Prevalence and factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction in university women: a cross-sectional study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Iamundo, Luana Fávaro [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: de Aquino Nava, Guilherme Thomaz [UNESP], Rocha, Paulo Roberto, Prudencio, Caroline Baldini [UNESP], Barbosa, Angélica Mércia Pascon [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/fm.2022.35133
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/245924
Resumo: Introduction: Urinary incontinence (UI), fecal incontinence (FI), and genito-pelvic pain or penetration disorder (GPPPD) are considered pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), and are mainly characterized by poor functionality of the pelvic floor muscles. Despite the relevance of these dysfunctions in women's lives, the demand for care is low. Objective: To analyze the prevalence of PFD, in university women, and factors associated with PFD. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted at São Paulo State University, Marília, SP, Brazil, with undergraduate and/ or postgraduate women aged over 18 years. An online questionnaire containing 40 open and multiple-choice questions about PFD was developed by the authors and a Google form was disclosed via social media (Facebook, Instagram) to the participants. The questionnaire was applied between April and July 2020. Results: A sample of 707 participants was included. The average age was 22.5 ± 21.0 years old. The most prevalent PFD was GPPPD, reported by 30.7% of women, followed by UI (16.8%) and FI (3.2%). PFD was significant less reported in the Midwest region compared to other regions (p = 0.015) and significantly more prevalent in women who attended public university (p = 0.038), in women with UI, FI, and GPPPD. The association-test showed that attending public university showed association to UI (p < 0.001), FI (p = 0.008) and GPPPD (p = 0.006). In addition, parity showed association with GPPD (p = 0.032) and to attend health courses with UI (p = 0.002). Conclusion: PFD is prevalent among university women and GPPPD was the most recurrent, followed by UI and FI. GPPPD was associated with parity and attending a public university. UI was associated with attending public university and health courses. FI was associated with attending a public university
id UNSP_9c83187f9c902e0006a862cb99c37749
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/245924
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Prevalence and factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction in university women: a cross-sectional studyPrevalência e fatores associados à disfunção do assoalho pélvico em mulheres universitárias: um estudo transversalPelvic floor disordersPhysiological sexual dysfunctionUniversityUrinary incontinenceIntroduction: Urinary incontinence (UI), fecal incontinence (FI), and genito-pelvic pain or penetration disorder (GPPPD) are considered pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), and are mainly characterized by poor functionality of the pelvic floor muscles. Despite the relevance of these dysfunctions in women's lives, the demand for care is low. Objective: To analyze the prevalence of PFD, in university women, and factors associated with PFD. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted at São Paulo State University, Marília, SP, Brazil, with undergraduate and/ or postgraduate women aged over 18 years. An online questionnaire containing 40 open and multiple-choice questions about PFD was developed by the authors and a Google form was disclosed via social media (Facebook, Instagram) to the participants. The questionnaire was applied between April and July 2020. Results: A sample of 707 participants was included. The average age was 22.5 ± 21.0 years old. The most prevalent PFD was GPPPD, reported by 30.7% of women, followed by UI (16.8%) and FI (3.2%). PFD was significant less reported in the Midwest region compared to other regions (p = 0.015) and significantly more prevalent in women who attended public university (p = 0.038), in women with UI, FI, and GPPPD. The association-test showed that attending public university showed association to UI (p < 0.001), FI (p = 0.008) and GPPPD (p = 0.006). In addition, parity showed association with GPPD (p = 0.032) and to attend health courses with UI (p = 0.002). Conclusion: PFD is prevalent among university women and GPPPD was the most recurrent, followed by UI and FI. GPPPD was associated with parity and attending a public university. UI was associated with attending public university and health courses. FI was associated with attending a public universityFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SPCentro Universitário de Adamantina (UNIFAI), SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SPFAPESP: 2016/01743-5Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Centro Universitário de Adamantina (UNIFAI)Iamundo, Luana Fávaro [UNESP]de Aquino Nava, Guilherme Thomaz [UNESP]Rocha, Paulo RobertoPrudencio, Caroline Baldini [UNESP]Barbosa, Angélica Mércia Pascon [UNESP]2023-07-29T12:26:59Z2023-07-29T12:26:59Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/fm.2022.35133Fisioterapia em Movimento, v. 35.1980-5918http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24592410.1590/fm.2022.351332-s2.0-85138209263Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengporFisioterapia em Movimentoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-29T12:26:59Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/245924Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-07-29T12:26:59Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prevalence and factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction in university women: a cross-sectional study
Prevalência e fatores associados à disfunção do assoalho pélvico em mulheres universitárias: um estudo transversal
title Prevalence and factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction in university women: a cross-sectional study
spellingShingle Prevalence and factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction in university women: a cross-sectional study
Iamundo, Luana Fávaro [UNESP]
Pelvic floor disorders
Physiological sexual dysfunction
University
Urinary incontinence
title_short Prevalence and factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction in university women: a cross-sectional study
title_full Prevalence and factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction in university women: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Prevalence and factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction in university women: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction in university women: a cross-sectional study
title_sort Prevalence and factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction in university women: a cross-sectional study
author Iamundo, Luana Fávaro [UNESP]
author_facet Iamundo, Luana Fávaro [UNESP]
de Aquino Nava, Guilherme Thomaz [UNESP]
Rocha, Paulo Roberto
Prudencio, Caroline Baldini [UNESP]
Barbosa, Angélica Mércia Pascon [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 de Aquino Nava, Guilherme Thomaz [UNESP]
Rocha, Paulo Roberto
Prudencio, Caroline Baldini [UNESP]
Barbosa, Angélica Mércia Pascon [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Centro Universitário de Adamantina (UNIFAI)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Iamundo, Luana Fávaro [UNESP]
de Aquino Nava, Guilherme Thomaz [UNESP]
Rocha, Paulo Roberto
Prudencio, Caroline Baldini [UNESP]
Barbosa, Angélica Mércia Pascon [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pelvic floor disorders
Physiological sexual dysfunction
University
Urinary incontinence
topic Pelvic floor disorders
Physiological sexual dysfunction
University
Urinary incontinence
description Introduction: Urinary incontinence (UI), fecal incontinence (FI), and genito-pelvic pain or penetration disorder (GPPPD) are considered pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), and are mainly characterized by poor functionality of the pelvic floor muscles. Despite the relevance of these dysfunctions in women's lives, the demand for care is low. Objective: To analyze the prevalence of PFD, in university women, and factors associated with PFD. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted at São Paulo State University, Marília, SP, Brazil, with undergraduate and/ or postgraduate women aged over 18 years. An online questionnaire containing 40 open and multiple-choice questions about PFD was developed by the authors and a Google form was disclosed via social media (Facebook, Instagram) to the participants. The questionnaire was applied between April and July 2020. Results: A sample of 707 participants was included. The average age was 22.5 ± 21.0 years old. The most prevalent PFD was GPPPD, reported by 30.7% of women, followed by UI (16.8%) and FI (3.2%). PFD was significant less reported in the Midwest region compared to other regions (p = 0.015) and significantly more prevalent in women who attended public university (p = 0.038), in women with UI, FI, and GPPPD. The association-test showed that attending public university showed association to UI (p < 0.001), FI (p = 0.008) and GPPPD (p = 0.006). In addition, parity showed association with GPPD (p = 0.032) and to attend health courses with UI (p = 0.002). Conclusion: PFD is prevalent among university women and GPPPD was the most recurrent, followed by UI and FI. GPPPD was associated with parity and attending a public university. UI was associated with attending public university and health courses. FI was associated with attending a public university
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
2023-07-29T12:26:59Z
2023-07-29T12:26:59Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/fm.2022.35133
Fisioterapia em Movimento, v. 35.
1980-5918
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/245924
10.1590/fm.2022.35133
2-s2.0-85138209263
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/fm.2022.35133
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/245924
identifier_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento, v. 35.
1980-5918
10.1590/fm.2022.35133
2-s2.0-85138209263
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965537208369152