Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Faria Filho, DE [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Torres, KAA [UNESP], Faria, DE, Campos, DMB [UNESP], Rosa, PS [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/26422
Resumo: This study evaluated the efficacy of probiotic utilization as growth promoters in broiler chicken feeding using systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Thirty-five studies were recovered by the systematic review, 27 of which met the following criteria to be included in the meta-analysis: (1) Brazilian studies published between 1995 and 2005; (2) probiotics administered in the diet without growth promoter; (3) results included performance data with the respective coefficient of variation. Meta-analysis have shown that the probiotics promoted better weight gain and feed conversion than the negative control (no antimicrobial) in the initial phase (1 to 20-28 days); nevertheless, results were similar in the total period (1 to 35-48 days). Weight gain and feed conversion were similar between probiotics and the positive control (with antimicrobial) both in the initial and in the total periods. Viability in the total period improved with the use of probiotics in comparison to the negative or positive controls. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results of meta-analysis were coherent. The funnel plots and the Egger regression method evidenced that the studies published in Brazil do not present biased results. It is possible to conclude that the probiotics are a technically viable alternative to antimicrobial growth promoters in broiler feeding. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary to identify eventual differences among the probiotics commercially available in Brazil.
id UNSP_91dbda39a04a7c57d2083b3b045f004c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/26422
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysisBirdsintestinal microfloramicroorganismperformanceThis study evaluated the efficacy of probiotic utilization as growth promoters in broiler chicken feeding using systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Thirty-five studies were recovered by the systematic review, 27 of which met the following criteria to be included in the meta-analysis: (1) Brazilian studies published between 1995 and 2005; (2) probiotics administered in the diet without growth promoter; (3) results included performance data with the respective coefficient of variation. Meta-analysis have shown that the probiotics promoted better weight gain and feed conversion than the negative control (no antimicrobial) in the initial phase (1 to 20-28 days); nevertheless, results were similar in the total period (1 to 35-48 days). Weight gain and feed conversion were similar between probiotics and the positive control (with antimicrobial) both in the initial and in the total periods. Viability in the total period improved with the use of probiotics in comparison to the negative or positive controls. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results of meta-analysis were coherent. The funnel plots and the Egger regression method evidenced that the studies published in Brazil do not present biased results. It is possible to conclude that the probiotics are a technically viable alternative to antimicrobial growth promoters in broiler feeding. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary to identify eventual differences among the probiotics commercially available in Brazil.Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e VeterináriasUniversidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de AlimentosEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) Suínos e Aves CNPSAUniversidade do ContestadoUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e VeterináriasFundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia AvícolasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Universidade do ContestadoFaria Filho, DE [UNESP]Torres, KAA [UNESP]Faria, DECampos, DMB [UNESP]Rosa, PS [UNESP]2014-05-20T15:07:13Z2014-05-20T15:07:13Z2006-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article89-98application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 8, n. 2, p. 89-98, 2006.1516-635Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/2642210.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004S1516-635X2006000200004S1516-635X2006000200004.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola0.463info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-17T06:09:09Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/26422Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:54:25.557560Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis
Faria Filho, DE [UNESP]
Birds
intestinal microflora
microorganism
performance
title_short Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis
author Faria Filho, DE [UNESP]
author_facet Faria Filho, DE [UNESP]
Torres, KAA [UNESP]
Faria, DE
Campos, DMB [UNESP]
Rosa, PS [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Torres, KAA [UNESP]
Faria, DE
Campos, DMB [UNESP]
Rosa, PS [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
Universidade do Contestado
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Faria Filho, DE [UNESP]
Torres, KAA [UNESP]
Faria, DE
Campos, DMB [UNESP]
Rosa, PS [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Birds
intestinal microflora
microorganism
performance
topic Birds
intestinal microflora
microorganism
performance
description This study evaluated the efficacy of probiotic utilization as growth promoters in broiler chicken feeding using systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Thirty-five studies were recovered by the systematic review, 27 of which met the following criteria to be included in the meta-analysis: (1) Brazilian studies published between 1995 and 2005; (2) probiotics administered in the diet without growth promoter; (3) results included performance data with the respective coefficient of variation. Meta-analysis have shown that the probiotics promoted better weight gain and feed conversion than the negative control (no antimicrobial) in the initial phase (1 to 20-28 days); nevertheless, results were similar in the total period (1 to 35-48 days). Weight gain and feed conversion were similar between probiotics and the positive control (with antimicrobial) both in the initial and in the total periods. Viability in the total period improved with the use of probiotics in comparison to the negative or positive controls. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results of meta-analysis were coherent. The funnel plots and the Egger regression method evidenced that the studies published in Brazil do not present biased results. It is possible to conclude that the probiotics are a technically viable alternative to antimicrobial growth promoters in broiler feeding. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary to identify eventual differences among the probiotics commercially available in Brazil.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-06-01
2014-05-20T15:07:13Z
2014-05-20T15:07:13Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004
Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 8, n. 2, p. 89-98, 2006.
1516-635X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/26422
10.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004
S1516-635X2006000200004
S1516-635X2006000200004.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/26422
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 8, n. 2, p. 89-98, 2006.
1516-635X
10.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004
S1516-635X2006000200004
S1516-635X2006000200004.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola
0.463
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 89-98
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128874135945216