Effect of different soil water managements on the selectivity of fomesafen in conventional and RR soybean

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves, Clebson G.
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Marques, Ricardo F. [UNESP], de Marchi, Sidnei R., Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2022.2116237
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241578
Resumo: The study aimed to study the selectivity of the herbicide fomesafen, sprayed at different growth stages of the conventional and RR soybean cultivars, under different soil water managements. Two soybean cultivars were used: MG/BR 46 Conquista (conventional) and BRS Valiosa (RR), submitted to the spraying of fomesafen at two phenological stages (V2-first open trefoil; V4-third open trefoil), under three soil water conditions (-0.03, −0.07, and −0.5 MPa). Under water scarcity conditions, soybean plants have lower visual phytotoxicity when subjected to the spraying of the herbicide fomesafen. There were anatomical differences between the leaf blades of the conventional (MG/BR 46 Conquista) and transgenic (BRS Valiosa–RR) cultivars, and the water scarcity changed the anatomy of the soybean plants. The condition of moderate water shortage (-0.07 MPa) led the conventional cultivar to present a lower development than the transgenic cultivar. The transgenic cultivar had a greater ability to sustain the biological nitrogen fixation under moderate water shortage conditions (-0.07 MPa) than the conventional cultivar.
id UNSP_9f0dac69ac28437f4e5b3e63ddf28dce
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241578
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effect of different soil water managements on the selectivity of fomesafen in conventional and RR soybeanGlycine maxmorphologyphytotoxicitysymbiotic N2-fixingwater deficit.HThe study aimed to study the selectivity of the herbicide fomesafen, sprayed at different growth stages of the conventional and RR soybean cultivars, under different soil water managements. Two soybean cultivars were used: MG/BR 46 Conquista (conventional) and BRS Valiosa (RR), submitted to the spraying of fomesafen at two phenological stages (V2-first open trefoil; V4-third open trefoil), under three soil water conditions (-0.03, −0.07, and −0.5 MPa). Under water scarcity conditions, soybean plants have lower visual phytotoxicity when subjected to the spraying of the herbicide fomesafen. There were anatomical differences between the leaf blades of the conventional (MG/BR 46 Conquista) and transgenic (BRS Valiosa–RR) cultivars, and the water scarcity changed the anatomy of the soybean plants. The condition of moderate water shortage (-0.07 MPa) led the conventional cultivar to present a lower development than the transgenic cultivar. The transgenic cultivar had a greater ability to sustain the biological nitrogen fixation under moderate water shortage conditions (-0.07 MPa) than the conventional cultivar.School Plant & Environmental Sciences Virginia Tech Virginia Polytech Institute & State UniversityDepartamento de Produção Vegetal (Matologia) FCAV-Faculdade de Ciências Agrarias e Veterinárias UNESPDepartamento de Matologia Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso–UFMTAigriculture and Natural Resources - UC Cooperative Extension University of California, Mendocino & Lake CountiesDepartamento de Produção Vegetal (Matologia) FCAV-Faculdade de Ciências Agrarias e Veterinárias UNESPVirginia Polytech Institute & State UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso–UFMTUniversity of CaliforniaGonçalves, Clebson G.Marques, Ricardo F. [UNESP]de Marchi, Sidnei R.Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP]2023-03-01T21:11:06Z2023-03-01T21:11:06Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2022.2116237Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part B Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes.1532-41090360-1234http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24157810.1080/03601234.2022.21162372-s2.0-85137049277Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Environmental Science and Health - Part B Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T13:56:28Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241578Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:52:09.844966Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of different soil water managements on the selectivity of fomesafen in conventional and RR soybean
title Effect of different soil water managements on the selectivity of fomesafen in conventional and RR soybean
spellingShingle Effect of different soil water managements on the selectivity of fomesafen in conventional and RR soybean
Gonçalves, Clebson G.
Glycine max
morphology
phytotoxicity
symbiotic N2-fixing
water deficit.H
title_short Effect of different soil water managements on the selectivity of fomesafen in conventional and RR soybean
title_full Effect of different soil water managements on the selectivity of fomesafen in conventional and RR soybean
title_fullStr Effect of different soil water managements on the selectivity of fomesafen in conventional and RR soybean
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different soil water managements on the selectivity of fomesafen in conventional and RR soybean
title_sort Effect of different soil water managements on the selectivity of fomesafen in conventional and RR soybean
author Gonçalves, Clebson G.
author_facet Gonçalves, Clebson G.
Marques, Ricardo F. [UNESP]
de Marchi, Sidnei R.
Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Marques, Ricardo F. [UNESP]
de Marchi, Sidnei R.
Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Virginia Polytech Institute & State University
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso–UFMT
University of California
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonçalves, Clebson G.
Marques, Ricardo F. [UNESP]
de Marchi, Sidnei R.
Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Glycine max
morphology
phytotoxicity
symbiotic N2-fixing
water deficit.H
topic Glycine max
morphology
phytotoxicity
symbiotic N2-fixing
water deficit.H
description The study aimed to study the selectivity of the herbicide fomesafen, sprayed at different growth stages of the conventional and RR soybean cultivars, under different soil water managements. Two soybean cultivars were used: MG/BR 46 Conquista (conventional) and BRS Valiosa (RR), submitted to the spraying of fomesafen at two phenological stages (V2-first open trefoil; V4-third open trefoil), under three soil water conditions (-0.03, −0.07, and −0.5 MPa). Under water scarcity conditions, soybean plants have lower visual phytotoxicity when subjected to the spraying of the herbicide fomesafen. There were anatomical differences between the leaf blades of the conventional (MG/BR 46 Conquista) and transgenic (BRS Valiosa–RR) cultivars, and the water scarcity changed the anatomy of the soybean plants. The condition of moderate water shortage (-0.07 MPa) led the conventional cultivar to present a lower development than the transgenic cultivar. The transgenic cultivar had a greater ability to sustain the biological nitrogen fixation under moderate water shortage conditions (-0.07 MPa) than the conventional cultivar.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
2023-03-01T21:11:06Z
2023-03-01T21:11:06Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2022.2116237
Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part B Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes.
1532-4109
0360-1234
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241578
10.1080/03601234.2022.2116237
2-s2.0-85137049277
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2022.2116237
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241578
identifier_str_mv Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part B Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes.
1532-4109
0360-1234
10.1080/03601234.2022.2116237
2-s2.0-85137049277
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part B Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129132125487104