Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bermejo-Poza, Ruben [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Fernandez-Muela, Montserrat, De la Fuente, Jesus, Perez, Concepcion, Gonzalez de Chavarri, Elisabet, Teresa Diaz, Maria, Torrent, Fernando, Villarroel, Morris
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736586
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210222
Resumo: In recent years, concerns about fish welfare have increased in aquaculture, most pointedly regarding the slaughter process. Immersion in ice water (live chilling) is still commonly used as a stunning method in salmonids, but can have negative effects on the stress response and flesh quality. A valid alternative is electronarcosis, but the specific details of the intensity and frequency of the current applied depend on the species and size, and little is known about how that may affect fish welfare or product quality. In this study, adult rainbow trout (294 ? 8.44 g average weight) were subjected to three different stunning methods before slaughter: immersion in ice water and electronarcosis at two different current intensities (200 or 400 mA). Electronarcosis caused fish to lose consciousness faster than those live chilled. Plasma concentration of cortisol was lower in fish stunned with 400 mA (400 mA: 5.2 ? 0.67 vs. Ice: 9.1 ? 0.90; 200 mA: 9.3 ? 1.20 ng/ml). Creatinephosphokinase enzyme levels were higher in ice stunned fish compared to electronarcosis (Ice: 168 ? 2.32 vs. 200 mA: 114 ? 0.89; 400 mA: 104 ? 0.62 U/l). Regarding flesh quality, initial muscle pH was lower in fish stunned by ice immersion than by electronarcosis (Ice: 6.49 ? 0.034 vs. 200 mA: 6.76 ? 0.050; 400 mA: 6.61 ? 0.04), presenting also an earlier onset of rigor mortis. Fish stunned with 400 mA electronarcosis also presented higher levels of muscle glycogen than those stunned with ice water (0.181 ? 0.029 vs. 0.101 ? 0.013 mg/g). In conclusion, electronarcosis is a stunning method that can produce an immediate loss of consciousness in rainbow trout, reducing stress response before slaughter and improving flesh quality (with higher benefits using a current intensity of 400 mA), in contrast to immersion in ice water.
id UNSP_a0458c986ea8e17e82791eccf0a7935d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/210222
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow troutStunning methodPre-slaughterCortisolMuscle pHRigor mortisIn recent years, concerns about fish welfare have increased in aquaculture, most pointedly regarding the slaughter process. Immersion in ice water (live chilling) is still commonly used as a stunning method in salmonids, but can have negative effects on the stress response and flesh quality. A valid alternative is electronarcosis, but the specific details of the intensity and frequency of the current applied depend on the species and size, and little is known about how that may affect fish welfare or product quality. In this study, adult rainbow trout (294 ? 8.44 g average weight) were subjected to three different stunning methods before slaughter: immersion in ice water and electronarcosis at two different current intensities (200 or 400 mA). Electronarcosis caused fish to lose consciousness faster than those live chilled. Plasma concentration of cortisol was lower in fish stunned with 400 mA (400 mA: 5.2 ? 0.67 vs. Ice: 9.1 ? 0.90; 200 mA: 9.3 ? 1.20 ng/ml). Creatinephosphokinase enzyme levels were higher in ice stunned fish compared to electronarcosis (Ice: 168 ? 2.32 vs. 200 mA: 114 ? 0.89; 400 mA: 104 ? 0.62 U/l). Regarding flesh quality, initial muscle pH was lower in fish stunned by ice immersion than by electronarcosis (Ice: 6.49 ? 0.034 vs. 200 mA: 6.76 ? 0.050; 400 mA: 6.61 ? 0.04), presenting also an earlier onset of rigor mortis. Fish stunned with 400 mA electronarcosis also presented higher levels of muscle glycogen than those stunned with ice water (0.181 ? 0.029 vs. 0.101 ? 0.013 mg/g). In conclusion, electronarcosis is a stunning method that can produce an immediate loss of consciousness in rainbow trout, reducing stress response before slaughter and improving flesh quality (with higher benefits using a current intensity of 400 mA), in contrast to immersion in ice water.Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO)Univ Complutense Madrid, Vet Sch, Dept Anim Prod, Ave Puerta Hierro S-N, Madrid 28040, SpainUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Apoio Prod & Saude Anim, Rua Clovis Pestana 793, BR-16050680 Aracatuba, BrazilUniv Complutense Madrid, Vet Sch, Dept Physiol, Ave Puerta Hierro S-N, Madrid 28040, SpainINIA, Dept Food Technol, Ctra La Coruna,Km 7500, Madrid 28040, SpainTech Univ Madrid, Dept Forestry & Fisheries, Ciudad Univ S-N, Madrid 28040, SpainTech Univ Madrid, Dept Anim Sci, Ave Puerta Hierro 2, Madrid 28040, SpainUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Apoio Prod & Saude Anim, Rua Clovis Pestana 793, BR-16050680 Aracatuba, BrazilSpanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO): AGL2013-45557-PElsevier B.V.Univ Complutense MadridUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)INIATech Univ MadridBermejo-Poza, Ruben [UNESP]Fernandez-Muela, MontserratDe la Fuente, JesusPerez, ConcepcionGonzalez de Chavarri, ElisabetTeresa Diaz, MariaTorrent, FernandoVillarroel, Morris2021-06-25T15:01:53Z2021-06-25T15:01:53Z2021-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article7http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736586Aquaculture. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 538, 7 p., 2021.0044-8486http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21022210.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736586WOS:000639143400006Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAquacultureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-04T19:15:25Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/210222Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-04T19:15:25Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout
title Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout
spellingShingle Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout
Bermejo-Poza, Ruben [UNESP]
Stunning method
Pre-slaughter
Cortisol
Muscle pH
Rigor mortis
title_short Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout
title_full Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout
title_fullStr Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout
title_full_unstemmed Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout
title_sort Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on stress response and flesh quality of rainbow trout
author Bermejo-Poza, Ruben [UNESP]
author_facet Bermejo-Poza, Ruben [UNESP]
Fernandez-Muela, Montserrat
De la Fuente, Jesus
Perez, Concepcion
Gonzalez de Chavarri, Elisabet
Teresa Diaz, Maria
Torrent, Fernando
Villarroel, Morris
author_role author
author2 Fernandez-Muela, Montserrat
De la Fuente, Jesus
Perez, Concepcion
Gonzalez de Chavarri, Elisabet
Teresa Diaz, Maria
Torrent, Fernando
Villarroel, Morris
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Univ Complutense Madrid
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
INIA
Tech Univ Madrid
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bermejo-Poza, Ruben [UNESP]
Fernandez-Muela, Montserrat
De la Fuente, Jesus
Perez, Concepcion
Gonzalez de Chavarri, Elisabet
Teresa Diaz, Maria
Torrent, Fernando
Villarroel, Morris
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Stunning method
Pre-slaughter
Cortisol
Muscle pH
Rigor mortis
topic Stunning method
Pre-slaughter
Cortisol
Muscle pH
Rigor mortis
description In recent years, concerns about fish welfare have increased in aquaculture, most pointedly regarding the slaughter process. Immersion in ice water (live chilling) is still commonly used as a stunning method in salmonids, but can have negative effects on the stress response and flesh quality. A valid alternative is electronarcosis, but the specific details of the intensity and frequency of the current applied depend on the species and size, and little is known about how that may affect fish welfare or product quality. In this study, adult rainbow trout (294 ? 8.44 g average weight) were subjected to three different stunning methods before slaughter: immersion in ice water and electronarcosis at two different current intensities (200 or 400 mA). Electronarcosis caused fish to lose consciousness faster than those live chilled. Plasma concentration of cortisol was lower in fish stunned with 400 mA (400 mA: 5.2 ? 0.67 vs. Ice: 9.1 ? 0.90; 200 mA: 9.3 ? 1.20 ng/ml). Creatinephosphokinase enzyme levels were higher in ice stunned fish compared to electronarcosis (Ice: 168 ? 2.32 vs. 200 mA: 114 ? 0.89; 400 mA: 104 ? 0.62 U/l). Regarding flesh quality, initial muscle pH was lower in fish stunned by ice immersion than by electronarcosis (Ice: 6.49 ? 0.034 vs. 200 mA: 6.76 ? 0.050; 400 mA: 6.61 ? 0.04), presenting also an earlier onset of rigor mortis. Fish stunned with 400 mA electronarcosis also presented higher levels of muscle glycogen than those stunned with ice water (0.181 ? 0.029 vs. 0.101 ? 0.013 mg/g). In conclusion, electronarcosis is a stunning method that can produce an immediate loss of consciousness in rainbow trout, reducing stress response before slaughter and improving flesh quality (with higher benefits using a current intensity of 400 mA), in contrast to immersion in ice water.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T15:01:53Z
2021-06-25T15:01:53Z
2021-05-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736586
Aquaculture. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 538, 7 p., 2021.
0044-8486
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210222
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736586
WOS:000639143400006
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736586
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210222
identifier_str_mv Aquaculture. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 538, 7 p., 2021.
0044-8486
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736586
WOS:000639143400006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Aquaculture
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 7
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1810021381563219968