimicrobial agents natural compounds regenerative endodontics scoping review Ribeiro, Juliana S. Antimicrobial agents natural compounds regenerative endodontics scoping review |
title_short |
Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review |
title_full |
Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr |
Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review |
title_sort |
Antimicrobial Therapeutics in Regenerative Endodontics: A Scoping Review |
author |
Ribeiro, Juliana S. |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Juliana S. Ribeiro, Juliana S. Miinchow, Eliseu A. Bordini, Ester A. Ferreira [UNESP] Oliveira da Rosa, Wellington Luiz de Bottino, Marco C. Miinchow, Eliseu A. Bordini, Ester A. Ferreira [UNESP] Oliveira da Rosa, Wellington Luiz de Bottino, Marco C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Miinchow, Eliseu A. Bordini, Ester A. Ferreira [UNESP] Oliveira da Rosa, Wellington Luiz de Bottino, Marco C. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Michigan Univ Fed Pelotas Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Juliana S. Miinchow, Eliseu A. Bordini, Ester A. Ferreira [UNESP] Oliveira da Rosa, Wellington Luiz de Bottino, Marco C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antimicrobial agents natural compounds regenerative endodontics scoping review |
topic |
Antimicrobial agents natural compounds regenerative endodontics scoping review |
description |
Introduction: This review aimed to provide a critical appraisal of alternative antimicrobial strategies in lieu of traditional triple antibiotic paste (TAP). Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The literature search was performed in 8 databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, BVS, SciELO, and the Cochrane Library), selecting clinical, in vitro, in vivo, and in situ studies that evaluated antimicrobial alternatives to TAP in regenerative endodontics. Studies lacking an experimental TAP group were excluded. Results: A total of 1705 potentially relevant records were initially identified. From the 38 studies retrieved for full-text reading, 16 fulfilled all selection criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. According to the study design, 11 studies were solely in vitro, 1 study was both in vitro and in vivo (animal model), 2 studies were solely animal experiments, and 2 studies were clinical trials. The alternative antimicrobial agents to TAP consisted of modified TAP formulations (eg, a combination of TAP with chitosan); TAP-eluting nanofibers; propolis; chlorhexidine (CHX) gels/solutions; double antibiotic pastes composed of distinct combinations of antibiotics; Ca(OH)2-based formulations; and sodium hypochlorite. Overall, most of the alternative agents performed similarly to TAP, although some strategies (eg, Ca(OH)2- and CHX-based formulations) seemed to present dubious importance in the control of infection. Conclusions: TAP still remains an excellent option in terms of the complete elimination of microorganisms. This review points to the use of electrospun fibers as a drug delivery system to offer a controlled release of the antimicrobial agent, as well as the use of natural compounds, deserving future investigation. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-01 2021-06-25T12:20:15Z 2021-06-25T12:20:15Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032 Journal Of Endodontics. New York: Elsevier Science Inc, v. 46, n. 9, p. S115-S127, 2020. 0099-2399 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209491 10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032 WOS:000573413200016 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209491 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal Of Endodontics. New York: Elsevier Science Inc, v. 46, n. 9, p. S115-S127, 2020. 0099-2399 10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032 WOS:000573413200016 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal Of Endodontics |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
S115-S127 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1822219166567890944 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.032 |