THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION: A BRIEF EXPLANATION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
DOI: | 10.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1336 |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1336 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195203 |
Resumo: | How is scientific progress effected? Are there criteria for choosing scientific theories? What is the impact of cognitive and extracognitive values on such choices? To address issues like these, science philosopher Thomas Kuhn develops a structuralist perspective with a historical basis. In this paper, we expose the structure of scientific revolutions suggested by this thinker. Initially, we deal with the notion of paradigm, a key concept in its explanation of the functioning of science and scientific progress. Then we present the phases through which an area of research commonly goes through its trajectory: pre-science, normal science, crisis and revolution. We conclude the paper by drawing some parallels of this thinker's position with other epistemological perspectives of the last century, such as Logical Positivism, Falsificationism, and Lakatos Structuralism. |
id |
UNSP_9647c135132d6d3b75729d43f95b9f80 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/195203 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION: A BRIEF EXPLANATIONParadigmScientific progressScientific revolutionNormal scienceHow is scientific progress effected? Are there criteria for choosing scientific theories? What is the impact of cognitive and extracognitive values on such choices? To address issues like these, science philosopher Thomas Kuhn develops a structuralist perspective with a historical basis. In this paper, we expose the structure of scientific revolutions suggested by this thinker. Initially, we deal with the notion of paradigm, a key concept in its explanation of the functioning of science and scientific progress. Then we present the phases through which an area of research commonly goes through its trajectory: pre-science, normal science, crisis and revolution. We conclude the paper by drawing some parallels of this thinker's position with other epistemological perspectives of the last century, such as Logical Positivism, Falsificationism, and Lakatos Structuralism.Univ Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Filosofia, Marilia, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Marilia, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Filosofia, Marilia, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Marilia, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Reconcavo Bahia, Centro Formacao ProfessoresUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Alves, Marcos Antonio [UNESP]Valente, Alan Rafael [UNESP]2020-12-10T17:26:43Z2020-12-10T17:26:43Z2020-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article173-192http://dx.doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1336Griot-revista De Filosofia. Centro Amargosa: Univ Fed Reconcavo Bahia, Centro Formacao Professores, v. 20, n. 1, p. 173-192, 2020.2178-1036http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19520310.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1336WOS:000514209600015Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporGriot-revista De Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T05:55:35Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/195203Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:08:47.370676Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION: A BRIEF EXPLANATION |
title |
THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION: A BRIEF EXPLANATION |
spellingShingle |
THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION: A BRIEF EXPLANATION THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION: A BRIEF EXPLANATION Alves, Marcos Antonio [UNESP] Paradigm Scientific progress Scientific revolution Normal science Alves, Marcos Antonio [UNESP] Paradigm Scientific progress Scientific revolution Normal science |
title_short |
THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION: A BRIEF EXPLANATION |
title_full |
THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION: A BRIEF EXPLANATION |
title_fullStr |
THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION: A BRIEF EXPLANATION THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION: A BRIEF EXPLANATION |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION: A BRIEF EXPLANATION THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION: A BRIEF EXPLANATION |
title_sort |
THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION: A BRIEF EXPLANATION |
author |
Alves, Marcos Antonio [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Alves, Marcos Antonio [UNESP] Alves, Marcos Antonio [UNESP] Valente, Alan Rafael [UNESP] Valente, Alan Rafael [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Valente, Alan Rafael [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alves, Marcos Antonio [UNESP] Valente, Alan Rafael [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Paradigm Scientific progress Scientific revolution Normal science |
topic |
Paradigm Scientific progress Scientific revolution Normal science |
description |
How is scientific progress effected? Are there criteria for choosing scientific theories? What is the impact of cognitive and extracognitive values on such choices? To address issues like these, science philosopher Thomas Kuhn develops a structuralist perspective with a historical basis. In this paper, we expose the structure of scientific revolutions suggested by this thinker. Initially, we deal with the notion of paradigm, a key concept in its explanation of the functioning of science and scientific progress. Then we present the phases through which an area of research commonly goes through its trajectory: pre-science, normal science, crisis and revolution. We conclude the paper by drawing some parallels of this thinker's position with other epistemological perspectives of the last century, such as Logical Positivism, Falsificationism, and Lakatos Structuralism. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-10T17:26:43Z 2020-12-10T17:26:43Z 2020-02-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1336 Griot-revista De Filosofia. Centro Amargosa: Univ Fed Reconcavo Bahia, Centro Formacao Professores, v. 20, n. 1, p. 173-192, 2020. 2178-1036 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195203 10.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1336 WOS:000514209600015 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1336 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195203 |
identifier_str_mv |
Griot-revista De Filosofia. Centro Amargosa: Univ Fed Reconcavo Bahia, Centro Formacao Professores, v. 20, n. 1, p. 173-192, 2020. 2178-1036 10.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1336 WOS:000514209600015 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot-revista De Filosofia |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
173-192 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Fed Reconcavo Bahia, Centro Formacao Professores |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Fed Reconcavo Bahia, Centro Formacao Professores |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822166272583925760 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1336 |