Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/176563 |
Resumo: | Objective: The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the recommendations regarding the diagnosis and treatment contained in current clinical practice guidelines for patients with non-specific low back pain in primary care. We also aimed to examine how recommendations have changed since our last overview in 2010. Method: The searches for clinical practice guidelines were performed for the period from 2008 to 2017 in electronic databases. Guidelines including information regarding either the diagnosis or treatment of non-specific low back pain, and targeted at a multidisciplinary audience in the primary care setting, were considered eligible. We extracted data regarding recommendations for diagnosis and treatment, and methods for development of guidelines. Results: We identified 15 clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care. For diagnosis of patients with non-specific low back pain, the clinical practice guidelines recommend history taking and physical examination to identify red flags, neurological testing to identify radicular syndrome, use of imaging if serious pathology is suspected (but discourage routine use), and assessment of psychosocial factors. For treatment of patients with acute low back pain, the guidelines recommend reassurance on the favourable prognosis and advice on returning to normal activities, avoiding bed rest, the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and weak opioids for short periods. For treatment of patients with chronic low back pain, the guidelines recommend the use of NSAIDs and antidepressants, exercise therapy, and psychosocial interventions. In addition, referral to a specialist is recommended in case of suspicion of specific pathologies or radiculopathy or if there is no improvement after 4 weeks. While there were a few discrepancies across the current clinical practice guidelines, a substantial proportion of recommendations was consistently endorsed. In the current review, we identified some differences compared to the previous overview regarding the recommendations for assessment of psychosocial factors, the use of some medications (e.g., paracetamol) as well as an increasing amount of information regarding the types of exercise, mode of delivery, acupuncture, herbal medicines, and invasive treatments. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.] |
id |
UNSP_9d8e7fc7c8875ac916d4ae1677efda82 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/176563 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overviewClinical guidelinesDiagnosisLow back painTreatmentObjective: The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the recommendations regarding the diagnosis and treatment contained in current clinical practice guidelines for patients with non-specific low back pain in primary care. We also aimed to examine how recommendations have changed since our last overview in 2010. Method: The searches for clinical practice guidelines were performed for the period from 2008 to 2017 in electronic databases. Guidelines including information regarding either the diagnosis or treatment of non-specific low back pain, and targeted at a multidisciplinary audience in the primary care setting, were considered eligible. We extracted data regarding recommendations for diagnosis and treatment, and methods for development of guidelines. Results: We identified 15 clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care. For diagnosis of patients with non-specific low back pain, the clinical practice guidelines recommend history taking and physical examination to identify red flags, neurological testing to identify radicular syndrome, use of imaging if serious pathology is suspected (but discourage routine use), and assessment of psychosocial factors. For treatment of patients with acute low back pain, the guidelines recommend reassurance on the favourable prognosis and advice on returning to normal activities, avoiding bed rest, the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and weak opioids for short periods. For treatment of patients with chronic low back pain, the guidelines recommend the use of NSAIDs and antidepressants, exercise therapy, and psychosocial interventions. In addition, referral to a specialist is recommended in case of suspicion of specific pathologies or radiculopathy or if there is no improvement after 4 weeks. While there were a few discrepancies across the current clinical practice guidelines, a substantial proportion of recommendations was consistently endorsed. In the current review, we identified some differences compared to the previous overview regarding the recommendations for assessment of psychosocial factors, the use of some medications (e.g., paracetamol) as well as an increasing amount of information regarding the types of exercise, mode of delivery, acupuncture, herbal medicines, and invasive treatments. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.]Departamento de Fisioterapia Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Sydney School of Public Health Faculty of Medicine and Health University of SydneyInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health Sydney Local Health DistrictDepartment of Physical Therapy Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)Department of General Practice Institute for Community Medicine University Medicine GreifswaldDepartment of Health Sciences Faculty of Sciences and Amsterdam Movement Sciences Institute Vrije UniversiteitDepartment of General Practice Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040Center for Muscle and Health University of Southern DenmarkDepartamento de Fisioterapia Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)University of SydneySydney Local Health DistrictUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)University Medicine GreifswaldVrije UniversiteitErasmus Medical CenterUniversity of Southern DenmarkOliveira, Crystian B. [UNESP]Maher, Chris G.Pinto, Rafael Z.Traeger, Adrian C.Lin, Chung-Wei ChristineChenot, Jean-Françoisvan Tulder, MauritsKoes, Bart W.2018-12-11T17:21:22Z2018-12-11T17:21:22Z2018-07-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1-13application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2European Spine Journal, p. 1-13.1432-09320940-6719http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17656310.1007/s00586-018-5673-22-s2.0-850495667472-s2.0-85049566747.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEuropean Spine Journal1,5351,535info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-18T18:44:28Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/176563Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:23:32.292973Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview |
title |
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview |
spellingShingle |
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview Oliveira, Crystian B. [UNESP] Clinical guidelines Diagnosis Low back pain Treatment |
title_short |
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview |
title_full |
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview |
title_fullStr |
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview |
title_sort |
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview |
author |
Oliveira, Crystian B. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Crystian B. [UNESP] Maher, Chris G. Pinto, Rafael Z. Traeger, Adrian C. Lin, Chung-Wei Christine Chenot, Jean-François van Tulder, Maurits Koes, Bart W. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Maher, Chris G. Pinto, Rafael Z. Traeger, Adrian C. Lin, Chung-Wei Christine Chenot, Jean-François van Tulder, Maurits Koes, Bart W. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) University of Sydney Sydney Local Health District Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) University Medicine Greifswald Vrije Universiteit Erasmus Medical Center University of Southern Denmark |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Crystian B. [UNESP] Maher, Chris G. Pinto, Rafael Z. Traeger, Adrian C. Lin, Chung-Wei Christine Chenot, Jean-François van Tulder, Maurits Koes, Bart W. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Clinical guidelines Diagnosis Low back pain Treatment |
topic |
Clinical guidelines Diagnosis Low back pain Treatment |
description |
Objective: The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the recommendations regarding the diagnosis and treatment contained in current clinical practice guidelines for patients with non-specific low back pain in primary care. We also aimed to examine how recommendations have changed since our last overview in 2010. Method: The searches for clinical practice guidelines were performed for the period from 2008 to 2017 in electronic databases. Guidelines including information regarding either the diagnosis or treatment of non-specific low back pain, and targeted at a multidisciplinary audience in the primary care setting, were considered eligible. We extracted data regarding recommendations for diagnosis and treatment, and methods for development of guidelines. Results: We identified 15 clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care. For diagnosis of patients with non-specific low back pain, the clinical practice guidelines recommend history taking and physical examination to identify red flags, neurological testing to identify radicular syndrome, use of imaging if serious pathology is suspected (but discourage routine use), and assessment of psychosocial factors. For treatment of patients with acute low back pain, the guidelines recommend reassurance on the favourable prognosis and advice on returning to normal activities, avoiding bed rest, the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and weak opioids for short periods. For treatment of patients with chronic low back pain, the guidelines recommend the use of NSAIDs and antidepressants, exercise therapy, and psychosocial interventions. In addition, referral to a specialist is recommended in case of suspicion of specific pathologies or radiculopathy or if there is no improvement after 4 weeks. While there were a few discrepancies across the current clinical practice guidelines, a substantial proportion of recommendations was consistently endorsed. In the current review, we identified some differences compared to the previous overview regarding the recommendations for assessment of psychosocial factors, the use of some medications (e.g., paracetamol) as well as an increasing amount of information regarding the types of exercise, mode of delivery, acupuncture, herbal medicines, and invasive treatments. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.] |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-11T17:21:22Z 2018-12-11T17:21:22Z 2018-07-03 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2 European Spine Journal, p. 1-13. 1432-0932 0940-6719 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/176563 10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2 2-s2.0-85049566747 2-s2.0-85049566747.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/176563 |
identifier_str_mv |
European Spine Journal, p. 1-13. 1432-0932 0940-6719 10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2 2-s2.0-85049566747 2-s2.0-85049566747.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
European Spine Journal 1,535 1,535 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1-13 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129423339159552 |