Management of pig manure to mitigate NO and yield-scaled N2O emissions in an irrigated Mediterranean crop
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.09.022 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169190 |
Resumo: | Substitution of conventional mineral fertilizers with organic sources can avoid the environmental problems associated with high concentrations of intensive livestock production in some Mediterranean areas. Some management practices, such as the use of nitrification inhibitors or more efficient irrigation techniques (e.g., drip irrigation), have been suggested as effective alternatives to mitigate nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) emissions released from soils amended with synthetic and organic fertilizers. In this experiment, we aimed to assess the effect of different organic amendments derived from pig manure (control without N fertilization (C); liquid fraction of pig slurry (LFPS); pig urine with the nitrification inhibitor 3,4 dimethylpyrazolephosphate (DMPP) (LFPSI); compost from the solid phase of pig slurry (COM)) compared to urea (U) and two different irrigation systems (the widespread sprinkler and alternative drip irrigation systems) on greenhouse gas (N2O, methane, CH4, and carbon dioxide, CO2) and NO emissions in a maize (Zea mays L.) crop. The effect of these treatments on crop yields and yield-scaled N2O emissions were also evaluated. The use of DMPP with LFPS was an effective practice to reduce N2O and NO losses (40 and 32% mitigation, respectively, compared to LFPS alone), and was also associated with the highest rates of CH4 oxidation. Drip irrigation significantly reduced the global warming potential (in spite of a lower CH4 sink) but increased the NO losses by 58%, as opposed to sprinkler irrigation. The higher biomass production and similar grain yields observed with drip irrigation resulted in lower yield-scaled N2O emissions in this treatment than in sprinkler irrigation. The use of organic fertilizers penalized grain yields compared to U (16–33%), although the differences were not significant in the case of LFPSI. Consequently, LFPSI in drip irrigation was (together with U applied by drip-fertigation) the treatment that led to the lowest yield-scaled N2O emissions. The use of organic N sources in irrigated maize is an environmentally advisable strategy in Mediterranean cropping systems, but an optimum balance between N oxides and greenhouse gas losses, N efficiency and crop yields requires the use of nitrification inhibitors (e.g., DMPP) with liquid organic sources. |
id |
UNSP_96ae65a7e8a5335c08e56f619eb5c8bd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169190 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Management of pig manure to mitigate NO and yield-scaled N2O emissions in an irrigated Mediterranean cropCompostGHG emissionsIrrigation systemNitrification inhibitorPig slurrySubstitution of conventional mineral fertilizers with organic sources can avoid the environmental problems associated with high concentrations of intensive livestock production in some Mediterranean areas. Some management practices, such as the use of nitrification inhibitors or more efficient irrigation techniques (e.g., drip irrigation), have been suggested as effective alternatives to mitigate nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) emissions released from soils amended with synthetic and organic fertilizers. In this experiment, we aimed to assess the effect of different organic amendments derived from pig manure (control without N fertilization (C); liquid fraction of pig slurry (LFPS); pig urine with the nitrification inhibitor 3,4 dimethylpyrazolephosphate (DMPP) (LFPSI); compost from the solid phase of pig slurry (COM)) compared to urea (U) and two different irrigation systems (the widespread sprinkler and alternative drip irrigation systems) on greenhouse gas (N2O, methane, CH4, and carbon dioxide, CO2) and NO emissions in a maize (Zea mays L.) crop. The effect of these treatments on crop yields and yield-scaled N2O emissions were also evaluated. The use of DMPP with LFPS was an effective practice to reduce N2O and NO losses (40 and 32% mitigation, respectively, compared to LFPS alone), and was also associated with the highest rates of CH4 oxidation. Drip irrigation significantly reduced the global warming potential (in spite of a lower CH4 sink) but increased the NO losses by 58%, as opposed to sprinkler irrigation. The higher biomass production and similar grain yields observed with drip irrigation resulted in lower yield-scaled N2O emissions in this treatment than in sprinkler irrigation. The use of organic fertilizers penalized grain yields compared to U (16–33%), although the differences were not significant in the case of LFPSI. Consequently, LFPSI in drip irrigation was (together with U applied by drip-fertigation) the treatment that led to the lowest yield-scaled N2O emissions. The use of organic N sources in irrigated maize is an environmentally advisable strategy in Mediterranean cropping systems, but an optimum balance between N oxides and greenhouse gas losses, N efficiency and crop yields requires the use of nitrification inhibitors (e.g., DMPP) with liquid organic sources.ETSI Agronomos Technical University of Madrid Ciudad UniversitariaFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinária de Jaboticabal Universidade Estadual Paulista—UNESPFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinária de Jaboticabal Universidade Estadual Paulista—UNESPCiudad UniversitariaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Guardia, GuillermoCangani, Max T. [UNESP]Sanz-Cobena, AlbertoJunior, J. Lucas [UNESP]Vallejo, Antonio2018-12-11T16:44:51Z2018-12-11T16:44:51Z2017-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article55-66application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.09.022Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 238, p. 55-66.0167-8809http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16919010.1016/j.agee.2016.09.0222-s2.0-850005802122-s2.0-85000580212.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment1,747info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-03T06:02:22Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169190Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T13:50:50.236562Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Management of pig manure to mitigate NO and yield-scaled N2O emissions in an irrigated Mediterranean crop |
title |
Management of pig manure to mitigate NO and yield-scaled N2O emissions in an irrigated Mediterranean crop |
spellingShingle |
Management of pig manure to mitigate NO and yield-scaled N2O emissions in an irrigated Mediterranean crop Guardia, Guillermo Compost GHG emissions Irrigation system Nitrification inhibitor Pig slurry |
title_short |
Management of pig manure to mitigate NO and yield-scaled N2O emissions in an irrigated Mediterranean crop |
title_full |
Management of pig manure to mitigate NO and yield-scaled N2O emissions in an irrigated Mediterranean crop |
title_fullStr |
Management of pig manure to mitigate NO and yield-scaled N2O emissions in an irrigated Mediterranean crop |
title_full_unstemmed |
Management of pig manure to mitigate NO and yield-scaled N2O emissions in an irrigated Mediterranean crop |
title_sort |
Management of pig manure to mitigate NO and yield-scaled N2O emissions in an irrigated Mediterranean crop |
author |
Guardia, Guillermo |
author_facet |
Guardia, Guillermo Cangani, Max T. [UNESP] Sanz-Cobena, Alberto Junior, J. Lucas [UNESP] Vallejo, Antonio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cangani, Max T. [UNESP] Sanz-Cobena, Alberto Junior, J. Lucas [UNESP] Vallejo, Antonio |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciudad Universitaria Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guardia, Guillermo Cangani, Max T. [UNESP] Sanz-Cobena, Alberto Junior, J. Lucas [UNESP] Vallejo, Antonio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Compost GHG emissions Irrigation system Nitrification inhibitor Pig slurry |
topic |
Compost GHG emissions Irrigation system Nitrification inhibitor Pig slurry |
description |
Substitution of conventional mineral fertilizers with organic sources can avoid the environmental problems associated with high concentrations of intensive livestock production in some Mediterranean areas. Some management practices, such as the use of nitrification inhibitors or more efficient irrigation techniques (e.g., drip irrigation), have been suggested as effective alternatives to mitigate nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) emissions released from soils amended with synthetic and organic fertilizers. In this experiment, we aimed to assess the effect of different organic amendments derived from pig manure (control without N fertilization (C); liquid fraction of pig slurry (LFPS); pig urine with the nitrification inhibitor 3,4 dimethylpyrazolephosphate (DMPP) (LFPSI); compost from the solid phase of pig slurry (COM)) compared to urea (U) and two different irrigation systems (the widespread sprinkler and alternative drip irrigation systems) on greenhouse gas (N2O, methane, CH4, and carbon dioxide, CO2) and NO emissions in a maize (Zea mays L.) crop. The effect of these treatments on crop yields and yield-scaled N2O emissions were also evaluated. The use of DMPP with LFPS was an effective practice to reduce N2O and NO losses (40 and 32% mitigation, respectively, compared to LFPS alone), and was also associated with the highest rates of CH4 oxidation. Drip irrigation significantly reduced the global warming potential (in spite of a lower CH4 sink) but increased the NO losses by 58%, as opposed to sprinkler irrigation. The higher biomass production and similar grain yields observed with drip irrigation resulted in lower yield-scaled N2O emissions in this treatment than in sprinkler irrigation. The use of organic fertilizers penalized grain yields compared to U (16–33%), although the differences were not significant in the case of LFPSI. Consequently, LFPSI in drip irrigation was (together with U applied by drip-fertigation) the treatment that led to the lowest yield-scaled N2O emissions. The use of organic N sources in irrigated maize is an environmentally advisable strategy in Mediterranean cropping systems, but an optimum balance between N oxides and greenhouse gas losses, N efficiency and crop yields requires the use of nitrification inhibitors (e.g., DMPP) with liquid organic sources. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-02-01 2018-12-11T16:44:51Z 2018-12-11T16:44:51Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.09.022 Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 238, p. 55-66. 0167-8809 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169190 10.1016/j.agee.2016.09.022 2-s2.0-85000580212 2-s2.0-85000580212.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.09.022 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169190 |
identifier_str_mv |
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 238, p. 55-66. 0167-8809 10.1016/j.agee.2016.09.022 2-s2.0-85000580212 2-s2.0-85000580212.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 1,747 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
55-66 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128283870494720 |