Rates and sources of nitrogen fertilizer application on yield and quality of Panicum maximum cv. Mombasa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Galindo, Fernando Shintate [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Buzetti, Salatiér [UNESP], Filho, Marcelo Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira [UNESP], Dupas, Elisângela [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292019000200067
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228730
Resumo: The effects of nitrogen fertilizer sources (urea and ammonium nitrate) applied at different rates on the yield and quality of Megathyrsus maximus cv. Mombasa were compared in this study. The nitrogen rates applied after each monthly harvest were 0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg N/ha (i.e., 0, 150, 300, 450 and 600 kg N/ha/year). The N fertilizer sources did not affect the Mombasa grass response to any of the production and nutritional characteristics; however, increasing nitrogen rates there was significantly increased dry matter yield and crude protein percentage, and decreased neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentrations. Dry matter yield in control treatments was 31.3 t/ha, and responses reached a maximum of 30% with the application of 150 kg N/ha/cut, but considering the economical rate, the better economic return occurs with the application of 115 kg N/ha/cut. As urea has a lower price per unit of N than ammonium nitrate, it seems to be the best choice of fertilizer. Further studies are needed to determine why the dry matter yields of forage were so high and in what seasons should N fertilizer be applied when resources are limited. Longer-term studies would confirm these findings and assess the losses of N to the atmosphere or by leaching, especially at the higher rates.
id UNSP_944200ce2c51638c26c6999efd3a8f83
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/228730
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Rates and sources of nitrogen fertilizer application on yield and quality of Panicum maximum cv. MombasaEfecto de dosis y forma de aplicación de fertilizante nitrogenado en el rendimiento y calidad de Panicum maximum cv. MombasaAmmonium nitrateCrude proteinFertilizer responsesGuinea grassUreaThe effects of nitrogen fertilizer sources (urea and ammonium nitrate) applied at different rates on the yield and quality of Megathyrsus maximus cv. Mombasa were compared in this study. The nitrogen rates applied after each monthly harvest were 0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg N/ha (i.e., 0, 150, 300, 450 and 600 kg N/ha/year). The N fertilizer sources did not affect the Mombasa grass response to any of the production and nutritional characteristics; however, increasing nitrogen rates there was significantly increased dry matter yield and crude protein percentage, and decreased neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentrations. Dry matter yield in control treatments was 31.3 t/ha, and responses reached a maximum of 30% with the application of 150 kg N/ha/cut, but considering the economical rate, the better economic return occurs with the application of 115 kg N/ha/cut. As urea has a lower price per unit of N than ammonium nitrate, it seems to be the best choice of fertilizer. Further studies are needed to determine why the dry matter yields of forage were so high and in what seasons should N fertilizer be applied when resources are limited. Longer-term studies would confirm these findings and assess the losses of N to the atmosphere or by leaching, especially at the higher rates.Department of Plant Health Rural Engineering and Soils Faculdade de Engenharia de Ilha Solteira Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”Department of Plant Health Rural Engineering and Soils Faculdade de Engenharia de Ilha Solteira Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Galindo, Fernando Shintate [UNESP]Buzetti, Salatiér [UNESP]Filho, Marcelo Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira [UNESP]Dupas, Elisângela [UNESP]2022-04-29T08:28:25Z2022-04-29T08:28:25Z2019-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article67-73http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292019000200067Idesia, v. 37, n. 2, p. 67-73, 2019.0718-34290073-4675http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22873010.4067/S0718-342920190002000672-s2.0-85073424656Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengIdesiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-07-05T18:12:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/228730Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:58:37.807237Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rates and sources of nitrogen fertilizer application on yield and quality of Panicum maximum cv. Mombasa
Efecto de dosis y forma de aplicación de fertilizante nitrogenado en el rendimiento y calidad de Panicum maximum cv. Mombasa
title Rates and sources of nitrogen fertilizer application on yield and quality of Panicum maximum cv. Mombasa
spellingShingle Rates and sources of nitrogen fertilizer application on yield and quality of Panicum maximum cv. Mombasa
Galindo, Fernando Shintate [UNESP]
Ammonium nitrate
Crude protein
Fertilizer responses
Guinea grass
Urea
title_short Rates and sources of nitrogen fertilizer application on yield and quality of Panicum maximum cv. Mombasa
title_full Rates and sources of nitrogen fertilizer application on yield and quality of Panicum maximum cv. Mombasa
title_fullStr Rates and sources of nitrogen fertilizer application on yield and quality of Panicum maximum cv. Mombasa
title_full_unstemmed Rates and sources of nitrogen fertilizer application on yield and quality of Panicum maximum cv. Mombasa
title_sort Rates and sources of nitrogen fertilizer application on yield and quality of Panicum maximum cv. Mombasa
author Galindo, Fernando Shintate [UNESP]
author_facet Galindo, Fernando Shintate [UNESP]
Buzetti, Salatiér [UNESP]
Filho, Marcelo Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira [UNESP]
Dupas, Elisângela [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Buzetti, Salatiér [UNESP]
Filho, Marcelo Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira [UNESP]
Dupas, Elisângela [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Galindo, Fernando Shintate [UNESP]
Buzetti, Salatiér [UNESP]
Filho, Marcelo Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira [UNESP]
Dupas, Elisângela [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ammonium nitrate
Crude protein
Fertilizer responses
Guinea grass
Urea
topic Ammonium nitrate
Crude protein
Fertilizer responses
Guinea grass
Urea
description The effects of nitrogen fertilizer sources (urea and ammonium nitrate) applied at different rates on the yield and quality of Megathyrsus maximus cv. Mombasa were compared in this study. The nitrogen rates applied after each monthly harvest were 0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg N/ha (i.e., 0, 150, 300, 450 and 600 kg N/ha/year). The N fertilizer sources did not affect the Mombasa grass response to any of the production and nutritional characteristics; however, increasing nitrogen rates there was significantly increased dry matter yield and crude protein percentage, and decreased neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentrations. Dry matter yield in control treatments was 31.3 t/ha, and responses reached a maximum of 30% with the application of 150 kg N/ha/cut, but considering the economical rate, the better economic return occurs with the application of 115 kg N/ha/cut. As urea has a lower price per unit of N than ammonium nitrate, it seems to be the best choice of fertilizer. Further studies are needed to determine why the dry matter yields of forage were so high and in what seasons should N fertilizer be applied when resources are limited. Longer-term studies would confirm these findings and assess the losses of N to the atmosphere or by leaching, especially at the higher rates.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-01
2022-04-29T08:28:25Z
2022-04-29T08:28:25Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292019000200067
Idesia, v. 37, n. 2, p. 67-73, 2019.
0718-3429
0073-4675
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228730
10.4067/S0718-34292019000200067
2-s2.0-85073424656
url http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292019000200067
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228730
identifier_str_mv Idesia, v. 37, n. 2, p. 67-73, 2019.
0718-3429
0073-4675
10.4067/S0718-34292019000200067
2-s2.0-85073424656
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Idesia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 67-73
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128588924321792