Do fallow in the off-season and crop succession promote differences in soil aggregation in no-tillage systems?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Mariele Monique Honorato [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Coelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP], Silva, Matheus Flavio da [UNESP], Fernandes, Carolina [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115725
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234046
Resumo: The no-tillage (NT) system is an agricultural practice that stands out the most within conservation agriculture. Conservation agriculture is based on three principles: soil tillage that is limited to the sowing row, crop rotation, and soil surface cover throughout the year (>30%). Despite these principles, the maintenance of soil cover throughout the year and crop rotation are commonly neglected, which can promote changes in soil aggregation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of fallow in the off-season, and two crop successions (grass/grass and grass/legume), on soil aggregation in NT systems. The study was conducted in five fields with different land uses for more than 10 years in southeastern Brazil. Three land uses under NT, all sown with maize within the season, were used, yielding three groups: NT with fallow in the off-season (NT-f), NT with legumes (brown hemp) in the off-season (NT-l), and NT with maize in the off-season (NT-g). For comparison, we considered forest land (F) as a conservation reference for soil aggregation and land being used under conventional tillage (CT) as a low-conservation system. The soil variable that contributed the most to the separation of land use was the mineral-associated organic carbon content. The absence of soil surface cover throughout the year in an NT system is as harmful to soil aggregation as a CT system. Moreover, succession promotes differences in soil aggregation, with grass-grass succession (NT-g) leading to higher particulate organic carbon content and aggregate stability index in some soil layers compared to the NT-l. Here, we demonstrate that conservation agriculture practices, such as NT, require a system-centered approach to improve soil conditions. We also found that fallow in the off-season promotes an NT system with low soil conservation.
id UNSP_9d3eb45cdbf720caea01fd953d6cfd5b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/234046
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Do fallow in the off-season and crop succession promote differences in soil aggregation in no-tillage systems?Conservation systemsConventional soil tillage systemDiscriminant analysisOrganic carbonThe no-tillage (NT) system is an agricultural practice that stands out the most within conservation agriculture. Conservation agriculture is based on three principles: soil tillage that is limited to the sowing row, crop rotation, and soil surface cover throughout the year (>30%). Despite these principles, the maintenance of soil cover throughout the year and crop rotation are commonly neglected, which can promote changes in soil aggregation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of fallow in the off-season, and two crop successions (grass/grass and grass/legume), on soil aggregation in NT systems. The study was conducted in five fields with different land uses for more than 10 years in southeastern Brazil. Three land uses under NT, all sown with maize within the season, were used, yielding three groups: NT with fallow in the off-season (NT-f), NT with legumes (brown hemp) in the off-season (NT-l), and NT with maize in the off-season (NT-g). For comparison, we considered forest land (F) as a conservation reference for soil aggregation and land being used under conventional tillage (CT) as a low-conservation system. The soil variable that contributed the most to the separation of land use was the mineral-associated organic carbon content. The absence of soil surface cover throughout the year in an NT system is as harmful to soil aggregation as a CT system. Moreover, succession promotes differences in soil aggregation, with grass-grass succession (NT-g) leading to higher particulate organic carbon content and aggregate stability index in some soil layers compared to the NT-l. Here, we demonstrate that conservation agriculture practices, such as NT, require a system-centered approach to improve soil conditions. We also found that fallow in the off-season promotes an NT system with low soil conservation.São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, JaboticabalSão Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, JaboticabalUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Fernandes, Mariele Monique Honorato [UNESP]Coelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP]Silva, Matheus Flavio da [UNESP]Fernandes, Carolina [UNESP]2022-05-01T12:56:29Z2022-05-01T12:56:29Z2022-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115725Geoderma, v. 412.0016-7061http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23404610.1016/j.geoderma.2022.1157252-s2.0-85123396563Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengGeodermainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T14:24:20Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/234046Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:18:38.435394Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Do fallow in the off-season and crop succession promote differences in soil aggregation in no-tillage systems?
title Do fallow in the off-season and crop succession promote differences in soil aggregation in no-tillage systems?
spellingShingle Do fallow in the off-season and crop succession promote differences in soil aggregation in no-tillage systems?
Fernandes, Mariele Monique Honorato [UNESP]
Conservation systems
Conventional soil tillage system
Discriminant analysis
Organic carbon
title_short Do fallow in the off-season and crop succession promote differences in soil aggregation in no-tillage systems?
title_full Do fallow in the off-season and crop succession promote differences in soil aggregation in no-tillage systems?
title_fullStr Do fallow in the off-season and crop succession promote differences in soil aggregation in no-tillage systems?
title_full_unstemmed Do fallow in the off-season and crop succession promote differences in soil aggregation in no-tillage systems?
title_sort Do fallow in the off-season and crop succession promote differences in soil aggregation in no-tillage systems?
author Fernandes, Mariele Monique Honorato [UNESP]
author_facet Fernandes, Mariele Monique Honorato [UNESP]
Coelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP]
Silva, Matheus Flavio da [UNESP]
Fernandes, Carolina [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Coelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP]
Silva, Matheus Flavio da [UNESP]
Fernandes, Carolina [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Mariele Monique Honorato [UNESP]
Coelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP]
Silva, Matheus Flavio da [UNESP]
Fernandes, Carolina [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Conservation systems
Conventional soil tillage system
Discriminant analysis
Organic carbon
topic Conservation systems
Conventional soil tillage system
Discriminant analysis
Organic carbon
description The no-tillage (NT) system is an agricultural practice that stands out the most within conservation agriculture. Conservation agriculture is based on three principles: soil tillage that is limited to the sowing row, crop rotation, and soil surface cover throughout the year (>30%). Despite these principles, the maintenance of soil cover throughout the year and crop rotation are commonly neglected, which can promote changes in soil aggregation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of fallow in the off-season, and two crop successions (grass/grass and grass/legume), on soil aggregation in NT systems. The study was conducted in five fields with different land uses for more than 10 years in southeastern Brazil. Three land uses under NT, all sown with maize within the season, were used, yielding three groups: NT with fallow in the off-season (NT-f), NT with legumes (brown hemp) in the off-season (NT-l), and NT with maize in the off-season (NT-g). For comparison, we considered forest land (F) as a conservation reference for soil aggregation and land being used under conventional tillage (CT) as a low-conservation system. The soil variable that contributed the most to the separation of land use was the mineral-associated organic carbon content. The absence of soil surface cover throughout the year in an NT system is as harmful to soil aggregation as a CT system. Moreover, succession promotes differences in soil aggregation, with grass-grass succession (NT-g) leading to higher particulate organic carbon content and aggregate stability index in some soil layers compared to the NT-l. Here, we demonstrate that conservation agriculture practices, such as NT, require a system-centered approach to improve soil conditions. We also found that fallow in the off-season promotes an NT system with low soil conservation.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-01T12:56:29Z
2022-05-01T12:56:29Z
2022-04-15
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115725
Geoderma, v. 412.
0016-7061
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234046
10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115725
2-s2.0-85123396563
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115725
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234046
identifier_str_mv Geoderma, v. 412.
0016-7061
10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115725
2-s2.0-85123396563
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Geoderma
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129506043494400