Cytotoxic potential of denture base and reline acrylic resins after immersion in disinfectant solutions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Masetti, Paula [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Arbeláez, Maria Isabel Amaya [UNESP], Pavarina, Ana Claudia [UNESP], Sanitá, Paula Volpato [UNESP], Jorge, Janaina Habib [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.001
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/179832
Resumo: Statement of problem: The daily immersion of dentures in disinfectant solutions can cause the incorporation of toxic substances in the acrylic resins, and studies evaluating the cumulative effect of disinfectant solutions on cell culture are lacking. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the cytotoxic potential of cell cultures of denture base and reline acrylic resins after immersion in disinfectant solutions. Material and methods: Disk-shaped specimens (14×1.2 mm) were obtained and divided into groups (n=9) according to the disinfectant solutions (distilled water [control], 2% chlorhexidine digluconate, 3.8% sodium perborate, 0.5% sodium hypochlorite, and apple vinegar) and to the storage period (0, 1, 3, and 6 months). Solutions were changed daily. After the different storage periods, specimens were immersed in culture medium for 24 hours, and extracts were obtained. Human keratinocytes were cultivated, and the cellular metabolism was evaluated by using Alamar Blue. Data were submitted to 3-way analysis of variance and Games-Howell post hoc tests (α=.05). Results: Both of the acrylic resins tested showed similar biocompatibility properties after immersion in different solutions (P=.400). Immersion in distilled water, 3.8% sodium perborate, and 0.5% sodium hypochlorite did not affect the cellular metabolism of the keratinocytes (P>.05), regardless of the immersion period and the type of acrylic resin (P>.05). Immersion in 2% chlorhexidine digluconate or apple vinegar resulted in high cytotoxicity over time, until the third month (P<.05), after which no changes were observed (P>.05). Conclusions: The type of acrylic resin (base or reline) had no significant effect on the viability of cells. Vinegar and chlorhexidine digluconate solutions increased in cytotoxic effect over time, and were strongly cytotoxic after 6 months of immersion. Sodium perborate and sodium hypochlorite were noncytotoxic in all periods of time tested.
id UNSP_98c10e307aeb8834bf60a6aa7cd76e71
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/179832
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Cytotoxic potential of denture base and reline acrylic resins after immersion in disinfectant solutionsStatement of problem: The daily immersion of dentures in disinfectant solutions can cause the incorporation of toxic substances in the acrylic resins, and studies evaluating the cumulative effect of disinfectant solutions on cell culture are lacking. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the cytotoxic potential of cell cultures of denture base and reline acrylic resins after immersion in disinfectant solutions. Material and methods: Disk-shaped specimens (14×1.2 mm) were obtained and divided into groups (n=9) according to the disinfectant solutions (distilled water [control], 2% chlorhexidine digluconate, 3.8% sodium perborate, 0.5% sodium hypochlorite, and apple vinegar) and to the storage period (0, 1, 3, and 6 months). Solutions were changed daily. After the different storage periods, specimens were immersed in culture medium for 24 hours, and extracts were obtained. Human keratinocytes were cultivated, and the cellular metabolism was evaluated by using Alamar Blue. Data were submitted to 3-way analysis of variance and Games-Howell post hoc tests (α=.05). Results: Both of the acrylic resins tested showed similar biocompatibility properties after immersion in different solutions (P=.400). Immersion in distilled water, 3.8% sodium perborate, and 0.5% sodium hypochlorite did not affect the cellular metabolism of the keratinocytes (P>.05), regardless of the immersion period and the type of acrylic resin (P>.05). Immersion in 2% chlorhexidine digluconate or apple vinegar resulted in high cytotoxicity over time, until the third month (P<.05), after which no changes were observed (P>.05). Conclusions: The type of acrylic resin (base or reline) had no significant effect on the viability of cells. Vinegar and chlorhexidine digluconate solutions increased in cytotoxic effect over time, and were strongly cytotoxic after 6 months of immersion. Sodium perborate and sodium hypochlorite were noncytotoxic in all periods of time tested.Postgraduate student Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Postgraduate student Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Masetti, Paula [UNESP]Arbeláez, Maria Isabel Amaya [UNESP]Pavarina, Ana Claudia [UNESP]Sanitá, Paula Volpato [UNESP]Jorge, Janaina Habib [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:36:56Z2018-12-11T17:36:56Z2018-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article155.e1-155.e7application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.001Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 120, n. 1, p. 155.e1-155.e7, 2018.0022-3913http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17983210.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.0012-s2.0-850463442982-s2.0-85046344298.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry1,087info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-02T06:14:32Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/179832Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-02T06:14:32Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cytotoxic potential of denture base and reline acrylic resins after immersion in disinfectant solutions
title Cytotoxic potential of denture base and reline acrylic resins after immersion in disinfectant solutions
spellingShingle Cytotoxic potential of denture base and reline acrylic resins after immersion in disinfectant solutions
Masetti, Paula [UNESP]
title_short Cytotoxic potential of denture base and reline acrylic resins after immersion in disinfectant solutions
title_full Cytotoxic potential of denture base and reline acrylic resins after immersion in disinfectant solutions
title_fullStr Cytotoxic potential of denture base and reline acrylic resins after immersion in disinfectant solutions
title_full_unstemmed Cytotoxic potential of denture base and reline acrylic resins after immersion in disinfectant solutions
title_sort Cytotoxic potential of denture base and reline acrylic resins after immersion in disinfectant solutions
author Masetti, Paula [UNESP]
author_facet Masetti, Paula [UNESP]
Arbeláez, Maria Isabel Amaya [UNESP]
Pavarina, Ana Claudia [UNESP]
Sanitá, Paula Volpato [UNESP]
Jorge, Janaina Habib [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Arbeláez, Maria Isabel Amaya [UNESP]
Pavarina, Ana Claudia [UNESP]
Sanitá, Paula Volpato [UNESP]
Jorge, Janaina Habib [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Masetti, Paula [UNESP]
Arbeláez, Maria Isabel Amaya [UNESP]
Pavarina, Ana Claudia [UNESP]
Sanitá, Paula Volpato [UNESP]
Jorge, Janaina Habib [UNESP]
description Statement of problem: The daily immersion of dentures in disinfectant solutions can cause the incorporation of toxic substances in the acrylic resins, and studies evaluating the cumulative effect of disinfectant solutions on cell culture are lacking. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the cytotoxic potential of cell cultures of denture base and reline acrylic resins after immersion in disinfectant solutions. Material and methods: Disk-shaped specimens (14×1.2 mm) were obtained and divided into groups (n=9) according to the disinfectant solutions (distilled water [control], 2% chlorhexidine digluconate, 3.8% sodium perborate, 0.5% sodium hypochlorite, and apple vinegar) and to the storage period (0, 1, 3, and 6 months). Solutions were changed daily. After the different storage periods, specimens were immersed in culture medium for 24 hours, and extracts were obtained. Human keratinocytes were cultivated, and the cellular metabolism was evaluated by using Alamar Blue. Data were submitted to 3-way analysis of variance and Games-Howell post hoc tests (α=.05). Results: Both of the acrylic resins tested showed similar biocompatibility properties after immersion in different solutions (P=.400). Immersion in distilled water, 3.8% sodium perborate, and 0.5% sodium hypochlorite did not affect the cellular metabolism of the keratinocytes (P>.05), regardless of the immersion period and the type of acrylic resin (P>.05). Immersion in 2% chlorhexidine digluconate or apple vinegar resulted in high cytotoxicity over time, until the third month (P<.05), after which no changes were observed (P>.05). Conclusions: The type of acrylic resin (base or reline) had no significant effect on the viability of cells. Vinegar and chlorhexidine digluconate solutions increased in cytotoxic effect over time, and were strongly cytotoxic after 6 months of immersion. Sodium perborate and sodium hypochlorite were noncytotoxic in all periods of time tested.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11T17:36:56Z
2018-12-11T17:36:56Z
2018-07-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.001
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 120, n. 1, p. 155.e1-155.e7, 2018.
0022-3913
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/179832
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.001
2-s2.0-85046344298
2-s2.0-85046344298.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.001
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/179832
identifier_str_mv Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 120, n. 1, p. 155.e1-155.e7, 2018.
0022-3913
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.001
2-s2.0-85046344298
2-s2.0-85046344298.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
1,087
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 155.e1-155.e7
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965145695256576