Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martínez-Ávila, Daniel [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Budd, John M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2016-0129
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169853
Resumo: Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to update and review the concept of warrant in Library and Information Science (LIS) and to introduce the concept of epistemic warrant from philosophy. Epistemic warrant can be used to assess the content of a work; and therefore, it can be a complement to existing warrants, such as literary warrant, in the development of controlled vocabularies. In this proposal, the authors aim to activate a theoretical discussion on warrant in order to revise and improve the validity of the concept of warrant from the user and classifier context to the classificationist context. Design/methodology/approach: The authors have conducted an extensive literary review and close reading of the concept of warrant in LIS and knowledge organization in order to detect the different stances and gaps in which the concept of epistemic warrant might apply. The authors adopted an epistemological approach, in the vein of some of the previous commenters on warrant, such as Hope Olson and Birger Hjørland, and built upon the theoretical framework of different authors working with the concept of warrant outside knowledge organization, such as Alvin Plantinga and Alvin Goldman. Findings: There are some authors and critics in the literature that have voiced for a more epistemological approach to warrant (in opposition to a predominantly ontological approach). In this sense, epistemic warrant would be an epistemological warrant and also a step forward toward pragmatism in a prominently empiricist context such as the justification of the inclusion of terms in a controlled vocabulary. Epistemic warrant can be used to complement literary warrant in the development of controlled vocabularies as well as in the classification of works. Originality/value: This paper presents an exhaustive update and revision of the concept of warrant, analyzing, systematizing, and reviewing the different warrants discussed in the LIS literary warrant in a critical way. The concept of epistemic warrant for categorizational activities is introduced to the LIS field for the first time. This paper, and the proposal of epistemic warrant, has the potential to contribute to the theoretical and practical discussions on the development of controlled vocabularies and assessment of the content of works.
id UNSP_a13615ed899fcabe58497103b2d25826
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169853
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabulariesCategorizationEpistemic warrantEpistemologyKnowledge organizationLiterary warrantWarrantPurpose: The purpose of this paper is to update and review the concept of warrant in Library and Information Science (LIS) and to introduce the concept of epistemic warrant from philosophy. Epistemic warrant can be used to assess the content of a work; and therefore, it can be a complement to existing warrants, such as literary warrant, in the development of controlled vocabularies. In this proposal, the authors aim to activate a theoretical discussion on warrant in order to revise and improve the validity of the concept of warrant from the user and classifier context to the classificationist context. Design/methodology/approach: The authors have conducted an extensive literary review and close reading of the concept of warrant in LIS and knowledge organization in order to detect the different stances and gaps in which the concept of epistemic warrant might apply. The authors adopted an epistemological approach, in the vein of some of the previous commenters on warrant, such as Hope Olson and Birger Hjørland, and built upon the theoretical framework of different authors working with the concept of warrant outside knowledge organization, such as Alvin Plantinga and Alvin Goldman. Findings: There are some authors and critics in the literature that have voiced for a more epistemological approach to warrant (in opposition to a predominantly ontological approach). In this sense, epistemic warrant would be an epistemological warrant and also a step forward toward pragmatism in a prominently empiricist context such as the justification of the inclusion of terms in a controlled vocabulary. Epistemic warrant can be used to complement literary warrant in the development of controlled vocabularies as well as in the classification of works. Originality/value: This paper presents an exhaustive update and revision of the concept of warrant, analyzing, systematizing, and reviewing the different warrants discussed in the LIS literary warrant in a critical way. The concept of epistemic warrant for categorizational activities is introduced to the LIS field for the first time. This paper, and the proposal of epistemic warrant, has the potential to contribute to the theoretical and practical discussions on the development of controlled vocabularies and assessment of the content of works.Department of Information Science São Paulo State University (UNESP)School of Information Science and Learning Technologies University of MissouriDepartment of Information Science São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)University of MissouriMartínez-Ávila, Daniel [UNESP]Budd, John M.2018-12-11T16:47:53Z2018-12-11T16:47:53Z2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article700-715application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2016-0129Journal of Documentation, v. 73, n. 4, p. 700-715, 2017.0022-0418http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16985310.1108/JD-10-2016-01292-s2.0-850211202642-s2.0-85021120264.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Documentation0,613info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-30T06:03:07Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169853Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-09-30T06:03:07Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies
title Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies
spellingShingle Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies
Martínez-Ávila, Daniel [UNESP]
Categorization
Epistemic warrant
Epistemology
Knowledge organization
Literary warrant
Warrant
title_short Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies
title_full Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies
title_fullStr Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies
title_full_unstemmed Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies
title_sort Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies
author Martínez-Ávila, Daniel [UNESP]
author_facet Martínez-Ávila, Daniel [UNESP]
Budd, John M.
author_role author
author2 Budd, John M.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
University of Missouri
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martínez-Ávila, Daniel [UNESP]
Budd, John M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Categorization
Epistemic warrant
Epistemology
Knowledge organization
Literary warrant
Warrant
topic Categorization
Epistemic warrant
Epistemology
Knowledge organization
Literary warrant
Warrant
description Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to update and review the concept of warrant in Library and Information Science (LIS) and to introduce the concept of epistemic warrant from philosophy. Epistemic warrant can be used to assess the content of a work; and therefore, it can be a complement to existing warrants, such as literary warrant, in the development of controlled vocabularies. In this proposal, the authors aim to activate a theoretical discussion on warrant in order to revise and improve the validity of the concept of warrant from the user and classifier context to the classificationist context. Design/methodology/approach: The authors have conducted an extensive literary review and close reading of the concept of warrant in LIS and knowledge organization in order to detect the different stances and gaps in which the concept of epistemic warrant might apply. The authors adopted an epistemological approach, in the vein of some of the previous commenters on warrant, such as Hope Olson and Birger Hjørland, and built upon the theoretical framework of different authors working with the concept of warrant outside knowledge organization, such as Alvin Plantinga and Alvin Goldman. Findings: There are some authors and critics in the literature that have voiced for a more epistemological approach to warrant (in opposition to a predominantly ontological approach). In this sense, epistemic warrant would be an epistemological warrant and also a step forward toward pragmatism in a prominently empiricist context such as the justification of the inclusion of terms in a controlled vocabulary. Epistemic warrant can be used to complement literary warrant in the development of controlled vocabularies as well as in the classification of works. Originality/value: This paper presents an exhaustive update and revision of the concept of warrant, analyzing, systematizing, and reviewing the different warrants discussed in the LIS literary warrant in a critical way. The concept of epistemic warrant for categorizational activities is introduced to the LIS field for the first time. This paper, and the proposal of epistemic warrant, has the potential to contribute to the theoretical and practical discussions on the development of controlled vocabularies and assessment of the content of works.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
2018-12-11T16:47:53Z
2018-12-11T16:47:53Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2016-0129
Journal of Documentation, v. 73, n. 4, p. 700-715, 2017.
0022-0418
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169853
10.1108/JD-10-2016-0129
2-s2.0-85021120264
2-s2.0-85021120264.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2016-0129
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169853
identifier_str_mv Journal of Documentation, v. 73, n. 4, p. 700-715, 2017.
0022-0418
10.1108/JD-10-2016-0129
2-s2.0-85021120264
2-s2.0-85021120264.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Documentation
0,613
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 700-715
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1792961420060524544