Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00234 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241949 |
Resumo: | The benefits of the use of green nanotechnology to improve food security and sustainable agriculture have been highlighted in the past few years, such as through the encapsulation of active ingredients derived from botanical compounds. To evaluate ecological risks and to contribute to the development of safer nanoparticles for use in agricultural applications, this paper focused on the effects of the encapsulation of two mixtures of botanical pesticides (geraniol (GRL) and eugenol (EGL), and GRL and cinnamaldehyde (CND); concentration of active ingredients (a.i.) of 5, 20, and 100 mg a.i./kg-1) into zein nanoparticles on soil enzyme activities (acid phosphatase, arylsulfatase, β-1,4-glucosidase) at different incubation times (2, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days). Soils were also treated with pure zein nanoparticles at the same concentrations as those of the nanoformulations. The control samples consisted of untreated soils. Acid phosphatase was the most sensitive enzyme to the nanopesticide formulations applied at a high dosage (100 mg kg-1) following 2 weeks of the exposure, whereas arylsulfatase and β-1,4-glucosidase showed no significant responses to increasing doses of the nanopesticides, indicating soil enzyme resilience after pesticide exposure. Different concentrations of salt (NaCl; 0.01-0.4 mol L-1pH 7), humic acid (5-20 mg L-1pH 7), and pH (5-9) were shown to affect nanopesticides' properties in solution (e.g., particle diameter increased with the increase of the ionic strength, humic acid, and pH). Such results underline the potential uses of hydrolases as indicators of the soil quality and resilience as well as the effects of characteristics of a soil solution on particles' dynamics, mobility, and toxicity, which have important implications to assess soil health in response to botanical nanopesticides. |
id |
UNSP_a371dcdbee4f29b0bf6b1a711b8ec8ce |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241949 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agricultureenvironmental indicatorsnanoparticlesnanopesticidessoil enzymeszeinThe benefits of the use of green nanotechnology to improve food security and sustainable agriculture have been highlighted in the past few years, such as through the encapsulation of active ingredients derived from botanical compounds. To evaluate ecological risks and to contribute to the development of safer nanoparticles for use in agricultural applications, this paper focused on the effects of the encapsulation of two mixtures of botanical pesticides (geraniol (GRL) and eugenol (EGL), and GRL and cinnamaldehyde (CND); concentration of active ingredients (a.i.) of 5, 20, and 100 mg a.i./kg-1) into zein nanoparticles on soil enzyme activities (acid phosphatase, arylsulfatase, β-1,4-glucosidase) at different incubation times (2, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days). Soils were also treated with pure zein nanoparticles at the same concentrations as those of the nanoformulations. The control samples consisted of untreated soils. Acid phosphatase was the most sensitive enzyme to the nanopesticide formulations applied at a high dosage (100 mg kg-1) following 2 weeks of the exposure, whereas arylsulfatase and β-1,4-glucosidase showed no significant responses to increasing doses of the nanopesticides, indicating soil enzyme resilience after pesticide exposure. Different concentrations of salt (NaCl; 0.01-0.4 mol L-1pH 7), humic acid (5-20 mg L-1pH 7), and pH (5-9) were shown to affect nanopesticides' properties in solution (e.g., particle diameter increased with the increase of the ionic strength, humic acid, and pH). Such results underline the potential uses of hydrolases as indicators of the soil quality and resilience as well as the effects of characteristics of a soil solution on particles' dynamics, mobility, and toxicity, which have important implications to assess soil health in response to botanical nanopesticides.Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP), Avenida Três de Março 511, Alto da Boa Vista, SorocabaDepartment of Agricultural Production Sciences Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), JaboticabalDepartment of Civil Engineering McGill UniversityInstitute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP), Avenida Três de Março 511, Alto da Boa Vista, SorocabaDepartment of Agricultural Production Sciences Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), JaboticabalUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)McGill UniversityGalhardi, Juliana Aparecida [UNESP]Luiz De Oliveira, Jhones [UNESP]Ghoshal, SubhasisFraceto, Leonardo Fernandes [UNESP]2023-03-02T05:01:55Z2023-03-02T05:01:55Z2022-06-20info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article443-452http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00234ACS Agricultural Science and Technology, v. 2, n. 3, p. 443-452, 2022.2692-1952http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24194910.1021/acsagscitech.1c002342-s2.0-85132215249Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengACS Agricultural Science and Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-02T05:01:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241949Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:57:28.374459Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture |
title |
Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture |
spellingShingle |
Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture Galhardi, Juliana Aparecida [UNESP] environmental indicators nanoparticles nanopesticides soil enzymes zein |
title_short |
Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture |
title_full |
Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture |
title_fullStr |
Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture |
title_full_unstemmed |
Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture |
title_sort |
Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture |
author |
Galhardi, Juliana Aparecida [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Galhardi, Juliana Aparecida [UNESP] Luiz De Oliveira, Jhones [UNESP] Ghoshal, Subhasis Fraceto, Leonardo Fernandes [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Luiz De Oliveira, Jhones [UNESP] Ghoshal, Subhasis Fraceto, Leonardo Fernandes [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) McGill University |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Galhardi, Juliana Aparecida [UNESP] Luiz De Oliveira, Jhones [UNESP] Ghoshal, Subhasis Fraceto, Leonardo Fernandes [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
environmental indicators nanoparticles nanopesticides soil enzymes zein |
topic |
environmental indicators nanoparticles nanopesticides soil enzymes zein |
description |
The benefits of the use of green nanotechnology to improve food security and sustainable agriculture have been highlighted in the past few years, such as through the encapsulation of active ingredients derived from botanical compounds. To evaluate ecological risks and to contribute to the development of safer nanoparticles for use in agricultural applications, this paper focused on the effects of the encapsulation of two mixtures of botanical pesticides (geraniol (GRL) and eugenol (EGL), and GRL and cinnamaldehyde (CND); concentration of active ingredients (a.i.) of 5, 20, and 100 mg a.i./kg-1) into zein nanoparticles on soil enzyme activities (acid phosphatase, arylsulfatase, β-1,4-glucosidase) at different incubation times (2, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days). Soils were also treated with pure zein nanoparticles at the same concentrations as those of the nanoformulations. The control samples consisted of untreated soils. Acid phosphatase was the most sensitive enzyme to the nanopesticide formulations applied at a high dosage (100 mg kg-1) following 2 weeks of the exposure, whereas arylsulfatase and β-1,4-glucosidase showed no significant responses to increasing doses of the nanopesticides, indicating soil enzyme resilience after pesticide exposure. Different concentrations of salt (NaCl; 0.01-0.4 mol L-1pH 7), humic acid (5-20 mg L-1pH 7), and pH (5-9) were shown to affect nanopesticides' properties in solution (e.g., particle diameter increased with the increase of the ionic strength, humic acid, and pH). Such results underline the potential uses of hydrolases as indicators of the soil quality and resilience as well as the effects of characteristics of a soil solution on particles' dynamics, mobility, and toxicity, which have important implications to assess soil health in response to botanical nanopesticides. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-20 2023-03-02T05:01:55Z 2023-03-02T05:01:55Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00234 ACS Agricultural Science and Technology, v. 2, n. 3, p. 443-452, 2022. 2692-1952 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241949 10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00234 2-s2.0-85132215249 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00234 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241949 |
identifier_str_mv |
ACS Agricultural Science and Technology, v. 2, n. 3, p. 443-452, 2022. 2692-1952 10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00234 2-s2.0-85132215249 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
ACS Agricultural Science and Technology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
443-452 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128586641571840 |