Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/26422 |
Resumo: | This study evaluated the efficacy of probiotic utilization as growth promoters in broiler chicken feeding using systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Thirty-five studies were recovered by the systematic review, 27 of which met the following criteria to be included in the meta-analysis: (1) Brazilian studies published between 1995 and 2005; (2) probiotics administered in the diet without growth promoter; (3) results included performance data with the respective coefficient of variation. Meta-analysis have shown that the probiotics promoted better weight gain and feed conversion than the negative control (no antimicrobial) in the initial phase (1 to 20-28 days); nevertheless, results were similar in the total period (1 to 35-48 days). Weight gain and feed conversion were similar between probiotics and the positive control (with antimicrobial) both in the initial and in the total periods. Viability in the total period improved with the use of probiotics in comparison to the negative or positive controls. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results of meta-analysis were coherent. The funnel plots and the Egger regression method evidenced that the studies published in Brazil do not present biased results. It is possible to conclude that the probiotics are a technically viable alternative to antimicrobial growth promoters in broiler feeding. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary to identify eventual differences among the probiotics commercially available in Brazil. |
id |
UNSP_91dbda39a04a7c57d2083b3b045f004c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/26422 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysisBirdsintestinal microfloramicroorganismperformanceThis study evaluated the efficacy of probiotic utilization as growth promoters in broiler chicken feeding using systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Thirty-five studies were recovered by the systematic review, 27 of which met the following criteria to be included in the meta-analysis: (1) Brazilian studies published between 1995 and 2005; (2) probiotics administered in the diet without growth promoter; (3) results included performance data with the respective coefficient of variation. Meta-analysis have shown that the probiotics promoted better weight gain and feed conversion than the negative control (no antimicrobial) in the initial phase (1 to 20-28 days); nevertheless, results were similar in the total period (1 to 35-48 days). Weight gain and feed conversion were similar between probiotics and the positive control (with antimicrobial) both in the initial and in the total periods. Viability in the total period improved with the use of probiotics in comparison to the negative or positive controls. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results of meta-analysis were coherent. The funnel plots and the Egger regression method evidenced that the studies published in Brazil do not present biased results. It is possible to conclude that the probiotics are a technically viable alternative to antimicrobial growth promoters in broiler feeding. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary to identify eventual differences among the probiotics commercially available in Brazil.Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e VeterináriasUniversidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de AlimentosEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) Suínos e Aves CNPSAUniversidade do ContestadoUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e VeterináriasFundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia AvícolasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Universidade do ContestadoFaria Filho, DE [UNESP]Torres, KAA [UNESP]Faria, DECampos, DMB [UNESP]Rosa, PS [UNESP]2014-05-20T15:07:13Z2014-05-20T15:07:13Z2006-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article89-98application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 8, n. 2, p. 89-98, 2006.1516-635Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/2642210.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004S1516-635X2006000200004S1516-635X2006000200004.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola0.463info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-17T06:09:09Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/26422Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:54:25.557560Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis Faria Filho, DE [UNESP] Birds intestinal microflora microorganism performance |
title_short |
Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Faria Filho, DE [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Faria Filho, DE [UNESP] Torres, KAA [UNESP] Faria, DE Campos, DMB [UNESP] Rosa, PS [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Torres, KAA [UNESP] Faria, DE Campos, DMB [UNESP] Rosa, PS [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) Universidade do Contestado |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Faria Filho, DE [UNESP] Torres, KAA [UNESP] Faria, DE Campos, DMB [UNESP] Rosa, PS [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Birds intestinal microflora microorganism performance |
topic |
Birds intestinal microflora microorganism performance |
description |
This study evaluated the efficacy of probiotic utilization as growth promoters in broiler chicken feeding using systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Thirty-five studies were recovered by the systematic review, 27 of which met the following criteria to be included in the meta-analysis: (1) Brazilian studies published between 1995 and 2005; (2) probiotics administered in the diet without growth promoter; (3) results included performance data with the respective coefficient of variation. Meta-analysis have shown that the probiotics promoted better weight gain and feed conversion than the negative control (no antimicrobial) in the initial phase (1 to 20-28 days); nevertheless, results were similar in the total period (1 to 35-48 days). Weight gain and feed conversion were similar between probiotics and the positive control (with antimicrobial) both in the initial and in the total periods. Viability in the total period improved with the use of probiotics in comparison to the negative or positive controls. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results of meta-analysis were coherent. The funnel plots and the Egger regression method evidenced that the studies published in Brazil do not present biased results. It is possible to conclude that the probiotics are a technically viable alternative to antimicrobial growth promoters in broiler feeding. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary to identify eventual differences among the probiotics commercially available in Brazil. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-06-01 2014-05-20T15:07:13Z 2014-05-20T15:07:13Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004 Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 8, n. 2, p. 89-98, 2006. 1516-635X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/26422 10.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004 S1516-635X2006000200004 S1516-635X2006000200004.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/26422 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 8, n. 2, p. 89-98, 2006. 1516-635X 10.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004 S1516-635X2006000200004 S1516-635X2006000200004.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola 0.463 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
89-98 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128874135945216 |