Effect of inhibitors and fertigation strategies on GHG emissions, NO fluxes and yield in irrigated maize

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guardia, Guillermo
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Cangani, Max T. [UNESP], Andreu, Gemma, Sanz-Cobena, Alberto, García-Marco, Sonia, Álvarez, José Manuel, Recio-Huetos, Jaime, Vallejo, Antonio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.009
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169371
Resumo: Abating large losses of nitrogen (N) oxides while maintaining or enhancing crop yield is a major goal in irrigated maize (Zea mays L) cropping areas. During two consecutive campaigns, the new nitrification inhibitor 2-(3,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl) succinic acid isomeric mixture (DMPSA) applied with calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and the same fertilizer applied by drip-fertigation without the inhibitor, were evaluated and compared with CAN broadcast to the surface and irrigated with sprinklers. Concurrently, urea-based treatments such as urea-fertigation and the broadcast application of urea combined with sprinkler irrigation, with or without the urease inhibitor N-butyl thiophosphorictriamide (NBPT), were also assessed. Nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) fluxes, grain and biomass yield and yield-scaled N2O emissions of the different treatments were compared. Additionally, methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes were measured. On average, fertigation treatments led to a mitigation of N2O emissions with respect to sprinkler irrigation by 80% and 78% for CAN and urea, respectively. With regards to inhibitor-based strategies, the use of DMPSA and NBPT reduced N2O losses by 58% and 51%, respectively, considering the average of both maize cropping seasons. Since no differences in grain yield were observed between fertilized treatments, DMPSA and fertigation treatments gave the lowest values of yield-scaled N2O emissions, leading to reductions of 63%, 71% and 78% for CAN with DMPSA, urea-fertigation and CAN-fertigation, respectively, with respect to conventional management strategies (surface broadcast application and sprinkler irrigation). Low NO emissions during the first campaign masked differences between treatments, whereas during the second season, NO losses significantly decreased in the following order: conventional treatments > inhibitors > fertigation. Comparing conventional management practices, CAN significantly decreased emissions of N oxides compared with urea, but this effect was only observed in the second maize cropping season. The moisture distribution pattern in drip plots (dry and wet areas) caused a reduction of CH4 sink (only in one of the two seasons) and respiration fluxes, in comparison to sprinkler. This study shows that the use of the new nitrification inhibitor DMPSA and drip-fertigation should be promoted in irrigated maize agro-ecosystems, in order to mitigate emissions of N oxides without penalizing grain yield and leading to similar or enhanced biomass production.
id UNSP_d634879d2cff050fb23c2190b392c8d5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169371
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effect of inhibitors and fertigation strategies on GHG emissions, NO fluxes and yield in irrigated maizeFertigationGHG emissionNitric oxide emissionNitrification inhibitor DMPSAUrease inhibitor NBPTAbating large losses of nitrogen (N) oxides while maintaining or enhancing crop yield is a major goal in irrigated maize (Zea mays L) cropping areas. During two consecutive campaigns, the new nitrification inhibitor 2-(3,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl) succinic acid isomeric mixture (DMPSA) applied with calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and the same fertilizer applied by drip-fertigation without the inhibitor, were evaluated and compared with CAN broadcast to the surface and irrigated with sprinklers. Concurrently, urea-based treatments such as urea-fertigation and the broadcast application of urea combined with sprinkler irrigation, with or without the urease inhibitor N-butyl thiophosphorictriamide (NBPT), were also assessed. Nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) fluxes, grain and biomass yield and yield-scaled N2O emissions of the different treatments were compared. Additionally, methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes were measured. On average, fertigation treatments led to a mitigation of N2O emissions with respect to sprinkler irrigation by 80% and 78% for CAN and urea, respectively. With regards to inhibitor-based strategies, the use of DMPSA and NBPT reduced N2O losses by 58% and 51%, respectively, considering the average of both maize cropping seasons. Since no differences in grain yield were observed between fertilized treatments, DMPSA and fertigation treatments gave the lowest values of yield-scaled N2O emissions, leading to reductions of 63%, 71% and 78% for CAN with DMPSA, urea-fertigation and CAN-fertigation, respectively, with respect to conventional management strategies (surface broadcast application and sprinkler irrigation). Low NO emissions during the first campaign masked differences between treatments, whereas during the second season, NO losses significantly decreased in the following order: conventional treatments > inhibitors > fertigation. Comparing conventional management practices, CAN significantly decreased emissions of N oxides compared with urea, but this effect was only observed in the second maize cropping season. The moisture distribution pattern in drip plots (dry and wet areas) caused a reduction of CH4 sink (only in one of the two seasons) and respiration fluxes, in comparison to sprinkler. This study shows that the use of the new nitrification inhibitor DMPSA and drip-fertigation should be promoted in irrigated maize agro-ecosystems, in order to mitigate emissions of N oxides without penalizing grain yield and leading to similar or enhanced biomass production.ETSI Agronómica Alimentaria y de Biosistemas (ETSIAAB) Technical University of Madrid (UPM) Ciudad UniversitariaFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinária de Jaboticabal Universidade Estadual Paulista—UNESPFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinária de Jaboticabal Universidade Estadual Paulista—UNESPCiudad UniversitariaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Guardia, GuillermoCangani, Max T. [UNESP]Andreu, GemmaSanz-Cobena, AlbertoGarcía-Marco, SoniaÁlvarez, José ManuelRecio-Huetos, JaimeVallejo, Antonio2018-12-11T16:45:34Z2018-12-11T16:45:34Z2017-03-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article135-145application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.009Field Crops Research, v. 204, p. 135-145.0378-4290http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16937110.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.0092-s2.0-850098575962-s2.0-85009857596.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengField Crops Research1,474info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-21T06:04:30Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169371Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:30:19.051310Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of inhibitors and fertigation strategies on GHG emissions, NO fluxes and yield in irrigated maize
title Effect of inhibitors and fertigation strategies on GHG emissions, NO fluxes and yield in irrigated maize
spellingShingle Effect of inhibitors and fertigation strategies on GHG emissions, NO fluxes and yield in irrigated maize
Guardia, Guillermo
Fertigation
GHG emission
Nitric oxide emission
Nitrification inhibitor DMPSA
Urease inhibitor NBPT
title_short Effect of inhibitors and fertigation strategies on GHG emissions, NO fluxes and yield in irrigated maize
title_full Effect of inhibitors and fertigation strategies on GHG emissions, NO fluxes and yield in irrigated maize
title_fullStr Effect of inhibitors and fertigation strategies on GHG emissions, NO fluxes and yield in irrigated maize
title_full_unstemmed Effect of inhibitors and fertigation strategies on GHG emissions, NO fluxes and yield in irrigated maize
title_sort Effect of inhibitors and fertigation strategies on GHG emissions, NO fluxes and yield in irrigated maize
author Guardia, Guillermo
author_facet Guardia, Guillermo
Cangani, Max T. [UNESP]
Andreu, Gemma
Sanz-Cobena, Alberto
García-Marco, Sonia
Álvarez, José Manuel
Recio-Huetos, Jaime
Vallejo, Antonio
author_role author
author2 Cangani, Max T. [UNESP]
Andreu, Gemma
Sanz-Cobena, Alberto
García-Marco, Sonia
Álvarez, José Manuel
Recio-Huetos, Jaime
Vallejo, Antonio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Ciudad Universitaria
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guardia, Guillermo
Cangani, Max T. [UNESP]
Andreu, Gemma
Sanz-Cobena, Alberto
García-Marco, Sonia
Álvarez, José Manuel
Recio-Huetos, Jaime
Vallejo, Antonio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fertigation
GHG emission
Nitric oxide emission
Nitrification inhibitor DMPSA
Urease inhibitor NBPT
topic Fertigation
GHG emission
Nitric oxide emission
Nitrification inhibitor DMPSA
Urease inhibitor NBPT
description Abating large losses of nitrogen (N) oxides while maintaining or enhancing crop yield is a major goal in irrigated maize (Zea mays L) cropping areas. During two consecutive campaigns, the new nitrification inhibitor 2-(3,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl) succinic acid isomeric mixture (DMPSA) applied with calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and the same fertilizer applied by drip-fertigation without the inhibitor, were evaluated and compared with CAN broadcast to the surface and irrigated with sprinklers. Concurrently, urea-based treatments such as urea-fertigation and the broadcast application of urea combined with sprinkler irrigation, with or without the urease inhibitor N-butyl thiophosphorictriamide (NBPT), were also assessed. Nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) fluxes, grain and biomass yield and yield-scaled N2O emissions of the different treatments were compared. Additionally, methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes were measured. On average, fertigation treatments led to a mitigation of N2O emissions with respect to sprinkler irrigation by 80% and 78% for CAN and urea, respectively. With regards to inhibitor-based strategies, the use of DMPSA and NBPT reduced N2O losses by 58% and 51%, respectively, considering the average of both maize cropping seasons. Since no differences in grain yield were observed between fertilized treatments, DMPSA and fertigation treatments gave the lowest values of yield-scaled N2O emissions, leading to reductions of 63%, 71% and 78% for CAN with DMPSA, urea-fertigation and CAN-fertigation, respectively, with respect to conventional management strategies (surface broadcast application and sprinkler irrigation). Low NO emissions during the first campaign masked differences between treatments, whereas during the second season, NO losses significantly decreased in the following order: conventional treatments > inhibitors > fertigation. Comparing conventional management practices, CAN significantly decreased emissions of N oxides compared with urea, but this effect was only observed in the second maize cropping season. The moisture distribution pattern in drip plots (dry and wet areas) caused a reduction of CH4 sink (only in one of the two seasons) and respiration fluxes, in comparison to sprinkler. This study shows that the use of the new nitrification inhibitor DMPSA and drip-fertigation should be promoted in irrigated maize agro-ecosystems, in order to mitigate emissions of N oxides without penalizing grain yield and leading to similar or enhanced biomass production.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-15
2018-12-11T16:45:34Z
2018-12-11T16:45:34Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.009
Field Crops Research, v. 204, p. 135-145.
0378-4290
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169371
10.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.009
2-s2.0-85009857596
2-s2.0-85009857596.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.009
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169371
identifier_str_mv Field Crops Research, v. 204, p. 135-145.
0378-4290
10.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.009
2-s2.0-85009857596
2-s2.0-85009857596.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Field Crops Research
1,474
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 135-145
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128522406854656