Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736586 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210222 |
Resumo: | In recent years, concerns about fish welfare have increased in aquaculture, most pointedly regarding the slaughter process. Immersion in ice water (live chilling) is still commonly used as a stunning method in salmonids, but can have negative effects on the stress response and flesh quality. A valid alternative is electronarcosis, but the specific details of the intensity and frequency of the current applied depend on the species and size, and little is known about how that may affect fish welfare or product quality. In this study, adult rainbow trout (294 ? 8.44 g average weight) were subjected to three different stunning methods before slaughter: immersion in ice water and electronarcosis at two different current intensities (200 or 400 mA). Electronarcosis caused fish to lose consciousness faster than those live chilled. Plasma concentration of cortisol was lower in fish stunned with 400 mA (400 mA: 5.2 ? 0.67 vs. Ice: 9.1 ? 0.90; 200 mA: 9.3 ? 1.20 ng/ml). Creatinephosphokinase enzyme levels were higher in ice stunned fish compared to electronarcosis (Ice: 168 ? 2.32 vs. 200 mA: 114 ? 0.89; 400 mA: 104 ? 0.62 U/l). Regarding flesh quality, initial muscle pH was lower in fish stunned by ice immersion than by electronarcosis (Ice: 6.49 ? 0.034 vs. 200 mA: 6.76 ? 0.050; 400 mA: 6.61 ? 0.04), presenting also an earlier onset of rigor mortis. Fish stunned with 400 mA electronarcosis also presented higher levels of muscle glycogen than those stunned with ice water (0.181 ? 0.029 vs. 0.101 ? 0.013 mg/g). In conclusion, electronarcosis is a stunning method that can produce an immediate loss of consciousness in rainbow trout, reducing stress response before slaughter and improving flesh quality (with higher benefits using a current intensity of 400 mA), in contrast to immersion in ice water. |
id |
UNSP_a0458c986ea8e17e82791eccf0a7935d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/210222 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow troutStunning methodPre-slaughterCortisolMuscle pHRigor mortisIn recent years, concerns about fish welfare have increased in aquaculture, most pointedly regarding the slaughter process. Immersion in ice water (live chilling) is still commonly used as a stunning method in salmonids, but can have negative effects on the stress response and flesh quality. A valid alternative is electronarcosis, but the specific details of the intensity and frequency of the current applied depend on the species and size, and little is known about how that may affect fish welfare or product quality. In this study, adult rainbow trout (294 ? 8.44 g average weight) were subjected to three different stunning methods before slaughter: immersion in ice water and electronarcosis at two different current intensities (200 or 400 mA). Electronarcosis caused fish to lose consciousness faster than those live chilled. Plasma concentration of cortisol was lower in fish stunned with 400 mA (400 mA: 5.2 ? 0.67 vs. Ice: 9.1 ? 0.90; 200 mA: 9.3 ? 1.20 ng/ml). Creatinephosphokinase enzyme levels were higher in ice stunned fish compared to electronarcosis (Ice: 168 ? 2.32 vs. 200 mA: 114 ? 0.89; 400 mA: 104 ? 0.62 U/l). Regarding flesh quality, initial muscle pH was lower in fish stunned by ice immersion than by electronarcosis (Ice: 6.49 ? 0.034 vs. 200 mA: 6.76 ? 0.050; 400 mA: 6.61 ? 0.04), presenting also an earlier onset of rigor mortis. Fish stunned with 400 mA electronarcosis also presented higher levels of muscle glycogen than those stunned with ice water (0.181 ? 0.029 vs. 0.101 ? 0.013 mg/g). In conclusion, electronarcosis is a stunning method that can produce an immediate loss of consciousness in rainbow trout, reducing stress response before slaughter and improving flesh quality (with higher benefits using a current intensity of 400 mA), in contrast to immersion in ice water.Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO)Univ Complutense Madrid, Vet Sch, Dept Anim Prod, Ave Puerta Hierro S-N, Madrid 28040, SpainUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Apoio Prod & Saude Anim, Rua Clovis Pestana 793, BR-16050680 Aracatuba, BrazilUniv Complutense Madrid, Vet Sch, Dept Physiol, Ave Puerta Hierro S-N, Madrid 28040, SpainINIA, Dept Food Technol, Ctra La Coruna,Km 7500, Madrid 28040, SpainTech Univ Madrid, Dept Forestry & Fisheries, Ciudad Univ S-N, Madrid 28040, SpainTech Univ Madrid, Dept Anim Sci, Ave Puerta Hierro 2, Madrid 28040, SpainUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Apoio Prod & Saude Anim, Rua Clovis Pestana 793, BR-16050680 Aracatuba, BrazilSpanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO): AGL2013-45557-PElsevier B.V.Univ Complutense MadridUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)INIATech Univ MadridBermejo-Poza, Ruben [UNESP]Fernandez-Muela, MontserratDe la Fuente, JesusPerez, ConcepcionGonzalez de Chavarri, ElisabetTeresa Diaz, MariaTorrent, FernandoVillarroel, Morris2021-06-25T15:01:53Z2021-06-25T15:01:53Z2021-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article7http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736586Aquaculture. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 538, 7 p., 2021.0044-8486http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21022210.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736586WOS:000639143400006Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAquacultureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-04T19:15:25Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/210222Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-04T19:15:25Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout |
title |
Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout |
spellingShingle |
Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout Bermejo-Poza, Ruben [UNESP] Stunning method Pre-slaughter Cortisol Muscle pH Rigor mortis |
title_short |
Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout |
title_full |
Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout |
title_fullStr |
Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout |
title_sort |
Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout |
author |
Bermejo-Poza, Ruben [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Bermejo-Poza, Ruben [UNESP] Fernandez-Muela, Montserrat De la Fuente, Jesus Perez, Concepcion Gonzalez de Chavarri, Elisabet Teresa Diaz, Maria Torrent, Fernando Villarroel, Morris |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fernandez-Muela, Montserrat De la Fuente, Jesus Perez, Concepcion Gonzalez de Chavarri, Elisabet Teresa Diaz, Maria Torrent, Fernando Villarroel, Morris |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Complutense Madrid Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) INIA Tech Univ Madrid |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bermejo-Poza, Ruben [UNESP] Fernandez-Muela, Montserrat De la Fuente, Jesus Perez, Concepcion Gonzalez de Chavarri, Elisabet Teresa Diaz, Maria Torrent, Fernando Villarroel, Morris |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Stunning method Pre-slaughter Cortisol Muscle pH Rigor mortis |
topic |
Stunning method Pre-slaughter Cortisol Muscle pH Rigor mortis |
description |
In recent years, concerns about fish welfare have increased in aquaculture, most pointedly regarding the slaughter process. Immersion in ice water (live chilling) is still commonly used as a stunning method in salmonids, but can have negative effects on the stress response and flesh quality. A valid alternative is electronarcosis, but the specific details of the intensity and frequency of the current applied depend on the species and size, and little is known about how that may affect fish welfare or product quality. In this study, adult rainbow trout (294 ? 8.44 g average weight) were subjected to three different stunning methods before slaughter: immersion in ice water and electronarcosis at two different current intensities (200 or 400 mA). Electronarcosis caused fish to lose consciousness faster than those live chilled. Plasma concentration of cortisol was lower in fish stunned with 400 mA (400 mA: 5.2 ? 0.67 vs. Ice: 9.1 ? 0.90; 200 mA: 9.3 ? 1.20 ng/ml). Creatinephosphokinase enzyme levels were higher in ice stunned fish compared to electronarcosis (Ice: 168 ? 2.32 vs. 200 mA: 114 ? 0.89; 400 mA: 104 ? 0.62 U/l). Regarding flesh quality, initial muscle pH was lower in fish stunned by ice immersion than by electronarcosis (Ice: 6.49 ? 0.034 vs. 200 mA: 6.76 ? 0.050; 400 mA: 6.61 ? 0.04), presenting also an earlier onset of rigor mortis. Fish stunned with 400 mA electronarcosis also presented higher levels of muscle glycogen than those stunned with ice water (0.181 ? 0.029 vs. 0.101 ? 0.013 mg/g). In conclusion, electronarcosis is a stunning method that can produce an immediate loss of consciousness in rainbow trout, reducing stress response before slaughter and improving flesh quality (with higher benefits using a current intensity of 400 mA), in contrast to immersion in ice water. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-25T15:01:53Z 2021-06-25T15:01:53Z 2021-05-30 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736586 Aquaculture. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 538, 7 p., 2021. 0044-8486 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210222 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736586 WOS:000639143400006 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736586 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210222 |
identifier_str_mv |
Aquaculture. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 538, 7 p., 2021. 0044-8486 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736586 WOS:000639143400006 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Aquaculture |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
7 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1810021381563219968 |